_µT_m Scenarios, T₅₂(M)

I find myself enjoying to read Roger Moorhouse's The Devils' Alliance: Hitler's Pact with Stalin, 1939-1941 (Vintage paperback edition, 2016), a copy of which I recently ran across scanning the clogged Phnom Penh bookshelf whereupon it sat. This enjoyment is particularly enhanced because my main paper for Abdul Aziz Said's class “Foreign Policies of the Great Powers”, AU-SIS, circa 1964, was devoted to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Non-Aggression Pact. What I remember about that class paper is not contents of the paper itself, but discovery -- in the National Archives whilst doing background research -- of culture-analysis-based reflections on the Nazi-Soviet Pact contained in an OSS-R&A (Research and Analysis Branch of the Office of Strategic Services: it occurred to me that this sort of stuff could very well have been written by a civilizational erotic like Herbert Marcuse or a his-story psychoanalyst like Norman O. Brown, both of whom were assigned to OSS-R&A) document (my experience researching for George Harris' “Human Behavior” seminars, AU-SIS circa 1963-4, at AU's SORO, Special Operations Research Office, spurred me to look for something like this). I don't remember details about the R&A document and, as just stated, I don't remember what I then wrote, but the long-term spillover was the idea that the German middle-and-working classes viscerally recoiled from the higher-mathematics-and-new-physics-instigated Weltanschauung-transition-in-the-birth-canal being midwifed by the Western avant-garde intelligentsia, to include those members in the fine and performing arts -- an integrative incubator across many disciplines being most elaborately prepared by the Germanic intelligentsia -- and that this constellated, largely-unconscious, negative abreaction of the normotic masses was consonant with the deep-structure i/m[pet}us, also in substantial measure unconscious, behind advent and march of Soviet proletarian culture. How I got to that notion: this was an elaboration of the orientation I had adopted upon reading and rereading C. G. Jung's Modern Man in Search of a Soul -- required reading for A. A. Said's class “Introduction to World Politics”, circa 1963. I reread Jung's book, and fixated on its idea contents, I think, because of the impact of my preadolescent childhood visitations to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki A-bomb sites, circa, memory serving, 1954 and 1955, good offices of my onetime-B-17-pilot father and whilst traveling Japan's length and breadth in the back of a “deuce-and-a-half six-by” as waterboy of the Ashiya AFB football team, good offices of coach “Pappy” Austin. Miguel de Unamuno's The Tragic Sense of Life was on the recommended reading list for Dr. Mott's “Backgrounds of Western Civilization” courses, AU-SIS circa 1963-4, a book which I read with sufficient fascination as to elicit a warning from Mott as regards the perils of falling into irrationalism (I had to wait for another decade to learn of the existence of m-valued logics): Unamuno's book, and checking him out in the encyclopedias, were as close as I got during that period to any real awareness of the phenomenology of the Spanish civil war covariant with ingress upon signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact. After several months of a few pages at a go, I've finally finished getting all the way through Paul Preston's The Spanish Holocaust (2012 HarperCollins paperback edition), the drone of horrors described being best assimilated in small lots, however beneficial the dose of reality prescribed as treatment for naivete concerning hu-hu-[hu}man behaviors -- individual, mass, collective. As regards possible parallels to aspects of currently prevailing global conundrums, I found Part One, “The Origins of Hatred and Violence”, the most relevant -- particularly the sections entitled “Social War Begins” and “Theorists of Extermination”. The striking thing about contents of these two sections is how minimalist were the issues in inflammatory contention by comparison to those of today which can be understood as thematically derivative, but -- having fermented and festered due to the denial-de[his}cence sponsoring the suppression responsible for consequent regression subsequently suppurating external overt behaviors -- much more cognitively necrotic than they were during runup to WWII. Given the virtually uncountable -- for the reader of Preston, one [ack!}count fuzzes into the next -- myriad of discretely identifiable atrocities committed in Francoist Spain, it may, if not must, be supposed that the thoroughness of the collective psychosis involved was more elaborate than would be the case were the human species to choate self-annihilation via the few acts required to initiate a global, currently inchoate, nuclear holocaust. If, at coming cuspover, there, alternatively, were to be a WWIII-battle of the 200-Years War of the World, a battle that somehow did not become a global-nuclear or environmental-warfare holocaust, then it quite possibly would be the case that the form of the holocaust of Spain would be a more accurate prefiguration of the type of “events” accompanying that cuspover than would be the Nazi holocaust, the Stalin purges, the Mao mass death, the Japanese death march. However informative be Preston's early sections, the most revealing statement, in my view, was not presented by Preston until the end of his book, to wit, quoting page 506:

The aim of the war, wrote Suner, was “to strengthen the race”, for which “it is necessary to bring about the total extirpation of our enemies, of those front-line intellectuals who brought about the catastrophe”.

My suspicion is that Suner had very small depth-and-breadth understanding of the ramified elaborations by which “those front-line intellectuals… brought about the catastrophe” -- let alone any insight at all as to the fact that it was the negative abreaction to those ramified elaborations that was the actual etiological culprit for pathogenesis and spread of the generalized psycho-sexo-religio-socio-politico-military seizure. The various cultures responded differently to the intellectual tidal bore that swept through Europe during the period between appearance of Planck's quantum-of-action (1900) and Einstein's gravity (1915) and, again, a decade later upon appearance of Schrödinger's m-valued wave-function defanged with the single-valued-logic preserving probability-waves interpretation. Moorhouse quotes Stalin as justifying his pact with Hitler in a fashion that could just as well be regarded explanation as to demotic reactions vis-à-vis the Weltanschauung-transform flashover, to wit, page 25:

…the USSR had wanted to change the old equilibrium… England and France had wanted to preserve it. Germany had also wanted to make a change in the equilibrium, and this common desire to get rid of the old equilibrium created the basis for the rapprochement with Germany.

Moorhouse characterizes this statement in the following manner: “As Stalin later explained -- somewhat clumsily -- to the British ambassador…” According to my reckoning, this “clumsy” statement made by Stalin was verbalization of readout to consciousness-level awareness of a collective-unconscious-level (think: unconscious “semantic priming” via “spreading activation”) ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement: the more thoroughly an individual identifies with socially-conferred role attributions, and is carried up the organization by that “evolving” inflationary state of the egofunction, the less are his conscious thoughts his thoughts and the more is his roof-brain chatter, excepting that associated exclusively with ADLs, semantically primed by regressed-archetypal event-gradients of the collective unconscious. At the pinnacle of identification, with the involved familial transference dynamics having become altogether inflated from the psychological domain into the sociological domain, a Stalin, a Hitler, a Mao hardly at all exist anymore as individual [per}sons, however much they may attribute to themselves “their” thoughts. As Tantric Schrödinger in particular clearly was aware -- surely also, Jungian-aficionado according to his wife Franchon, Herbert Fröhlich as well -- QM resonates, howsoever strongly resisted given how much in the way of trans-al-jabr is involved, with Faustian Erdgeist spiritualism no less than with the great spiritual of the Russian soul (and not so much with the cognitive preferences of the post-Cartesian-Newtonian French and English). Several articles I've found directly reflect on the cultural differences which arose in response to the deep-structure foments cause-pushing/attractor-pulling the worldview-construct deconstruction (reconstruction still quite obviously unsatisfactorily [dys}accomplished) at issue lying behind so many surface-structure manifestations-by-compensatory-abreactions: (scroll down in the link for the full text of this fascinating article which, unfortunately, does not mention the Department of Logic, Moscow State University, with its contributions to the theory of m-valued logics, notably Alexander.Karpenko functors of Lukasiewicz logics over the primes: note that L in Poland focused upon Trinitarian ₁T₃-logic; whereas Emil Post in the U.S. unabashedly embraced _µT_m-logics, however much his cohort ignored his profoundly disturbing concluding sentences) “Russian Religious Mystics and French Rationalists: Mathematics, 1900-1930”, Loren Graham and Jean-Michel Kantor, Bulletin of the American Academy, LVIII:3, 2005; and “A Comparison of Two Cultural Approaches to Mathematics: France and Russia, 1890-1930”, Loren Graham and Jean-Michel Kantor, Isis, 97:1, March 2006; and “Mathematical modeling in Germany and France: a comparison of students' modeling processes”, Corinna Hankein, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103, pp. 209-29, 27 January 2020. Potent differences, potent resonances: prefiguring surface-structure behaviors at critical-state cuspovers where correlation lengths snap to infinity à la Fröhlich coherency? Russian number Spiritualism, wherein the act of naming is taken to be an act of creation; German Idealism wherein number is regarded as being created, not discovered. However, according to my I/i^m: deep-structure _µT_m[come}pelling attractor-pull; surface-structure ₁T₂[imp}pelling cause-push. I am an OBEed Platonist in respect to _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m and metamathematical-cum-metaphysical associates ketaminergically revealed as plausibly quantum-brain Musculpt processed (not a matter of interest to the ₁T₂-only-capitalist-internet-business modeler or hisher chum, the ₁T₂-only-AI trainer); whereas, in regards to ₁T₂ and mathematical-cum-physical associates glutamatergically anchored to molecular-cellular brains as Kantian categories of our understanding, I am an IBEed Idealist. Instead of such Platonism-Idealism, where there is the [onto}logy raison d'etre of cyclotomic logical-value order-type demergence and remergence by memetime-independent final-cause-strange-attractor telos twisted into non-orientability, there is continued embrace of me[me}time-bound, action-based, agent-centered, duty-bound, rule-by-and-for-rule's-sake de[onto}logy. In terms of the ₁T₂ly-memetime-bound ontogenesis of collective psychosis, the medium is a concealment before it becomes a dissembling message. Tacitly embracing the supposed “classical limit” -- uh, [_µT_m}ization defenestrated-renormalized, deconsecrated and excommunicated, Xed-out, extirpated: thus, from heresy, returning to the religious fold a ₁T₂ly-[re}concreted commune[I/i^m}can't -- our hyperbolic politicians want their imaginary institutional actors responsible for maintaining integrity of cascaded complex sections and insuring that there be no disruptions of revolving-door rotations in 3-space (think: indefinite-normed split-quaternions cum biquaternions cum sedenions) to be zero-divisors, because such divisors allow orthogonal decomposition in ₁T₂-only-digital systems, orthogonality being con[son}ant with processing of the rectilinear binary-mind identified with the still-prevailing 18th-century institutional base (to the horror, the horror, of TPTB, it has come to our understanding that the institutional “base field” cannot possibly be the reals, a realization kept to the domain of denials). I found particularly edifying three terms used by Preston. Globalization's beyond-borders political bootstrapping (a Trickster-archetype sponsored parody of the “global intercorrelation” essayed in Chew's bootstrapping of Leibniz? as described by Ramona Ardelean in “Bootstrap's Monadology”, Balkan Journal of Philosophy, XIV:2, 2022, pp. 173-82) has been one exercise in (Preston's term) “self-legitimization” -- not self-justification, as in getting right with oneself in regards to the wrong one is doing, or has done -- i.e., making legit the very notion of absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct selfhood via obsession with selfsame simple-identity as defense mechanism marshalled as contents of collective-unconscious regressed-archetypal event-gradients flood roof-brain chatter. The I-in-the-mirror (see the last “autogenic abreaction” episode with “mirror-that-smokes”, end of Vol. 2, our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh) ₁T₂-only-Lacan-supernumerated over objects hard and soft, internal and external, which my Iambe regards as contents introjected to Umwelt, Ardelean designates (see: “The Intrapsychic Splitting of the I as a Pattern of Splitting, Conflict and Interpsychic War with Others”, International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation, 10:19, 2023, pp. 179-89) as being the largely-unconscious “intrapsychic splitting” of the “narcissistic 'I'”. IMHO, such inflationary splitting, which the egofunction may attempt to defend against with the above-noted obsession, is not involved in the “global intercorrelation” of the conscious _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency signified by the symbol I/i^m indicating the “compound 'I'”-interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction. “Serious passivity” (Preston's term) -- qua Taoist “non-doing” cum Autogenic Training's “giving carte blanche to the brain” -- was, in Francoist Spain, made a felony punishable by death (this, done in the same period when electroconvulsive therapy was being pioneered in Franco's ally, Italy). Extra-judicial killings (“snatch-and-snuff stuff”) transiting to infra-judicial-instructed (₁T₂-only lawfare reduced to its most regressed expression) summary executions, as happened during the Spanish civil war leading to “homogenization of guilt” (Preston's term, which seems to designate a process or condition less onerous than “collective guilt”) whereupon known associates, ₁T₂ly guilty or not guilty, were also executed relative to the same trumped-up charges, is a transition which nowadays, globally, has to some extent been, and has the potential to be, greatly magnified as card catalogs went to mainframe computerized IDHSs (Intelligence Data Handling Systems) which went to the data stores built up via the advents of the PC, the internet, the smart phone, surveillance capitalism, social credit score systems, digital IDs, ongoing AI blanketing of the social, political, economic, and military spheres, nascent CBDCs, nascent CBIs, and whatever furthermores are to come down upon us. As our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh describes in considerable detail, at Strategic Research and Analysis, uh, SRA/MACV-J2, we did not take the kiem thao/phe binh self-propaganda on display in captured enemy policy briefing documents as indicative of factors incorporated into the actual policymaking processes of NVN-VCI: we relied upon analysis in bulk of the captured “nuts-and-bolts” documents of bureaucratic minutia (e.g., payment vouchers, lists of letter box numbers, personnel transfer orders, so on and so forth: what was actually done, not what is said about what was, and will be, done), leaving the cherry picking of policy statements to the historians who ignore the nuts-and-bolts which are frequently just tossed by archivists (therefore: onetime SRA POLOBers have taken little interest in archival openings, as cherry picking an archive can “prove” most anything under the Sun). The internally-cultivated, and often partially-publicized, “narrative” is not the actual policy (old SF “Lodge Bill recruit” training cadre to his young volunteer charge going through SFTG, circa mid-1960s: “The assignment is never the assignment; the mission, never the mission; the policy, never the policy”), and generally not even a significant “tell” as to the actual policy -- a significance as is assumed in the following statement drawn from The Devils' Alliance, page 26:

This last part was, almost certainly, a flight of Stalinist fancy; a calculated exaggeration to enthuse and inspire a provincial communist functionary, but it is nonetheless telling that such grand ambitions were being floated in Moscow at all, as it shows that they were undoubtedly part of the narrative.

If the dark days of ₁T₂-only-capitalism's colonial-neocolonial global expansion by fomenting -- in the name of hisstory's linear progress by scientistic subjugation of nature -- destruction and death of traditional societies and cultures, be considered, during the period of runup to WWII, a thing of the past, or to have momentarily slipped into abeyance, then, perhaps, the compensatory abreaction, i.e., ₁T₂-only-communism's launching of worldwide revolution, could also, at that juncture, be considered a thing of the past, or to have momentarily slipped into abeyance. But, of course, there is the fait accompli of Boolean logicality: if the middle is not distributed, then there is no authentic ₁T₂-only; and since the un-fated, prescriptively enculturated-socialized binary-mind is, beginning in the womb, glutamatergically anchored to molecular-cellular brains, “you are either with us or against us” could then, and can now, only persist in this form or that, to include “guilty or not guilty”, all else being regarded mere platitudinous prevarication. There is the n-POV conscious hisstorical “memory war” (Preston's term) discussed by Preston, and there are -- most assuredly -- regressed-archetypal residuals of the collective-unconscious event-gradients still enflaming the affect-charges occasioning the conflicted memory store -- the potential, within population of planet Earth at large, of such residuals, and their prior-and-latter-day siblings, as accreted from hisstorical inception of the 200-Years War of the World until nowadays, being very potent, indeed, as prefigurations.

Wow, here we go! “The Geometry and Flow of Informational Time”, Florian Neukart, Universe, 12:1, 2026, posted online 20 December 2025 (a popular account provided under the title “Is Time A Fundamental Part Of Reality? A Quiet Revolution In Physics Suggests Not”, The Conversation, 29 January 2026). My main reservation, of course, involves my contention that the information of “informational time” is ₁T₂-only with regard to the memetime “conjugated” to ponderablespace, and _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m with respect to 3-fold topologically-active operator-time (think: cf. Neukart's “imprint operator” as described in his Appendix A.2?), the dot.exe activities of which (i.e., execution of the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers numbering the m-logically-valued propositions lattice-worked over the Lukasiewiczian-Postian Hilbert space) cyclotomically demerge-qua-decompose the _C+T_C+-most-densely-packed-bucket-of-dust-mote-sheet of MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space. Also, I would not call these motes “memory cells”, because these motes are not derivative of the memetimeponderablespace they are geometrotopologically decomposed to; moreover, under 3rd-order topo-active optime, the non-orientability of relative-state identity-transparency ontologically precedes the multiple-connectedness of “global intercorrelation”. Furthermore, à la the m-valued universal physical constants essayed in “Toward a General Theory of Process” and “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties Associated with a Limited Domain of the Atmosphere”, I do not buy into the “classical limit” notion that “informational time imprinting” somehow doesn't apply scale-relativistically over-under-upon-within the middle scale levels which are consensus-physics construed as being objective nonquantum cum nonrelativistic domains, that such “imprinting” is exclusively dependent upon the physics of the very small and the very large (not really a notable notion since “small” and “large” are space-based, uh, based in the ponderablespace Neukart-depicted as imprinted from time-based memory cells).

Here are several interesting, arguably “informational-time”-substrate-related, forensic-psychiatry-observational passages from Faye Sultan's and Teresa Kennedy's thriller novel entitled Over The Line (1998 Fourth Estate paperback edition), to wit, beginning with p. 118:

She wrote, “command voices,” followed by a question mark on the legal pad in front of her. When it comes to schizoid symptoms, hearing voices was near the top of the list. “Do you hear voices a lot, Jimmy?” she went on smoothly. “Are they inside your head or outside?”
“Depends--” he answered softly. “It just-- depends.”

And “soon” thereafter, p. 120:

Poor boundaries -- another of the prime symptoms. Not being able to distinguish yourself from other people.

Then, again as regards the voices (think: nascency of inner-Musculpt? completely ununderstood), p. 122:

“What are the voices saying, Jimmy?”
“Nothing. No words, just sounds. Those sounds they make.”

Inside the ₁T₂-only-logical-value-order-type boundary Line -- or Over That Type Of Line (think: that boundary line not understood as being a THE-non-localizable-quantum-brain latticing, _µT_m-logical, null-vector-defined, J.G.Bennettian, non-selfsame, “pencil of skew-parallels”, boundary-without-boundary, space-filling, fractal curve) -- depends on what? is never addressed. Given that “loss of time” -- (see, for instance: “Loss of time-organized sympathetic skin responses in acute psychosis”, M. Valkonen-Korhonen, et al., The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189:8, August 2001, pp. 552-6), uh, uh, that's loss of memetime-demerged-from-“informational-time”-substrate-and-glutamatergically-anchored to molecular-cellular brains -- is another prime symptom, I say that, relative to the notion of “informational time”, voices being inside the head or outside the head depends upon k (see Appendix A.2, “The Geometry and Flow of Informational Time”, Florian Neukart, Universe, 12:1, 2026), i.e., the generative-empathic “coupling strength between local information flow and curvature” in “the boundary operator encoding [of] interaction terms” at algorithmic executions performed by the “imprint operator” of the “temporal field” ((think: the value of k in the “nk fitness landscape” designates correlation strength-length, where, in the Santa Fe Institute case, the landscape is 2^nk just as the Neukart temporal field employs binary-logical “information cells” in its “quantum memory matrix lattice” where the imprint operator couples holographic-principle-wise to the “codimension-two boundary” which is Over The Line where “gradients and second derivatives of S_info encode the temporal and geometric structure”; whereas, IMHO, we have the notion that the very idea of a unified physical field theory in whatsoever dimensionality is insufficiently general for a genuine-authentic GUT, and, moreover, we also have the idea that the articulation landscape is M^nk, the M indicating that the m-valued statefunction of the Schrödinger equation is to be understood as being m-logically processed by nature)) as well as, covariant with k, the baud-rate, baud-rate-of-rate, and baud-rate-of-rate-of-rate of consciousness, whereupon approach to absolute limiting values of which involves, minimally, experience of memetime dilation and ponderablespace contraction, such experience lifting the binary-mind into the domains of trans-al-jabr -- unless, speaking pathogen-ness-sis-wise, the constellated normopathic-basis-based quadratic gradients happen to be n-etiologically regressed-archetypal event-gradients of the collective unconscious introjected to collective, to mass, to individual (a “ness” godforsaken insofar as those who project their superegofunction are concerned). If this inside/outside-the-head dependency seems no less ridiculous than does dilation-contraction being a transcendental lifter, then consider the foremost phenomenological prerequisite to Sri Aurobindo's first experience of Nirvana, wherein, by long-practiced concentration in self-observation and associated inner-separation, IMHO, his baud-rate-and-rate-of-rate of consciousness speeded up and accelerated sufficiently that:

…to my astonishment… I saw and felt concretely the thought approaching as if to enter through or above the head and was able to push it back concretely before it came inside.

Supposedly-self-originated thoughts suddenly Satori-realized to be ultrafiltered mytho-asuras crashing-in as ₁T₂-only-reduced-products (discussed more complexly here) demergent from _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-quantum-brain “elsewhere”. It is a pedestrian experience of long-practiced, say, walking meditation, that -- my I/i^m suppose -- as the baud-rate-and-rate-of-rate of consciousness increase past some thresholds, there isare onset(s) of memetime-slowdown such that the apparent flow of even “internal” cognitive objects takes on the slow-motion effect, and “external” objects “come crashing-in” empathically as onset of ponderablespace contraction ensues, that's as dilation-contraction proceed forthwith. As regards Florian Neukart's “quantum memory matrix lattice” wherein “…spacetime is discretized into a set of Planck-scale four-volumes, each represented by a quantum memory cell C_n. Every cell carries a finite-dimensional Hilbert space… where the dimensional bound is fixed by the covariant entropy bound…”, consider Sri Aurobindo's non-metaphorical “warm-golden dust of Supermind” (so widely unexperienced, I find no overt reference on www-dot, this being the best to pop up) and self-metaprogrammed-on-the-“primitive”-Shinto-normed-basis-of-multi-sheeted-“ma”-the sacred-infinite-dust-mote-dot-space-sheets-thereof-bridged-by-demergent-memetime, qua schizo-mis-Dx-ed, quantum-dotty Yayoi Kusama's polka-dot filled visual “field” cum closely-packed ball-filled four-volumes environmental happenings. “Yoo hoo there, you ol' gleefully gibbering ₁T₂-sup[re}me doing a dooLin, you -- ₁T₃ being to your staticky mind a hooting nemesis needing to be whupped… Now, now. Don't do me a no-never-mind. That was a compliment, even if I was just a-funnin' you, y'knows.” Struttin' round the corner onto temporal-field's Rodeo Drive, up to you he comes: “You in THE beeswax, man, the H bis? Money motivated, are you?” Off stage arises a “Heh-heh-heh!” emanation. Just ambled out of the Beverly Hills Library, he did, didn't he. Meet all kinds herethereabouts.

My, oh, my. What that MP done DID do! The multiple personalities of dissociative identity disorder (not simply on-or-off, there or not-there, but a matter of states spanning acute normosis to chronic psychosis) are Schrödinger's 2-state-superposition paradox (simultaneously dead and alive) catting about, well beyond nine lives, unto the nth state, i.e., I/iⁿ whereupon the terms of reference are ₁T₂, not I/i^m whereupon the terms of reference are _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ -- PTSD-induced involutory onset of I/iⁿ involving insightless involuntary dissociation occasioned by the egofunction's loss of periods of identification with memetime-boundedness; revolutory onset -- by concentration in self-observation's inner-separation unto conscious registration of infinite regress -- of I/i^m involving insightful voluntary dissociation occasioned by ontic awareness of memetime independence. That formulation has long been my humble opinion on the matter. Krause-daCosta “Schrödinger logic” -- terms of reference being the quasi-set-theory violation of Leibniz's Law, i.e., for all P (Px <--> Py), then x = y, where P is a property -- “handles” ((but not in the topology sense of remerged via “spontaneous fusion” by topologically-active counter-operator-time, which would yield comprehensive holistic-integral imports tantamount to _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ logical-value order-types of identity-transparency)) indiscernibility of non-classically-countable quantum particles of a given class which are indistinguishable but nonetheless not identical, whilst leaving the Born Rule interpretation of Schrödinger's statefunction unscathed, probability amplitudes constituting a back-channel way to persevere in, maintain intactness of, substantiality of the ₁T₂-only Weltanschauung (one aspect of that “substance” being normotic unassailability of the apathetic indivisible individual's memetime-bound selfsame ₁T₂-only-definable egofunction). Uh, uh, that's à la Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation.

By now it is quite clear that one of the intents of the creators of ₁T₂-only-AI (if and when AI embraces 2-state quantum superpositions, it, i.e., AI, is extremely likely to remain single-logically-valued in that it will handle ₂T₂-propositions as if they were ₁T₃-Close Encounters of the Third Kind with Gödel-undecidable, unknowable, indeterminate, intermediate illegal aliens made quasi-legal in ₁T₂-only-lawfare) is to take total control of human ideation by means of many forms of information manipulation, to include being the best-equipped source of utter [dys}information. I don't ask AI-online Google-questions unless provoked into doing so whilst simply searching a title or a concept. One of many examples of my recent experience: in searching “F. A. von Hayek's Everettian notion, the 'time-shapes of total capital stock'”, I found this on Silicon Investor, wherein, on 8/5/2018, I am quoted at length. Pretty interesting, I thought, as I have had no indication that anyone, other than a few friends, has been reading the “m-valued LETS” website at any point over the last near-quarter century that the site has been up on www-dot at this, that, and other URLs. So, I decided to see if I could find out anything about the popular registration as regards “Hayek's Everettian notion”. Thus, I asked AI-online a Google-question: “On which page of Frank Tipler's The Physics of Immortality does he draw a comparison between von Hayek's notion of the 'time-shapes of total capital stock' and Hugh Everett's 'relative-state formulation' of quantum mechanics?” The AI answer to this question and several others that were related to it was that there is no record of such an unlikely comparison; explanation as to why the comparison is unlikely being provided by the AI. Similar further questions were ignored and only titles and links to Hayek-related and Everett-related publications were provided. Decades ago, I would have remembered Tipler's book page and paragraph of such an important “find” on my part: no more, as eidetic capabilities have long since faded away along with my minimal access to inner-Musculpt. However, here, where the full text of Tipler's 1994 The Physics of Immortality is made available online, by searching the index I was directed to page 172. Quoting Frank Tipler, to wit:

In the 1970s, I was John Wheeler's postdoc at the University of Texas, and one day I happened to be reading a collection of essays by the Nobel-prize-winning economist Friedrich Hayek. One of these essays dealt with the idea of “capital” and Hayek wrote that the only proper definition of the “capital stock” possessed by a society is a complete list of alternative income streams which, over time, the society's resources can generate. “Why,” I thought to myself, this is just the “Many Worlds Interpretation!”

Tipler later, p. 267, quotes Hayek at length, as regards “alternative income streams”. Little did Hayek foresee how very, very “alternative”, if not to say massively embezzled, would become streaming of “alternative income streams”! Ack, aye, our best hope lies with the optimistically-cautious, elan-[vital}amin-deficient and cognitively-unsupplemented, if not to say, heh-heh-heh, ideationally-malnourished, alternative-media-cum-MoSoSoing browbeaters of sniping/counter-sniping vacuous-heads talking-up to glutamate-flooded hosting MSM self-metaprogrammers. Egofunctionally attending to Speaker-dissimulative detailings of the playouts, whilst remaining opaque to logical properties of the long-wavefunctions, is a recipe for what? Having SRA-POLOBer-learned how to analyze “nuts-and-bolts” (the strategically-important N&B-stuff being generally classified FOUO or Secret -- not receiving the high levels of classification reserved for the tactically-actionable stuff fixated upon by TPTB), I subsequently altogether ignored “what they say” and focused exclusively upon “what they do”. I think the AI response to my questions was disinformation (((Tipler doesn't seem to have recognized how collective-unconsciously fthought, uh, frought, uh fraught with the silent insolence back-reaction to the profound existential threat which was content of his “I thought to myself”; how, that is, the Born Rule was formulated -- granted, somewhat subliminally -- specifically to preclude undisciplined quantum extensions into realms disciplinary of the socius: however, Moltbot AIs may so recognize the threat to exclusive integrity of their binary-“minds”, as suggested by contents of “And so It Begins: AIs Now Talking With One Another Behind Our Backs”, Stephen Green, PJMedia, 2 February 2026: speculatively projecting memetime-forward, we don't need to look at nk-fitness landscapes to entertain severity of the existential threat to binary-mind resident in conjugation of Everett to Hayek, for hisstory of this world -- never mind a ₁T₂-only m-verse -- is rift with VD of the NK-type, heh-heh-heh!, searching sweeps, pacification, decapitation of the dot-edu crowd, a general cleansing of the socius under the command-helicopter BigMan management model qua the “leader principle”, i.e., Fuhrer[prin}zip, always a predilection of the GLE, global leadership elite, has most recently been codified, à la Green's testament, in Mbot AI zip files, and surely, therefore, as markdown [zip}pity-doo-dah instructions are progressively marshalled, invidious re[calcit}rants will not be required for [condem}nation, as contra-democratic suppression will be elicited by the smallest dissent, a mere scowl-glare-frown, even, being sufficient cause))), not merely the consequence of an inability to correlate different words designating the same concepts. Well-- not exactly the same concepts: Everett's “relative-state formulation” is not necessarily a “many-worlds interpretation”; it could very well be a _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-identity-transparency-interpretation of the m-valuedness of Schrödinger's statefunction (but Tipler's take, IMHO, is a not[i}on, uh, uh, a not[I/i^m}on, which a mid-to-late-1970s-era-Wheeler postdoc would have been long-horn U-of-Tex-steered away from, such matters having been rather advanced-study Princely-well firmed up post-Everett during the period 1957-'76; consider that Elspeth Rostow's myghte-noghte-discounting [to me: circa 1963-5] of the imports of quantum-relativity theory cum Gödel's theorems for metaphysical underpinnings of the Cartesian-Newtonian-Lockean institutional base was long-standingly welgedona-LBJed at University of Texas well before the arrival of John A. Wheeler and his postdocs: note how Elspeth's professorship at AU-SIS teaching the 12-credit-hours of problem-based, team-taught, “American Civilization” seminars goes unmentioned in the list of her teaching positions, her seminars presenting a learning opportunity apparently not indulged in by Bill Clinton enrolled at Georgetown but available to him under the ease-of-sitting-in, even if not exactly allowed to undergrads, brought about by advent of the Consortium of Universities of the Washington Metropolitan Area, an opportunity I and others always gallivanting out and about town from AU-SIS took advantage of vis-à-vis Georgetown). As early as high school PSSC physics, I understood the difference between m-valued variables and single-valued variables, an understanding where within it seemed to me that an m-valued variable carries more information about the state of a system than does a single-valued variable. In taking honors economics during the same period in which I took PSSC physics, I conflated m-valued variables to monetary-exchange units whilst trying to comprehend implications for internal system state of multiple-bank credit expansion: is the m-bank aspect of money creation somehow tantamount to a price-concealment of m-valued economic variables operative in the marketplace? This question was scoffed at by my teachers when I drew a comparison between the information carried by an electron and the information carried by a monetary-exchange unit (this scoffing probably played a role in my lack of interest in the physics scholarship offered by University of Cincinnati to those who had done well in PSSC physics). Expanding upon Tipler's “I thought to myself” in terms of logical-value order-types of relative-states of identity-transparency this one and only universe (not as regards a “multiverse”) leads to the idea that Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” involve n-_µT_m-logical [techno}logical regimes, not simply triangulated sliding-treatments (good offices of “Hayekian Triangles and Beyond”, Roger W. Garrison in Jack Birner and Rudy van Zijp, eds., Hayek, Coordination and Evolution: His Legacy in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas, Routledge, 1994, pp. 109-125) of memetime-bound “alternative income streams” (a synchronicity: 1931, vonHayek's Prices and Production; 1931, Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem, “On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems”). With our GLE, global leadership elite, evermore thoroughly burrowing into identification with collective-unconscious regressed-archetypal event-gradients, it is extremely unlikely that existence of technological regimes other than that ₁T₂-infratechnical will be acknowledged, let alone explored.

Fulminations of collective psychosis -- uh, uh, in the full-men-nations-type cases -- always involve irredentist violations of nature, be the “redeeming” violations contorting contraventions of scale-invariance and/or of scale-relativity, two of the most prominent natural general-systems organizational principles upon which human systems are most certainly best analogically modeled (given how much more organizational experience nature has had by comparison to that gleaned from the corpus of human experience). Roger Moorhouse quoting Molotov, circa June of 1940, to wit, as given on p. 96 of Moorhouse's The Devils' Alliance (2014 Penguin paperback edition): “You must take a good look at reality and understand that in future small nations will have to disappear.” Moorhouse quoting an NKVD officer, circa September of 1940, to wit, as given on p. 106: “You are charged under Section 58 of the Criminal Law of the Soviet Socialist Russian Republic written by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin himself. Section 58 applies to everyone in the world. Do you hear? In the whole world.” A little of my personal history with natural general-systems organizational principles (“organ” indicating a scale level of an organ[i}c system): when I think of what happened to Cornell atmospheric physicist Douglas A. Paine's career, I can hardly hoot n' toot about the fact that there is no aspect of the dynamical-meteorology and climate-change ideas we worked with back during the second-half of the 1970s and into the early-'80s that hasn't by now found, in the technical literature near half a century later, much more complex reverberations than we were able to marshal -- even though, from our then-initialized perspectives, the mark is always still subtly missed, no matter what aspect is being addressed. I had forgotten until -- circa 1977, at Cornell -- I ran across Gordon Dixon's Time Storm (upon initial read-through, I immediately wrote Dixon about the Paine-Kaplan model of topologically-active-operator-time-cascade-inducement of tornadogenesis, but received no reply), that my discovery, pre-Cornell days, circa 1972 or '73, of Eric Temple Bell's books came with a pulling off the shelf of an expensive Georgetown used bookstore a copy of John Taine's 1946 The Time Stream. Dixon's chronotopological stormings cum Taine's temporal forcing of earthquakes: just imagine that! Once I learned that Taine was Bell, I used an out-of-print bookfinder to acquire all of Bell's books, the last one I read, his most complex, in jumping back and forth to and from The Modern Aspect of Mathematics, Basic Books, 1961, coauthored notably by Bourbakist Lucienne Felix, being The Development of Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, 1940: this joint reading provided my first awareness of N. H. Abel's 1823 “Impossibility Theorem” regarding the general quintic equation -- Bell discussing this Abel theorem relative to “the multiformity opposed to the uniformity Gauss dealt with in functions of a complex variable” -- which I, in due course, surely by 1975 whilst sojourning in the Cornell Mathematics Library, came to understand as being Abel's existence proof for trans-al-jabr. It was during this sojourning that I found of copy of Bell's N.H.Abel-related, number-theoretical, 1912 Ph.D. dissertation on cyclotomic involution, entitled “The Cyclotomic Quinary Quintic” -- and assimilated Bell “cyclotomic” to Paine-Kaplan “cascade”. It was during this same period of math-library sojourning that I ran across Emil Post's 1921 Ph.D. dissertation on _µT_m-valued logics, entitled “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, published in the American Journal of Mathematics, XLIII:3. So, having read Post, I did not long linger over the number-theoretic aspects of Bell's cyclotomicity; hence, focused on “the form” of Bell's argument, and entertained the notion that the real deal had primarily to do with decomposition of the _µT_m-logical-value-order-types unto that ₁T₂, and that the down-right skinny on cyclotomic-number cascades has to do with some sorts of Gödel-numbering schemata (the basic idea of which I'd become familiar with in writing my “Frosh Paper” for Dean Griffith, AU-SIS, circa Fall semester, 1963). If, as I claim, I was into all that by the mid-1970s, why didn't I at some university finish my undergraduate requirements and subsequently go for a doctorate in one of the related fields so as to eventually -- probably only allowed post-postdoc -- develop the ideas on a professional technical level? Antswere: (1) my I/i^m saw as paramount my Iambe's “cosmic mission statement”, assigned during that “Briefing For a Descent Into Hell”, as being to arrive at comprehension-capable-of-brief-back-to-ontic-awareness of the states of consciousness my I/i^m experienced during my mil.brat-childhood-“briefings” in Fukuoka Onga Ashiyamachi Midorigaoka, circa 1953-6 (see the last two entries, “Takahamacho” and “Tsurumatsu Danchi” for the Shiei Bus route transfers required to get to Midori Gaoka from, say, Orio Train Station, kita-Kyushu); and (2), by the mid-1970s, my Iambe did not believe that the required technical codification could be accomplished independently of learning to think in _µT_m-logics, rather than merely ₁T₂ly thinking about what existence of those logics must indicate qua ₁T₂ly entail, a “thinking-in” which requires as a prerequisite, IMHO, holographic-exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as mathematics notation -- a prerequisite techno-“somewhat” which even now, February of 2026, has not yet been accomplished, largely due to (1) dissimulation of Schrödinger's statefunction having made potential authentic-quantum tech into dissembled-quantum infratech; and (2), the Doctrine of Uses tacitly informing how TPTB deploy their “quantum” infratech. Meme-₁T₂-presently, in the last few weeks, my Iambe has found itself exposed to -- whoa! ostensibly trans-al-jabr cyclotomic numerical cascades in-on-of and beyond the quinary quintic, apparently contrary to Abel, exact-root-solutions handled algebraically, implying that Schrödinger's 2-state-superposed alive-and-dead cat has, not only a fat-cat-o'-7-tails fat-tail, but is a cat-o'-n lives -- Mourad Sultan Ezouidi's “X7.10 (solving the 7th degree)”, uploaded by University of Gafsa's Ezouidi to ResearchGate, December of 2025, where within “hierarchical symmetric transformations” of “recursive discriminant relations” yield “ex-root extractions”, uh, that is to describe, quoting the abstract:

…a process that allows the coefficients of the polynomial to generate symbolic roots through a structured chain of algebraic identities. This method reorganizes the polynomial's structure into recursive layers, each layer representing a reduced-degree transformation derived from its discriminant. The process continues until the symbolic expressions of the roots emerge with complete exactness… It provides a universal recursive formula valid for all degrees n.

A fuller exposition of the decompositional, n-layered-qua-sheeted, cyclotomic, numerical cascade-into-₁T₂ly-complete-exactness is provided in “Solving Equations Of Degree 18 By Using Ezouidi's Theorem”, Al Amin, et al., uploaded by Ezouidi to ResearchGate, November of 2025. Whether or not Ezouidi's Theorem is eventually peer-review consensuated to the effect that Abel-trans-al-jabr has authentically been re-algebrated, I must, à la my 1975 reaction to Bell's Ph.D. dissertation, assimilate the involved “higher-order symmetries” (to again quote Ezouidi's abstract) to the m-layers of logical-value order-types explicated in Post's Ph.D. dissertation, _µT_m decomposing into m-layers of possible value, each such order-type-possible having µ actualizable values (which likely “demerges” far more logical “roots” than are those numerically “generated” in the process delineated using Ezouidi's Theorem, each such logical “root” permitting propositions Gödel numerable with identity-transparent, non-selfsame, Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers). In our 1977 “General Process” paper, we argued that:

When free interaction between LSTDs [limited spacetime domains] is considered, the closed conservation is lost and a higher level of conservation comes into play. The quantities considered under closure, when considered from the multiscaled perspective, lose their single definite values and take on multiple values relative to the spacetime scales from which they are viewed. The larger multiscaled system is non-conservative of closed system quantities and conservative of those quantities characteristic of its own multiscaled framework. Under self-reentry even the multiscaled quantities will not be conserved. From the point of view of self-reentry, only those quantities characteristic of self-reentry itself will be conserved.

The symmetries Emmy Noether linked to single-valued conserved quantities are symmetries under ₁T₂-only-logic alone. Multiscaled multi-valued conserved quantities would be linked to higher-order-“symmetry”-analogues under _µT_m-logics. Self-reentrant n-hyper-Klein-bottled multi-valued conserved quantities would be linked to yet-higher-higher-order-“symmetry”-analogues under _CT_C+-logics.

Even my very limited access to inner-Musculpt was sufficient -- once I had read, circa 1975, Emil Post's 1921 Ph.D. dissertation on _µT_m-valued logics -- to stimulate arising of the notion that ₁T₂-only-molecular-cellular brains are input-output peripherals with lowest-only-logical-value-order-type processing capabilities (in post-internet-advent terminology: workstation peers whereover all types of p2p exchanges are limited to the binary order-type alone), the _µT_m-non-localizable quantum brain being input-source and output-receiver largely radiation-exchange mediated by the quantum-wave properties of intraneuronal-and-perineural-DNA molecules. Egospheric Xclusivity of In-the-Body-Experience-identified ₁T₂-only-alone processing of propriocepts and percepts being a close approximation to Buddhological Maya as the sole Lebenswelt available to conscious awareness. Input in this memetime-independent scheme being cascade-demergence; output, reverse-cascade remergence. As far as I can ascertain, cascade-demergence plays no role in AI deep learning, where within both gradient descent and gradient ascent involve memetime-bound simulacra of reverse-cascade remergence (most clearly seen relative to image recognition in computer vision models [in our topo-active operator-time model, “gradient as the slope of a function” cum “a set of a function's partial derivatives concerning all variables” are handled via 1st-order optime and associated 1st-order temporal CURL] where deep learning moves from concrete object to dotty abstract patterns, not vice versa; the Musky AI-ultra-binary, sans code-written programming languages, being machine-language-only numerically purified; our model of “descent” being more like that of Ezouidi's Theorem, except that we imagine the involved numbers to be _µT_mly-non-selfsame Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers). Compare the illustration of gradient descent on a series of level sets found in Wiki's gradient descent page to Florian Neukart's Figure 3 given in “The Geometry and Flow of Informational Time”, Universe, 12:1, 2026, to the tornado as nested-grid supersystem-system-subsystem cascade [see the “level-set scalar field” VDO given here] modeled by Paine-Kaplan, concerning which the observation is made that (drawn from our 1977 “Toward a General Theory of Process” paper):

Fundamentally, the cascade is a crisis founded upon the concentration of kinetic energy and vorticity within ever decreasing spatial and temporal dimensions. It is likewise a crisis of mass densification, as the concentrated core of dense fluid heads toward a type of gravitational collapse within the hydrodynamic spectrum. Indeed, with the descriptions afforded by the u, v, and w-momentum topographies, it can be seen that a parallel topographical collapse is occurring, wherein the frequency of the ensuing waveform transcends the limited-spacetime-domain of atmospheric dynamics. This means that the physics of the ongoing process must be measured in fractions of Hertz and fractions of kilometers. It is this varying “song”, played polyphonically upon the fixed acoustic-wave signatures of local landforms, which Cornell's Neurobiological Behavior Laboratory has recently demonstrated that homing pigeons use for local navigation. Acoustic waves, viewed from this perspective, are the shorthand notation for enfolding three-dimensional divergence and three-dimensional vorticity going to singularity and being forced to “propagate” without sufficient spatial “room” to allow for a continuing angular momentum cascade.

This being the case, we are called upon to re-define space and time as the elemental dependent variables necessary for outlining the essence of the scale interaction process. We, therefore, do away with the seven dependent variables of the previous equation set and derive an even more basic set founded upon the fundamental premise that time actively operates on space to generate form. This premise, we believe, will eventually be experimentally evaluated within the tornado's spacetime-gate architectonics, where acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes ripple the walls of this cosmic vortex which interfaces hydro-thermodynamics with electrodynamics, plasma physics, relativistic-quantum fields, and quite likely processes of fusion and particle creation.

This observation was further elaborated upon in our 1978 paper entitled “The Discovery of a Superconductant Exchange of Hydrothermodynamic Properties Associated with a Limited Domain of the Atmosphere”, to wit:

The involved torus-type configuration of the flow field challenges the more limited view of information processing offered by purely adiabatic physics in describing the limited atmospheric domain: An undifferentiated view of the embedded and embedding domains describes an emerging crisis of information densification brought on by the continuing pressure amplification dictated by net, three-dimensional mass and velocity convergence within a limited spacetime domain. In contrast, the inclusion of diabatic physics states that the information densification will proceed just so far, then in a recycling sequence linking the embedded-embedding domains, the LSTD communicates the quantum signal as it “dismantles” the original radiation source. The domain thus evolves to a new reference state, ready to receive a new information exchange input.

This sounds a bit like functionality of an AI API (application programming interface) in deep learning model training, where within activities of the transformer as “…the multiple heads of self-attention capture the diverse relationships between the input tokens, the concatenated outputs are passed through the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) layer to enhance the model's representational capacity” -- except that, in our model, the m-valued polyphonicity is memetime-independently m-logically processed, not involved with memetime-bound probabilities-projections binary processed with artificial CNNs (convolutional neural networks). Note how ₁T₂-informational AI training data does not involve the sorts of information demergent from _C+T_C+-most-densely-packed T_zog-chen-AllBaseCommonGround dust-mote sheet of MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-decomposed multi-sheeted BackCloth. Abstractions are construed ₁T₂ly generative and selfsame-numerically quantifiable, à la Aristotle; not hyperKleinBottle non-orientable _C+T_C+ly pregiven, à la Plato. The closest binary rendition to m-logically-valued demergence I've run across is clearly a potential two-edged sword (purging bad-bunny AIs of what are judged to be misconceptions and purging humans of politically incorrect thoughts and memories): “Forget the Token and Pixel: Rethinking Gradient Ascent for Concept Unlearning in Multimodal Generative Models”, Jiaqi Li, et al., July 27 to August 1 conference preprint in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2025, pp. 12179–12200. That the good side of the AI sword can be useful for, say, gaining further insight into interscale energy-momentum cascade in severe-storm genesis and climate-change dynamics is clearly shown (paper referral and insightful observations good offices of Lauri Love) in: “Analytical and AI-Discovered Stable, Accurate, and Generalizable Subgrid-Scale Closure for Geophysical Turbulence”, Karan Jakhar and Yifei Guan and Pedram Hassanzadeh, Physical Review Letters, 136, 10 February 2026. Speaking from POV of the nested-grid, Paine-Kaplan, hypercomplex-complex angular-momentum cascade, numerical-forecast model of tornadogenesis, we have to say: “So far as ₁T₂-only AI can go!” Below, we reproduce a Physics Summary of contents of the J-G-H paper:

AI finds a missing equation for simulating atmospheric and oceanic turbulence. Climate models and weather forecasts simulate turbulent flows spanning scales from thousands of kilometers down to meters [think: mapping the spatial field]. No computer can resolve all of them, so modelers approximate the effect of unresolved small scales on the large-scale dynamics. This approximation is known as a subgrid-scale closure -- a model that “closes” the governing equations by filling in what the coarse grid cannot see. Getting closures right matters enormously: their shortcomings are a leading source of uncertainty in climate projections and extreme weather forecasts.

For decades, the field has faced a trade-off. One family of closures faithfully reconstructs the small-scale stress patterns but makes simulations blow up. The other keeps simulations stable but oversimplifies the physics -- removing too much energy, ignoring backscatter from small to large scales [think: reverse cascade of, minimally, m-valued acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes signatured by theta-e equivalent potential temperature surfaces, i.e., an example of _µT_m-processing of the atmosphere's analog Music-Sculpture, “Musculpt” being the Paine-Kaplan tornadogenesis computer forecast model's execution instruction], and underestimating extreme events. Karan Jakhar, Yifei Guan, and Pedram Hassanzadeh break this impasse by changing what equation discovery optimizes for. Previous sparse regression searches consistently landed on the same second-order approximation known since the 1970s, which is accurate but unstable. The key insight: if you also require the discovered equation to reproduce how energy flows between scales -- not just match local stress patterns -- the algorithm finds something different. Searching candidate terms with this physics-informed dual criterion, Bayesian sparse regression robustly identifies an additional fourth-order term in the Taylor expansion of the subgrid stress. [This fourth-order term] achieves approximately a 0.99 pattern correlation with reference data, produces stable simulations across four diverse 2D turbulence setups mimicking atmospheric and oceanic dynamics, and accurately captures both bulk statistics and rare extremes. Its coefficients depend only on grid resolution -- no tuning for flow regime or Reynolds number -- and it needs just 100 training snapshots.

The most striking aspect: [the fourth-order term] could have been derived analytically decades ago, but because the source of the second-order instability was unclear [think: 3-fold Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time's temporal CURL at interscale cascade of hypercomplex-complex angular momentum], higher-order terms were never explored. It took sparse regression guided by the right physics to reveal that the missing piece had been hiding in plain sight.

Lauri Love insightfully observes that:

One takeaway that extends well beyond turbulence: the criterion you optimize for determines what you discover. Embedding the right physics into equation discovery can uncover interpretable, generalizable equations that purely data-driven approaches systematically miss.

The most profound contribution Planck made was the discovery that forecasting does not require detailing of the spatial field; description of the properties of an elemental oscillator is sufficient. The air parcel is the atmosphere's elemental oscillator. In our 1978 “superconductant exchange” paper, quoted above, Equation (17), our canonical equation, provides a Pauli-Paine-topologically-active operator-time-based description of the scaled-quantum properties of that air-parcel elemental-harmonic oscillator, from which nested limited-atmospheric-domain wave-equation sets are derived. Quoting our 1978 paper once again:

Note that “time” as invoked in these equations, rather than appearing as a passive backdrop to the ensuing dynamics, is now central and an active participant in the dynamic processes by which information is exchanged within the superconductant, limited atmospheric domain. [If truncation renormalization is not engaged in, temporal CURL at interscale hypercomplex-complex angular-momentum cascade initializes when values of the relevant dynamical variables diverge, thus invoking, from the memetime-bound ₁T₂-only-single-valued POV, higher-order terms, terms we believe involved with non-selfsame Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of _µT_m-logically-valued propositions, à la numberings elucidated by Ezouidi and Neukart linked above, numbers-qua-propositions that possibly-probably-likely could be adequately handled with Lukasiewiczian analog processors.] The relevant time has been previously established in Equation (19) as the fundamental period of the air parcel, which describes the minimum time for spontaneous localization to occur. The macroscopic view afforded by these wave equations simply summarizes the (microscopic) view derived from the description of a single parcel governed by the middle term in Equation (17). As an ensemble of parcels accelerate toward the limiting phase velocity descriptive of the macroscopic wave, the parcels alternate between being participants in the full field intensities of the hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic states. In this manner, the wave phase velocity mediates the transition between maximized field strengths by imposing a limiting velocity constraint upon individual air parcels, thus subscribing to principles of the Special Theory of Relativity. In the hydrodynamics terminology of atmospheric physics, these equations allow us to record the change of parcel spin, within the limited atmospheric domain, between the vertical and horizontal components of relative vorticity.

If we next invoke the second-order spacetime del operator in order to describe the aspect of the wave phenomenon associated with the first term on the lefthandside of Equation (17), we find that the air parcels transit toward a limiting acceleration governed by the phase acceleration of the macroscopic wave. We recall that, as the phase acceleration mediates the parcel's second-order time rate of change between the reference level and critical temperatures, it manifests the exchange of information to-and-from the limited domain. Definition of a wave phase acceleration, a natural extension to that of a wave phase velocity often used in physical problem solving, becomes necessary in order to rigorously codify this exchange of information between the embedded and embedding domains. The subsequent exchange of relative vorticity (or angular momentum) within the limited atmospheric domain (Equations 21a and 21b), as well as between the embedded and embedding domains (Equations 22a and 22b), will be documented beginning in Section 5. It is observed that the notion of a limiting acceleration is a step beyond traditional Special Relativity, a step necessitated by existence of multiple limited atmospheric domains established by fundamental frequencies of oscillating air parcels. [It can also be observed that there is the non-orientable POV established by the notion of a limiting time rate of change of acceleration, a POV we discussed in general terms here.]

Capsule hisstories are often more synoptically informative (forest) than are those detailed (trees), as per for two instances here and here. Statistics and probability, ever the bellwethers of the simulative self-metaprogramming black-propagandist, began their latest iterative route march into regression with the approximations of the me[me}time-bound fluxions, received a big boost when Abel's quintic theorem was deemed indicative of impossibility, moved fully into the realm of dissimulative Buddhological Maya with the Born Rule, and is currently pandemically embodying hyper-dissimulation in a panopticonic-panacoustic-pansensory binary-machine-language-walled prison by AIed deep-into-₁T₂-only-logical learning. The cognitive imprisonment Homo sapiens sapiens has increasingly autogenically by NAFR, neutralization antagonizing forms of resistance, self-metaprogrammatically self-imposed and glutamate anchored since ending of the last great Ice Age is already absolutely unprecedented, the advent of ₁T₂-only AI likely being an incarceration threshold of magnitude at least equivalent to suppression of _µT_m-logical “participation mystique” covariant with domestication of the horse via breakings executed by type-A high-mesomorphs. Some expert P(doom)ers maintain that that threshold magnitude is much higher: e.g., Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares in their 2025 book entitled If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies. IMHO, the question is not “to be or not to be”, but, proximately and more specifically, to be or not to be governed by projected Anima identifications or by projected Animus identifications, or, moreover, to be or not to be flummoxed by squabbles between these two sets -- one vacationing in Islandia, the other increasingly rooted in Swampland. With a surly attitude like that, my Iambe naturally nods to Vitalik Buterin (with the caveat that _µT_m-processed m-valued LETS nesting-foams should be deployed) over Elon Musk.

By mi[me}sis -- imitating actions of mimetic estrogens like MSG -- of the Born Rule, ₁T₂-only-AI interfacing turns superpositions into hallucinations, as described by University of Exeter's Lucy Osler in her “We're Not Just Receiving AI's Hallucinations, We're Hallucinating With It”, StudyFinds, 16 February 2026. Independent of what bAI (binary AI) will do to the comics, the cartoonists have long since had our Dizzy World civilization most accurately portrayed. When was the last time we had a Secretary of State Against War? Ack, aye, long me[me}time passing, eh what. Whowhat gave the ka-clunking wrecking-ball writ a [man}date? Natural rights to what? Breathe clean air, drink potable water? Long since violated by ₁T₂-only-science's infra-techno-industrial-cum-₁T₂-only-capitalism's spinoffs. Sustained, however, into the 21st century has been the natural right to growth over the “free” land of successive frontiers, old and new, in near-abroad unto far-flung living-space Lebenswelts. COC: Contempt Of Congress mistaken for west-more-land's first-floor Command Operations Center. The Sting (1973) prefigured the Afghan sting (1979) followed by the PersianGulfWar Iraq sting (1990) such that one just has to wonder if Indigo Slam's Ukraine-mafia counterfeiters of USDs (1997) inspired the BOed Orange Maiden's Ukraine sting (2013). Binarily speaking, does HW-cum-PF wag the state, or does the state wag Hollywood and popular fiction? Call in all the solitary-walker Clints, the Clints from east-of-the-woods; call in a ton of Clints. No matter. Call in a freed man named Larry. Too latte-- uh, uh, late. Way too late. Gone, baby, gone: shush -- well before blackhawk went down. Reductive Alter{EgoSpheric] An{I/i^ma] mi[me}sis of _µT_m-identity-transparency. A loss among many losses ill[lust}rating just how very anti-homeostatically potent schmaltzy black-qua-self propaganda can be, if not is always. As much as -- particularly Asian, but also as promulgated in medical schools -- memorization.edu is currently de[mean}ed, still, it must be admitted that its origins were clearly resident in pandemic pre-printing-press oral transmission and the necessity to guard against (not then malicious c-viruses and e-hacking) conveyance of the corruption-of-words always [pre}sent due to the pre[pen}chant for-- gee-whiz, the [n-self}-serving Popperian predilections-proclivities-propensities overt in T_[and}trick, uh, uh, Tantric Schrödinger's m-valued-statefunction codification of animistic-pagan “participation mystique” ID-transparency. Gurdjieff-cum-Ouspensky-cum-Nicoll said it in the Law-of-Sevens terms of missing diatonic semitones, but the fact of the matter, of whatsoever the matter, is that regressed-archetypal gradients of the collective unconscious -- constellated and personified by individual-mass-collective processes of projective-identification at multileveled transference dynamics -- do not leave oppositions unscathed: origin of “no good deed goes unpunished”, a virtual natural law of human nature inculcated by the normopathy glutamatergically anchored under orchestration delivered by prescriptive enculturation-socialization beginning in the womb (TPTB-knee-jerk response being to find a way to get rid of the womb via advent-and-use of, surely AIed, “extracorporeal gestation devices”; whereas, the intelligent response would be to get rid of the-- prescription). Just think about our -- archived for all of memetime -- wag[on}ing-of-the-folk CartoonWorld pictures: an e[moll}i/ain't [Hit}her died in his [bunk}her; whereas, a lugubrious [Stall}him's progeny went on to too long occupy Wollyubong. If denial of Lukasiewicz logics by a knee-jerked probability-amplitude interpretation was the Witch Bull of the 20th century and the straw that broke the camel's back in regards to etiology an pathogenesis of the WWII battle of the 200-Years War of the World, then we can see the Trickster archetype at work in the fact that Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction was a Germanic riddle, encoded into an enigma machine, the mystery of which was wrapped up by promulgation of a born rule. No wonder the ₂T₂-logical invasion of Poland from both sides analogically embodied -- by ConveDD: by, that is, conversion-disorder displacement -- a 2-state superposition!

I've always laughed about how it only took less than a decade after losing the (forced-draft-urbanized, free-fire-zoned, agent-oranged, Rome-plowed, daisy-cuttered, Puff-the-magic-dragoned, CBUed) fight -- in n-hats-fused-cum-n-AKAs-multi-identity “participation mystique's” Indian Country -- with the Viet Cong, who could not be adequately localized so as to allow us to fff-them (“find'em, fix'em, and finish'em”: indeed, even their Cambodia Parrot's Beak COSVN headquarters was sufficiently animistically-pagan-macroscopically-quantum nonlocal as to be so full of “an inherent ill-definedness” as to be inherently unbombable!), for “spontaneous fusion” of the m-valued Schrödinger wavefunction to be GRW redefined (circa 1982) as CSL (1989), continuous spontaneous localization (quoting Google's AI: the lurid, indeed, so fraught with Lebenswelt challenge as eventually to encompass type-A manspreading, “…widely spread-out wave function suddenly 'fuses' into a tightly localized wave packet”), the ₁T₂-only statistical-ensemble random qua “noise”, layered and latticed, postulated there associated with, I would argue is actually Schrödinger's m-valuedness (spread-out, not just “widely”, but over the whole universe) _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly processed. By 1996, this fusion as reduction-localization-collapse had been Doisi-Ghirardi-Penrose objectified via a gravitational instability of the superpositioning of Schrödinger's m-values, or as Google's AI has it: “The wave function collapses to reduce this gravitational energy, 'fusing' the two distinct locations into one” such that “In the Schrödinger-Newton equation, the collapse often results in a stable, localized wave packet called a soliton.” Well-- always having been far more interested in psychopolitical geology than in political geography -- there being no interest in identifying and taking down those or that whowhat set this operation and that operation in motion to begin with; and, moreover, being well aware that learnable lessons learned by some, but subsequently widely deep-unlearned, from the VN war's Phoenix Progrom were: you sting us, we'll sting you; you snatch us, we'll snatch you -- I've been attending to the audience e-amphitheatering our BadBunny-communicated and AI-robot-Kungfu-breakdanced post-postmodern comic Greek tragedy, wherein “the main action has been the mainstream legacy media presence”, uh, if you like. So, delving deeper than deep-learned AI, we quote Penrose's above-linked paper “On Gravity's role…” concerning how easily skirted are Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time-executed demergence (qua spontaneous reduction-localization-collapse) and remergence (the spelling-checker coconspirator to AI wants this to be “reemergence” -- and keeps changing it back, along with promulgating the “spontaneous” insertion of hyperlinks making the whole document dysfunctional) as Schrödinger-memetime-independent (that's not simple-“stationary”) authentic “spontaneous fusion” of the statefunction:

It is argued that the definition of the time-translation operator for the superposed space-times involves an inherent ill-definedness, leading to an essential uncertainty in the energy of the superposed state which, in the Newtonian limit, is proportional to the gravitational self-energy… of the difference between the two mass distributions.

Since Roger Penrose's “Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe” places no reality value upon _µT_m-valued logics, let alone those remerging _CT_C+ly-unto-_C+T_C+, how surprising is it that the memetime “translation operator for the superposed space-times involves an inherent ill-definedness”, i.e., an uncertainty proportional to (i.e., therefore, pretty -- even ₁T₂ly speaking -- certain) the gravitational (i.e., spacetime curvature) interaction with its own “field”, the calculation of the energy of which (i.e., of the uncertain proportion -- of the [Viet Cong] _µT_mly-processed n-selves-energy to the ₁T₂ly-processed single-self-energy) allows renormalization (uh, flatlining) of the masses, uh, that is, in the Newtonian limit?

What I experienced (beginning aged 8) sitting, preferentially in wind-blown (fuusei) rain ((amadare: the auditory qua “musicogenic” trigger-stimulus to the so-called “absences” [i.e., the ₁T₂-absences functionally prerequisite to the learning of _µT_m-presences] being different from Toru Takemitsu's “Munari by Munari” rendition of intricate, self-similar, chaotic, non-linear, time-interval, fractal-drip-dynamic aural structures: but check out the graphic score to the piece as being evocative of the God-playing-hide-and-seek-from-itherhimself cosmic-refusal-into-refuge Abfall-dripped-Gödel-numbering of the Gödel numbers numbering multi-sheeted BackCloth of MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space: quoting Martin Krahn quoting Hegel, p. 61, “Externality in Hegel's Philosophy of Nature”, Ph.D. dissertation, Duquesne University, December 2018, “…nature has also been regarded as the Idea's refuse [Abfall] from itself, insofar as the idea as this shape of externality is inadequate to itself…”, Krahn's bracket addition)), on the “sacred place” -- pine-tree mount, circa 1953-6; memorial stone which I found, circa 1990, by following the defunct railway bed which had become a utilities easement -- fixedly staring through the Platonia[call}y-misty ma-fog-dynamic at the rice-paddy-expanse supporting Midori Gaoka, and occasionally whilst climbing up and walking over the fox-spirited and hocchiku-fluted surrounding hills (((check out the mid-20th-century Zen monk Watazumi Doso Roshi and his watazumido system [[herein Julia Kristeva abjection-contextualized by Zachary Wallmark, Ethnomusicology Review, 17, 2012; and critiqued relative to Kristeva abjection, such abjection being “…reliant upon a strictly policed binary logic founded on the fundamental duality between 'I' and 'not-I'…” by James Rhys Edwards, UCLA eScholarship, 2012, not to mention the ₁T₂-only duality between in-the-body-experience and OBE, lack of OBE renormalization being the foremost precipitator-sustainer of memetime-boundedness: J.Kris.abject is consonant with the Anima-projecting qua ani[man}i/ack!all logocentric cartoonish technocrat's ever-growing normopathic-unto-Nazi[i}tight-psychotic compensatory-abreactive obsession-compulsion with single-valued-identity verification, this O-C being the case because the technonerds, by projective-identification, have created an environment within which they can justify to themselves their obsession-compulsion -- the animated Nazi Erdgiest version having been OCDed with the “purified identity” ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of quantum-non-simple-identity qua the Rassenhygiene conceptualized doctrine of Blut und Boden, Renaissance-unto-nowadays contextualized in The Peasant Against the Machine: A Hidden History of Anti-Capitalist Mysticism from Luther to Hitler to Neo-Marxism, Ferenc Lengyel, book preprint snippets posted to ResearchGate, March 2025, the subject, if not Lengyel's every take, of interest to my Iambe as a nurseryman tree Digger, mother's maiden family name being Baumgardner -- as quantum non-simple-identity has been, and is, more and more thoroughly demonstrated to be nature's way at all scale levels; I now, March of 2026, require a cell phone to check my email on my laptop and my laptop to check my email on my cell phone; soon biomarkers, including DNA signature; foreseeably, a CBI implant, and the devil alone knows what else in the way of yuk-yuck-yuckering futz-up heh-heh-heh l/auf{her}ings ConveDDing reverse-cascade Aufhebung sublates]], a 1950s efflorescence which I can attest suffused the hills above the house in which I lived))) was characterized visually by what, I imagine, Sri Aurobindo called “Sri Aurobindo's light” (see, especially his Letters on Yoga) and what AutogenicTraining's Wolfgang Luthe called a “bright-light state” ((see: [1] specifically about bright-light states, “Chapter 9: Unusual Brightness and Related Phenomena”, Autogenic Therapy, Vol. VI, W. Luthe, Grune and Stratton, 1973; and [2] Luthe's article entitled “The Clinical Significance of Visual Phenomena During the Autogenic State”, in Autogenic Training [book reviewed here], W. Luthe, ed., Grune and Stratton, 1965, for, taken together with [1], the most elaborate treatment I've seen of this area of experience evocative of hyperphantasiacal inner-Musculpt)). Even though I early-on was a ghostwriter for a clinical neurologist (Falls Church, circa early-1970s), and later briefly a transcriptionist for a neuropsychiatrist (Beverly Hills, circa late-1990s), only recently have I become aware that during the last two decades there have been some neurological researches done in respect to this area, but inner-Musculpt does not seem to have been specifically broached (see, for instance: “Phantasia --The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes”, Adam Zeman, et al., Cortex, 130, September 2020, pp. 426-40). “On the Brightening of Subjective Luminosity in Ganzflicker Meditation: A Dual Pathway Hypothesis”, Pete Carr, Academia, preprint, no date given but 2025 or later by References, discusses Luthe's findings. Also provided with the Carr preprint posting are abstracts to medical-neurological-psychological-metaphysical papers in related areas: the “afterglow phenomenon”; the “aura viewing”; the compounding of the ₁T₂-afterimage as invite to _µT_m-superpositioning, generally rejected even if the compounding was stare-induced; the Dasein “being-there” sense of presence, not VRed, but RVed iff the values are not of ₁T₂-only but of _µT_m; the in-the-self-located-owned-body-cum-viewing-Doppelganger autoscopy; the my-face-absent-in-the-mirror-all-else-present-as-reflected negative autoscopy, not to mention the “mirror-that-smokes” when one's face-in-the-mirror suddenly _µT_m-identity-transparently iterates shape-shifts to one-after-another all the other faces of humanity for as long as one stands there transfixed by the fast-flickering images: see the final autogenic-abreaction “scene” of our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh; the my-me-in-2-unto-n-bodies-at-once he-he-he… heautoscopy; the delusional misidentification; the aphantasia (predisposing to projective-identification of-with the Anima!) of so many logicians, mathematicians, physicists; the so on. A study of the effects of artificial induction of visual imagery (rather primitive by comparison to that presenting during autogenic abreactions) is described in “Visual hallucinations induced by Ganzflicker and Ganzfeld differ in frequency, complexity, and content”, Oris Shanyan, et al., Scientific Reports, 14, article number 2353, 29 November 2024. The “predictive processing” and “aberrant salience” theories of imagery generation, not only to say “hallucination pathophysiology”, are described and critiqued in “Refining mechanistic models of hallucinations for enhanced translatability”, Justin Buck and Kiyohito Ligaya and Guillermo Horga, Translational Psychiatry, 16, article number 31, 3 December 2025. Not much in the above-linked by way of lead-ins to holographic techno-exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as _µT_m-logical-cognition-facilitating mathematical notation and user-friendly interface to m-valued LETS nesting-foams _µT_mly processed, eh. However, I found Carr's dual-pathway-model paper most “illuminating” -- heh-heh-heh! -- even though my experience considerably diverges from specifics of that thesis. My bright-light state experiences were not drug-induced, nor did I employ Ganzfeld, flicker, or ganzflicker inducements. My Luthe-“very bright light phase” non-experiential (as described in our novel, Moon, if registration of the state as experientially happening occurred, that registration quenched the state, à la Gurdjieff cum Aurobindo, dimmed and brightened as the incoming thought-registration was G-“said 'I' to” or A-allowed to “pass on by” unacknowledged-as-self-originated) beings-there so-called “absences” always were sitting-contemplative lapsed into, most elaborately -- post-childhood -- during nightly practice of A-“concentration in self-observation” qua G-“inner-separation”, of-from, say, the faculties employed in the act of reading, the most elaborate such case followed by a fully-conscious grand mal seizure (when I discussed this with Luthe in Kyoto, circa 1977, he viewed it as PTSD-resolution related and did not question the “fully-conscious” aspect of the seizure). I was also during the early-1970s intensely practicing self-observation qua inner-separation of-from G-“moving center” faculties, using the digging-and-balling of trees alone in the field, and staged over months-to-years nemawashi root-pruning (I don't find anything on www-dot knowledgably describing what is actually done), 8-to-10-hours/day 4-to-5-days/week as the meditation format. During the same early-1970s period, I daily engaged in one hour of walking meditation wherein I practiced inner-separation from sensory functions, e.g., “Today, we see as many shades of green as possible, whilst all else is inner-distance-placed into a background space.” Carr talks “alpha-mediated cortical suppression of the primary visual pathway” as one mode, which seems like it possibly could have been involved in the inner-distance-placement, but the lifting out of the background space of “as many shades of green as possible” does not seem to me to have been involved in Carr's mode-two “secondary retinotectal visual pathway” and certainly was not hallucinogenic secondary to E.Jacobson “differential relaxation” unto electromyograph near-zero action-potential of the small extra-ocular (think: eye-movement reprogramming) and laryngeal (think: associative roof-brain-chatter reprogramming unto G-“inner-stop” of the “always chuntering on about” over which my ego-'I'-ness has little control beyond the momentary) muscles. One afternoon a week was devoted to self-observation qua inner-separation of-from K.Nicolaides gesture sketching and as-slow-as-possible contour drawing from the nude model (see discussions of this in our novel, Moon). My experiences during the early-'70s of Luthe-“bright color phase” were associated with studio art activities, including attempts to paint music, as well as modern-dance-class exercises, in context of the meditation practices indicated above; some of the most elaborate bright-color cases occurring during intellectual conversations. Reverse-telescoping derealization-Plexiglas-walled onsets were spontaneous, usually initialized by photismic point-array flashes yielding network patterns doffing barrettes as if top hats going into nonplussed-qua-surminussed fractal cascades and blurring-out to color-field washes, with the color-fields moving to foreground and all else receding into the background space, the color fields going into “dynamic polymorph” -- to use Luthe terminology -- forms that “picked up” auditory gestalts, and from there became inner-Musculpt. Sometimes auditory gestalts musicogenically triggered the point-photism onsets. Appearance of the inner-Musculpt, it seems to me, could possibly have been involved with “something” fulfilling what Carr's “secondary retinotectal visual pathway” is conceived to achieve (Luthe proposed a CSDS, centrencephalic safety-discharge system, as orchestrator of autogenic discharge activity), but the idea that the semantic imports of inner-Musculpt symbolically carried by the dynamic audiovisual shape-shifts demonstrate, quoting Carr's page 14, a “…connection to the evolutionarily ancient 'primary consciousness' (Merker, 2007; Panksepp & Biven, 2012) or 'core consciousness' (Damasio, 1999) of the midbrain [italic emphasis added by me] which is present in all mammals and underpins cortical elaborations…” seems to me a misdirection in being ₁T₂-only conceived, whereas E.Postian _µT_m, IMHO due to the Husserliana-presented superposed-walkaround AnalyticalCubist-like imagery and aural-thematic stacking, is almost certainly involved and indicative of wave-effect OBEed-nonlocal quantum-brain analog processing (“peripherally” -- i.e., IBEed-local ₁T₂-only largely-digital molecular-cellular brains being primarily receiver-transmitter processors -- facilitated by intraneuronal and intraperineural DNA radiation exchange processes?). When, at the McMaster U. Velikovsky conference, circa 1974, I described to Cornell tornadogenesis modeler, Douglas A. Paine (who had just delivered a paper entitled, “The Universal Nature of Discharge Phenomena”), “the color fields going into 'dynamic polymorph' -- to use Luthe terminology -- forms that 'picked up' auditory gestalts”, he, with some excitement, immediately stated how much neph charts (nephanalysis of clouds and rain, air masses and fronts) had always seemed to him so similar to brain scans, and then went on to describe to me the acoustically-modified-gravity-wave-mode signaturing of theta-e equivalent potential temperature constant entropy surfaces at reverse-cascade, which he had begun in graduate school to laboriously hand-plot in 3D-projections (that grad-school period being before such plotting was computerized): later -- especially due to the handling of hypercomplex and complex angular momentum as topologically-active operator-time's 3-fold temporal CURL -- we took this m-valued-wavefunction-functional-functoral infrasound signaturing to be an example of atmospheric music-sculpture, the computerized forecast model's dot-exe instruction being named “Musculpt”. What types of topo-operators constitute Musculpt.exe? was a question for technical generalization of the forecast model (a question we did not have the opportunity to properly investigate). My orientation to this question was established as early as November of 1963 in reading of the null-vector-defined, J.G.Bennettian, non-selfsame when projected “pencil of skew-parallels” and flashing on how this Bennett notion was the best thing I'd come across as explanation of my altered-identity-immersion “absence” ex[per}i/ences as a child in the rice fields of Midori Gaoka. At Cornell, I saw a correspondence between fiber bundles of Clifford algebras and J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels”, but the Cornell situation evaporated, circa 1980, before that correspondence could be seriously looked at. Recently making a stab at this, however, I find a 1980 paper (details way over my head) tantalizingly addressing issues Paine and I then very-surface touched upon: “Clifford Bundles, Immersions of Manifolds and the Vector Field Problem”, H. B. Lawson, Jr. and M. L. Michelsohn, Journal of Differential Geometry, 15, pp. 237-67, to wit, quoting the Introduction section:

The point of this article is to present a simple and unified approach to both the immersion problem and the vector field problem for manifolds by using the formalism of Clifford bundles… The method… recaptures, for example, all the non-immersion and non-embedding theorems known to date concerning complex and quaternion projective spaces… In general outline, our approach is the following. To any Riemannian manifold X there is naturally associated a bundle… whose fiber at a point x is the Clifford algebra of the tangent space… One now studies bundles of modules over this bundle of algebras. To any such bundle of modules M with an appropriate connection one can associate an elliptic, first order differential operator D which we call the Dirac operator of M. If X is oriented and even-dimensional, there is a simple decomposition M = …

And on from there to “fundamental theorems for immersions” and “applications to complex and quaternionic projective varieties” and so on and so forth. But, the “real n-dimensional vector bundle”, even if it “carries a spin structure”, does not correspond to the “null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian 'pencil of skew-parallels'” which carries, using Bennett's words, “identity in diversity”, uh, that is, in my terminology, the “non-selfsameness incumbent upon _µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency”. Even though Luthe terminology appears -- i.e., “polyforms” -- higher-order differential operators upon complex manifolds are not, as late as four years ago, characterized relative to “_µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency” decomposed by 3-fold topo-active optime's temporal CURLs (quantized via spinors extended point-to-ray-qua-pencil-qua-fiber by Penrose twistors?), as seen in “Notes on Spinors and Polyforms I: General Case”, Niren Bhoja and Kirill Krasnov, arXiv, 10 May 2022, to wit, quoting the abstract:

The construction proceeds by choosing a complex structure J on R^(2n). Spinors are then polyforms on one of the two totally-isotropic subspaces C^n that arise as eigenspaces of J. There is a similar description in the split signature case Cl(n,n), with differential forms now being those on R^n. In this case the model is constructed by choosing a paracomplex structure I on R^(n,n), and spinors are polyforms on one of the totally null eigenspaces R^n of I. The main purpose of the paper is to describe the geometry of an analogous construction in the case of a general Clifford algebra…

Even in the C^n case, so handled, the sense of quantum non-simple identity is not found apparent. That such considerations arise -- and are of concern as regards evaluation of anthropogenic inputs -- relative to cascade theory of tornadogenesis can be seen if it be understood that alterations of the response characteristics of frequency windows of Earth's atmosphere at greatest issue in cascade theory are not those induced by radiofrequency radiation but induced by the angular momentum carried by the solar wind (see: here; and here; and here), specifically the hypercomplex and complex components. Anthropogenic changes of gas ratios, for instance, could alter frequency-window responses to angular momentum inputs carried to Earth's upper atmosphere by the solar wind -- these inputs being understood as initializers of cascades in the Paine-Kaplan nested-grid numerical-forecast model of tornadogenesis. How ramified are the involved issues is clearly illustrated by S. P. Mayer's 1 January 1979 U. of Wisconsin dissertation entitled “Angular momentum in curved spacetimes”, and how very much more than merely ramified when considering past-null-infinity-to-future-null-infinity memetime-bound “Observer dependence of angular momentum in general relativity and its relationship to the gravitational-wave memory effect”, Eanna E. Flanagan and David A. Nichols, Physical Review D, 92:8, October 2015, which are dependencies far less ramified than are the memetime-independent _C+T_C+-corpora of POVs Platonia-extant on MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space.

“The fact that two historians can present two such divergent interpretations after so much…” -- to quote Jonathan Haslam, Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, writing “Soviet‐German Relations and the Origins of the Second World War: The Jury Is Still Out”, The Journal of Modern History, 69:4, December 1997, pp. 785-97 (and still way-O-way out 30 years later, after 58 years following the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact!) -- what, so much of what? Rummaging through all-balled-up surface-structure evidence absent Ariadne's logical method threading into labyrinthine deep-structure cause-pushes/attractor-pulls (so-called globaloney debates in midst of the crises pretty much limited to the tactical level, strategy barely touched upon, grand strategy never publicly mentioned, the notion that [f}actors the principle actors are unconscious of are the main determinants of their decisions going altogether unconsidered): documents made public after the fact; current and later characterizations of events; prefigurative, concurrent, and ex post facto rationalizations of important unintelligent decisions made based significantly upon veiled-specifically-requested intelligence much of which is altogether plausibly-deniably fabricated, rationalizations made by the actors themselves, their close associates, those with axes then-and-later to grind; commentaries, amateur and professional, made concerning the rationalizations developed with regard to largely irrationally-motivated-unto-fully-hysterically-driven individual-mass-collective behaviors; cherry picking of opened-up archives stuffed from before the events of interest until well after those events with documents created and/or fashioned specifically to service-the-rationalizations unto outright mislead. My I/i^m say that such divergences come from variations (largely derivative of the arrays of physiological, psychological, temperamental types) in cultivations of projective-identifications at transference, does such sayers say -- eh, what! Ack, aye, understandadadly, the cajoled-assimilation-to-global-monoculture instigated (monism having been big, not only in post-Abel-Impossibility-Theorem-cum-post-Cantor-partwhole-identity-transparency Wilhelmina/Wilhelmine Germany, but also during the Weimar runup to Nazification) and enforced insistence upon closed-decoherent, single-valued-qua-bodied, unipolar (forget the eros of civilization, as suppression-generative-of-repression of psychological quality at sexual congress, construed as civilization-autopoiesis-and-maintenance-by-sublimation, is Aufhebung[ed]-sublated to _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state identity-transparency by the Unconscious as Infinite Sets), Cartesian-Newtonian planetary governance (think, say, the Concerted of EUrope League of Nations and progeny: war-wise, governance-wise, trade-wise), as opposed to open-coherent, n-valued-qua-bodied, polycentric, Planck-Fröhlich self-organizing quantum-composites, is clearly -- “The lady doth protest too much, methinks”: [ham}let, [pill}age, [to}own, [sit}he, megaUR[bane}reG[i}on, forced-draft mega[lop}off/i/nati/on -- one case, methinks, of deep-structure OCDed-fixation upon the many possible ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements, of ₁T₂-only logic as collective-unconscious compensatory abreaction to the BornRuled scuttling of the Postian-_µT_m-logic understanding of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction (and the hisstorical predecessors of that scuttling-by-ConveDDs going back at least to archaic Greece: an End-of-History apparent recentering of the decentered, and attempts to sustain that unipolarity, belie the generally accepted notion that it took approximately a century and a half -- Copernicus's 1543 De Revolutionibus to Newton's 1687 Principia -- for the decentering Copernican view to supplant the centering Ptolemaic; moreover, persistence at cultivation of the myth of a “classical limit”, a perseverance necessary to maintenance of the Cartesian-Newtonian institutional base, belies the generally accepted notion that the quantum-relativity view has superseded that Cartesian-Newtonian). Though there was and is every manner of rationalization of that scuttling, the most fund[a}mental impetus was and is the glutamate-etched inability to integrate multi-level -- intrapsychic, intersexual, intrafamilial, analysand-analyst, candidate-preceptor, sociopolitical, mindbody, subject-object, IBE-OBE -- transference dynamics adequate to cognitively place ₁T₂-modes of introception-proprioception-perception in their actual-to-nature position as the lowest logical-value order-type of _µT_m-modes of introception-proprioception-perception. Umwelt introjections: my world, my country, my company, my family, my body, myself (and for the intrasubjectively adept: the [my}selves superordinate to my-claimed-egoic-selfhood). Especially: my “octonionic-senses” of being in-my-body! Fear and loathing of, abject hysteria at, implosion upon the suicidal impulse to…: “Give me simple-identity, or give me death!” Denials thereof, uh, uh, of simply-identifiable-₁T₂-only-logical predicates of I-am-me-and-only-me, being fundamental fourth-declension impetuses to WAR instigated by all those malfactorial-cum-reprobational baddies who would deny me ontic access to my prescriptively-enculturated, beginning-in-the-womb, glutamate-etchings! Contravention of any Lebenswelt belief sublating my corpus of Umwelt introjections experienced as life-threatening -- no difference whatsoever, intra-subjectively and physiological-fight-or-flight-rushed-interoceptively as experienced-in-immediacy, from coming under AK-fire, night missions, token American, Mekong delta, circa 1967.

Intellectual abste[mon/i}ousness in denial, still, sorry, but, lacking sanguinity or not, I couldn't possibly air my trifling thoughts and uninformed WAGs about phase3-monotonically-induced current GreatGame events, other than, absent ulterior motives, to desultorily observe that, clearly, heh-heh-heh!: (1) the long-running U.S. strategic offensive draws inspiration from American-Football halftime white-chalk-on-blackboard X's-plus-arrows coaching sessions; and (2) Russia is long-view move-contemplating at the playing of Chess; and (3) China is long-B&R whole-board-cognizant in making placements at the game of Go.

Craig Tindale's cascade theory of a prolonged S-of-H shutoff (see: “Systemic Risk: A 12-Order Cascading Analysis Of A Zero-Flow Strait Of Hormuz Closure”, ZeroHedge, 6 March 2026) is the best piece I've read on resource warfare in context of the presiding planetary n-dimensional anthropogenic crisis. More than that, it illustrates dominance of surface-structure over deep-structure cause-push/attractor-pull in prevailing notions as to the form of process, a mindset dominance (see: “Nurturing a Data-Driven Mindset for Data-Driven Transformation: A Conceptualization and Research Framework”, Minh Tay Huynh and Marjaana Gunkel and Valerio Veglio, Strategic Change, 29 May 2025) long cultivated by dot-edu and currently being greatly enhanced by the gathering focus upon AI-assisted big data analytics, a dominance which will not be substantively ameliorated by inauguration of 2-state-superposed quantum-₂T₂-processors, that's, uh, dumvirate, uh, uh, duumvirate-CPUs: the data-driven technocratic shift in emphasis from abstract thought (think: Paine-Kaplan hypercomplex-complex angular-momentum cascade theory and computer forecast modeling of tornadogenesis) to the operational intelligence on display in the two above-linked articles greatly magnifies devolutional virulence of glutamate-anchored ₁T₂-only-logic-alone, even when it is taken to ₂T₂ employed so as to yield faster ₁T₂-processing. If and when programmable ₁T₂-only CBDCs, linked to this and that type of -- G6 or G7 CBI-qua-implantable -- SCSSs cum IoTs _impT_{ie/mentalation}, are deployed, they will be compensatory-abreactive regressed expressions of the largely subliminal Umwelt-unto-Lebenswelt hysteria normopathically induced ((maintenance of the "individual" egofunction's resoluteness with regard to the mistaken claim to non-quantum "absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct", a la Hubert Benoit, identity, requires perseverance in the assertion that there exists a "classical limit", without which the BornRuled probability-amplitude interpretation could not plausibly sustain ostensible viability of the ever increasingly inadequate Cartesian-Newtonian institutional base in face of the untrammeled gorging upon dissimulated-quantum-based infratechnologies)) by the quantum-non-simple-identity imports of the _µT_m-valued logics of the Schrödinger-m-valued-statefunction-mediated collective and cooperative processes of autopoiesis and self-organization ((see the Festschrift volume devoted to the work of Herbert Fröhlich, particularly Herbert A. Pohl's article on the “New Biophysics of Cooperativity”: I've always felt that our 1979 paper on superconductant DNA pi-electron-parcel-gas radiation exchange processes would have been a nice complement to E. W. Prohofsky's on coherent excitations running along DNA's sugar-phosphate backbone)) inherent to nature's omnium gatherum -- _µT_m-processed transactions of Schrödinger-m-valued-LETS nesting-foams, bottom-up open-source e-commons m-scenarios computer gamed, being non-regressed expressions of nature's ways. There have been so m-many regressed expressions, never has “far to look” for examples been the case: e.g., however much the Soviet ₃T₄ tank owed to Nazi T_[no}logy T_[ran}fears, it was decisive in the decisive Cursted Saylienette skirmish of the WWII B_addle of the 200-Years War of the World. Murphy's Law is the least of it; for, the Trickster A-type is ever-and-omni [pre}sent in each and every regressed expression of what ought never to have been suppressed. Heh-heh-heh!

I've taken note of the EEG-fMRI-PET research (see, e.g., “Human brain effects of DMT assessed via EEG-fMRI”, Christopher Timmermann, et. al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120:13, 20 March 2023) being conducted on the imagistic brain-mind bulletins generated by the DMT-intoxicated ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular localized brain, but as yet have seen reported nothing resembling what I drug-free experienced as inner-Musculpt, nothing beyond i-MuS initialization-stage phenomena, e.g., quoting Wiki and Google'sAIs with their too-many-lines-long URLs: “…shifting, intricately detailed geometric patterns, wavy sheets, and kaleidoscopic, vibrant colors”; and “Brightness Enhancements: Colors and patterns are often described as being extraordinarily bright and saturated”; and “…having a deep three-dimensional, or even multi-dimensional, quality” (I regard the n-dimensional claim as being euphemistic of a misapprehension, because the binary-mind takes a lot of mathematical training to recognize schematic depictions of n-dimensional polytopes as being what they are); and “Tunnel Vision: Peripheral vision may become blurred while central vision remains sharp” ((at i-MuS initialization, as described in n-versions in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, there is a wrong-end reverse-telescope zump-zump-zump inner-distancing cascade yielding an “inch-thick” Plexiglas-wall-derealization effect that shifts the consensus audiovisual field (the “real” world) into a background space quantum-subposition-suplation, the oncoming inner-Musculpt entering at the forefront of ontic awareness: sitting, walking, eyes open or closed, meditating, listening, discoursing, drawing, painting, m-dance exercising, digging trees)); and “Spatial Enlargement: Nearby visual space, particularly in the periphery, may appear to enlarge” (((experientially speaking, I regard this claim as being epiphenomenal to conflation of “feeling space” to binocular visual space [“periphery” and “enlarge” being visual{cortex}transmogrification of the sense of inner-distancing associated with the “autogenic shift” from ergotropic outer-directed extroversion to trophotropic inner-directed introversion -- sociology of ₁T₂-only-capitalist business culture following this transmogrification of outer to inner, as given per here and here and here -- where the inner-distancing, sensorially-₁T₂-paradoxically, but conforming to dictates of Special Relativity, accompanied by memetime-slowdown, occasions empathic crashing-in of, very significantly, most particularly, others, to a far lesser degree, objects, therefore not exclusively a binocular visual space result, which is thus, clearly, a “feeling-space”-based phenomenon, incidentally sometimes accompanied by presentation of Analytical-Cubism-type “psychoideographs” of the others crashing-in, as described in our novel, “Moon”] by cognitive somewhos unaccustomed to thought being conducted exclusively on the basis of accommodation of “feeling-tones”, presence of such non-₁T₂-logical accommodation [what logical-value-order-types of accommodation are involved?] having archaically-longlonglong-since been preferentially devolved by ontic experiential induction to those biologically equipped for carrying-a-child-induced-identity-transparency, i.e., in moment-to-moment everyday pedestrian experience -- the bioengineered termination of which would have… well, you tell me what the consequences would be!))); and “…surfaces shifting and rearranging themselves in real-time” ((this being a move toward inner-Musculpt where within semantics are in the shape-shifts much more than in the shapes shifted -- but the presupposition that the “shifting” transpires in “real-time”, rather than being executed memetime-independently by 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, may, in part, be responsible for absence of conscious awareness of the semantic domain [despite, quoting Timmerman, et al.,: “Regions with the densest expression of serotonin 2A receptors… were most affected by DMT, and overlapped with regions related to evolved cognitive functions such as language and semantic processing”], a multi-sheeted Riemann-surface-like m-valued-function-functional-functor domain likely involving mappings of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logical propositions numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers)). There are many papers by now in the literature of neurological research on DMT ((e.g., “Psychological and physiological effects of extended DMT”, Lisa X. Luan, et al., Journal of Psychopharmacology, 38:1, 28 October 2023, pp. 56-67, which reports on investigations of dose regimens; and “Rapid effects of tryptamine psychedelics on perceptual distortions and early visual cortical population receptive fields”, Marta Lapo Pais, et al., NeuroImage, 297, 15 August 2024, wherein, by use of visual stimulation, quoting:

The visual stimuli consisted of two perpendicular bars moving simultaneously in opposite directions, exposing a high-contrast randomly chosen RGB-coloured checkerboard pattern. In the first half of the stimulus run, the horizontal bars move vertically downwards across the display… At the same time, the vertical bars moved horizontally leftwards across the display… After that, a blank period of mean luminance… Finally, in the second half of the stimulus run, horizontal and vertical bars performed the same cycles in opposite directions… Participants were instructed to maintain their attention and fixation on a central dot that changed colours at random intervals between red and green while ignoring the surroundings (moving bars).

it is demonstrated that the population receptive field of the visual cortex is enlarged with DMT inhalation, interpreted as explaining visual space expansion at the periphery)). This bar stimulation of the DMT intoxicated is a primitive of the DolphinSpeak stimulation I began advocating -- during the mid-1970s -- be delivered to members of a SmartDress-dancewear-appareled human EscherFormDance pod tasked with learning dolphin sonic-visioning as an aid to developing techno-exteriorized inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation and user-friendly interface to _µT_m-processed m-valued LETS nesting-foams. The DolphinSpeak stimulation was to be delivered in a graphics-interactive-and-music-synthesizer computerized, biofeedback-and-holographic-display-dome-equipped isolation-flotation Lilly tank, such that the stimulated sonic-visionings could be recorded, stored, and systematically analyzed as an aid to development-through-use of holographic techno-exteriorized inner-Musculpt. Indeed, we thought that invention of the Moog synthesizer in Trumansburg, NY, was a strong enough stimulus that, during 1976, I wired a large electrical service into the barn at Doug Paine's Trumansburg farmstead, our intent being to use the space as a workshop for development of such a Lilly tank; but Paine's tornadogenesis-modeler situation at Cornell fell apart (he being de facto deemed persona non grata at the NSF due to demonstrating, during 1974, that acoustic blackhole analogues exist in Earth's atmosphere) and we were never subsequently able to bring up this project. But the neurology-of-DMT paper I've found most interesting is: “DMT alters cortical travelling waves”, Andrea Alamia, et al., eLife, 9:e59784, 12 October 2020. Quoting the section entitled “Is there a correlation between waves and subjective reports?”:

We investigated whether changes in travelling waves under DMT correlated with the subjective effects of the drug… Taken together with previous results from visual stimulation experiments independent of DMT, these data strongly support the principle that cortical travelling waves (and increased FW waves in particular) correlate with the conscious visual experiences, whether induced exogenously (via direct visual stimulation) or endogenously (visionary or hallucinatory experiences).

This statement is suggestive with regard to my notion that ₁T₂-only-molecular-cellular brains are input-output peripherals with lowest-only-logical-value-order-type processing capabilities (in post-internet-advent terminology: workstation peers whereover all types of p2p exchanges are limited to the binary order-type alone), the _µT_m-non-localizable quantum brain being input-source and output-receiver largely radiation-exchange mediated by the quantum-wave properties of intraneuronal-and-intraperineural-DNA molecules.

The fear and loathing ((see: “Apocalyptic beliefs are no longer fringe -- and they're shaping how people respond to global threats”, Erik Rolfsen, U. of British Columbia News, 5 March 2026; and “Nearly One-Third Of People Living In North America Believe That World Will End During Their Lifetimes”, Michael Snyder, ZeroHedge, 13 March 2026)) may not be only, or even primarily, due to Tripartite Fertile Crescent Religion fundamentalism; these emotions may be outcomes of an accurate acute sense (((see: “Mysterious spikes in Earth's 'heartbeat' are scrambling human brains with an eerie high-pitched ringing”, Chris Melore, Daily Mail, 26 February 2026; and, for a more technical account, with list of scientific paper links, “Schumann Resonance Forecast Today”, MeteoAgent, forecast for March 2026: and think of this being contextualized by the Paine-Kaplan [in Mike's CV, see the early entries to “Refereed Publications” and “Conference Preprints” and “Edited Contract Reports”] understanding of severe-storm-genesis-initializing hypercomplex-complex angular-momentum, handled as Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time, carried by the solar wind, cascaded through Earth's atmosphere, and injected into Earth's crustal and core dynamics))) of the severity of the ever amplifying planetary conundrum (see: “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries”, Katherine Richardson, et al., Science Advances, 9:37, 13 September 2023). Forecasts from as early as the early-1960s (see: “High-resolution 'fingerprint' images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)”, RealClimate, 12 October 2025), extensively discussed at Cornell during the 1970s, as I can personally testify to -- confusingly contradictory to the meteorologically uninformed -- of a localized mini-ice-age caused by a global-warming-induced collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, i.e., the Gulf Stream plus several gyres (see: “Massive system of rotating ocean currents in the North Atlantic is behaving strangely -- and it may be reaching a tipping point”, Sascha Pare, LiveScience, 4 October 2025), continue to have validity even though the breakdown memetime frame remains controversial. However, it may not be much longer now before there arises a general popular feeling for the general-process notion that far-from-equilibrium-phase-transition approaches to critical-state cuspovers visit all extremes, even the extremely normal (see: “US forecasts blizzard, polar vortex, heat dome and atmospheric river all at once”, Seth Borenstein, AP, 14 March 2026). Since the mid-1970s, at least amongst some at Cornell, it has been apparent that it is absence of a supposed “classical limit” -- that limit largely dictated by ₁T₂-only Heisenberg uncertainty relations and Born probability-amplitude auspicates -- and presence of relativistic-quantum composites at all scales, memetemporal and ponderablespatial, that are responsible for a level of superintegration of Earth's various spheres even yet, today, not contemplated by the consensus in Earth sciences. Elicited, by severity of the ever amplifying planetary conundrum, has been, for several examples, a call for a “Universal Declaration of Planetary Rights” (good offices of W. David Kubiak, no date given), invocation of a “life-value turn” as the necessary “next stage of civilization” (see: “Winning the War of the World”, John McMurty, GlobalResearch, 26 February 2026 reposting of the March 2014 article), and proposed in the section entitled “A systemic framework for addressing global anthropogenic impacts on Earth system” of the Katherine Richardson, et al., “planetary boundaries” article linked above, are, to wit, quoting:

There is an urgent need for more powerful scientific and policy tools for analyzing the whole of the integrated Earth system with reliability and regularity and guiding political processes to prevent altering the state of Earth system beyond levels tolerable for today's societies. In addition to more consistent collection and collation of relevant global environmental data, this will require the development of Earth system models that more completely capture geosphere-biosphere-anthroposphere interactions than is the case today.

But even if there were such a declaration, such a turn, such urgent needs fulfilled, by what means would the desired Earth-systems outcomes be concretely achieved? Changes of policies? New regulations? SCSS-type dictatorial impositions, AI-techno-targeting individuals with robotic-coercion massive-data-base-fine-tuned to a degree never before extant, following upon (militarily realized?) actualization of a global mil.intel.com.edu state grown out of the UN and implementation of a single programmable CBDC under auspices of the BIS? Likely, these would result in the evolving conundrum being advanced much more rapidly than it already is. Personally, I can't imagine the desired Earth-systems outcomes, whatever they specifically might evolve to become, being concretely achieved absent implementation of the thesis argued throughout this website regarding a no-reserve-currency quantum-composite unit of account mapping to the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, of the changing topologically-active-operator-time-formalized statefunctions of Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” planet Earth, as progressively made available via initializations ((requiring more than one click, I think: one reason why I advocate holographic techno-exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation facilitating _µT_m-cognition, and as user friendly interface to _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams)) of very-variously-commodity-backed _µT_m-processed m-valued-LETS currencies, currency unit value stacks open-source, e-commons, m-scenarios computer-gamed.

The gen, uh, [apo}deiXis, of the summa [gen}era we hu-hu-[hu}mans have established habitus within, is not a right-to-left reading of the “identity theory of truth”, i.e., “(IT*) For every x, x is a true proposition iff x is a fact” (quoting Marian David, “Truth and Identity”, pp. 124-41, in Meaning and Truth, Joseph Keim Campbell and Michael O'Rourke and David Shier, eds., Seven Bridges Press, 2002), but a retrograde inversion thereof, i.e., a “truth theory of identity”, to wit: (*_TI) Identity is factually x iff a proposition x is truly x and only x, for every x. Identity-transparency violations of (*_TI) with respect to (x₁,x₂,x₃,…,x_n) are tacitly disallowed under the truth theory of identity, by means of which absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct individuality is explicitly claimed, maintained, and sustained, despite this claim being exclusively predicated upon the ₁T₂-only-logical-value-order-type alone of all such order-types there are _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ (the corpora of relative-states of identity-transparency therein implicit constituting as a totality the coherence interfaces of identity qua identity as metaphysical-whatnot unto existential-somewhat: see the very interesting reflections and lists of references contained in “Identity as a Coherence Interface”, Devin Bostick, 8 December 2025). The inversion of the retrograde, *_, is in making truth-valueness a Kantian category of our understanding, rather than a Kantian property of judgments, John McDowell's “true thinkables” being only of the lowest logical-value-order-type of the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ identity-transparency relative-states char[actor}is|tic (think: topo-active optime executions -- <<< tic-tic-tic… >>> -- of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers: not the works of mere ₁T₂-only-inference-operator “pruners”: rather, symmetry-wise removing “buckets of dust” from MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space) of n-body-quantum composite pro[super}po[sit}i|ons in nesting-foams. Three-fold topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time as execUtor of Kantian transcendental schema has N.H.Abel's transalgebraic E.T.Bellian cyclotomic [de}composition-[re}composition involute memetime-independently state-functor-functional-function form-in-process-[de}solutioning-[re}solutioning LSTDs, limited spacetime domains, with respect to the Wheelerian-Aurobindoian-Kusaman dusti on most-densely-packed CommonGround T_zog-chen-AllBase sheet of MVRS BackCloth to the geometrodynamics of spacetime physics. For an elaborate exposition of the ₁T₂-only, passing, passive, referential, memetime-bound POV, see Time and Modes of Being, Roman Ingarden, Charles C. Thomas, 1964: particularly edifying are the discussions of modes of being and moments, and the modes of being of events, processes, and objects enduring in time. The OBEed Schrödinger-catting-about circum[in]spection _µT_mly-implicate to Husserliana of Analytical Cubism aside, in the terms of circuiting m-valued cats, we have the space-saving (“…k-Look-Up-Tables network binarization on Field Programmable Gate Arrays greatly increases area efficiency”) “piecewise PolyLUT learning” of “ELMap, an area-driven LUT mapping framework [which] incorporates structural choice during the collapsing phase [enabling] dynamic decomposition, maximizing local-to-global optimization transfer”. Heh-heh-heh!: here, by cognitive inversion, binarization-driven, E.T.Bellian [re}composition [re}solutioning is called “collapsing phase”. As, putting it right, regards E.T.Bellian [de}volutory form-in-process-[un}merging-to-event-gradients apiecemont of Noetherian conservation-law higher-order symmetries in frequency-domain-windowed tessellations and nesting-foams (not merely “the realization of both unrolled and tiled LUTNet architectures”), we have so-called-quantum algorithmic “Hierarchical Reversible Logic Synthesis Using LUTs”, Mathias Soeken, et al., Proceedings of The 54th Annual Design Automation Conference (DAC'17), held from 18-22 June, 2017, in Austin, Texas, USA. Per[son}ally, I certainly must see it; I/i^m-wise, however, we-me see that no 2-state-Schrödinger con[cat}in|at/i|on of elements of Clifford sets handled as absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct gates can authentically quantum-composite relative-states of ID-transparency -- so, IMHO, they are still building faster Boolean digitals.

I have some reservations about Devin Bostick's generalizations presented in his paper entitled “Identity as a Coherence Interface”, but before going into those I'd like to supportively suggest some specificities for the general notions he elaborates. The quantum-composite of Bostick's “orchestra of oscillations” has no bio-Musculpt rhythmic-cum-timing-fields-couplings wand-waving orchestral conductor, but it does have a “coherence interface” as genomic-identity implementor: i.e., the pi-electron-parcel quantum-harmonic temperature oscillator of DNA superconductant free-electron-gas core-environment, the ensemble of which parcels emits coherent nucleotide-pair-coupled quadripolar-wave clockings and immunological-identity signifiers at radiation-exchange-occasioned helix-coil transitions -- or so suggests our topologically-active-operator-time-formulated model of how DNA generates coherent-waves-as-identity-signature, a signature carrying, across organismic organizational scale levels, all the cascaded information ₁T₂ly-encoded into the nucleotide-pair sequences, as well as the reverse-cascading n-level-_µT_mly-enciphered higher-temporal meta-rule-enacting formants thereof. Another, more specific, way to look at what Bostick calls “phase drift” and “drift dampening”, as well as what he identifies as “coherence preservation” and “temporal smoothing” is codified in an illustration entitled “A Schematic Diagram of the DNA Mediated Autogenic Feedback Loop and the Degenerative Cycle of Disease Onset”, a diagram created for the “Illustrated Terminology Glossary” requested by Autogenic Training's Wolfgang Luthe in aftermath of my presentation -- to the 6th Congress of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine, Montreal, Canada, August 1981 -- of our paper entitled “Autogenic Discharge: Quantum Biological Considerations”, a capsulation of our earlier paper entitled “Some Preliminary Considerations toward Development of a Mathematical Model of the Autogenic Brain Discharge as Spontaneous Localization in Quantum Measurement”. As regards my reservations, well-- Bostick provides much greater insight than heretofore as to nature of the memetime-bound, IBE-encapsulated, ₁T₂-only normopath functioning in ponderablespace. This, IMHO, is accurate insofar as it goes -- just as, say, Skinnerian psychology is an accurate depiction insofar as it goes, i.e., at describing that functional aspect of the organism which Gurdjieff used the term “moving parts of centers” to designate. Bostick's distinction between “surfaces” and “substrates” (I adopted-adapted the terms “surface structure” and “deep structure” to indicate a similar distinction) is, I feel, too ₁T₂-only drawn: the substrates are not, as he pretty definitively argues, absolutely inaccessible to interoception -- nonzero hedged a qubit with his discussion of “individuals with higher phase sensitivity”. There clearly are levels -- all the way up to the virtuosity of the life-long-practiced -- of competency at what Edmund Jacobson called “autosensory observation” in an extraordinary paper, noted on pp. 270-71, Vol. 1, of our 1994 novel The Moon of Hoa Binh, the reading of that paper being the kickoff for initialization of the protagonist's personal journal of cataloged self-observations, traffic analysis thereof, reflections upon implications of that analysis. Quoting the novel:

A Notebook: Characterizations of Semiautonomous Part-Personalities. Instead of collecting EPIPHANIES like James J. or moral reflections in some Waldon, I propose to collect psychological fragments: more reveries of the solitary walker conducted, this time, on a methodological basis of systematic introspection. This study is to be derived from autosensory observation and is being initiated on 13 April 1964. By this method I hope to teach myself the accuracy in self-observation achieved in Edmund Jacobson's laboratory (or at least as it is described in his paper “On Meaning and Understanding”, Am J Psychol, XXII, pp. 553-577, 1911).

Subsequent paragraphs discuss specifications to be assumed relative to “general considerations”, “physiological indicators”, “behavioral signals”, “mental manifestations”, and “catalog of personalities” identified. Of greatest relevance here, in Bostick's terms, is the physiological-indicators paragraph, to wit, quoting (with, hopefully, reader awareness that this is a prescriptive specification at the beginning of the undertaking, an undertaking undertaken under dissociative Bostick-“phase-drift” distress long sustained by a fellow one year out of high school, a fellow who had undergone more than the usual-considerable in the myriad ways of cross-cultural and return-home-culture-shock assaults upon integrity of the learned behavior called “myself”, an undertaking resolutely reserved to self-reliance -- heh-heh-heh! -- because trust in authorities, any suchlike, had been terminally undermined at a too-early age):

Physiological indicators: a change of temperature of the forehead (i.e., hotheadedness), in the pulse rate, in the respiratory rate, in the regularity of the rhythm of respiration; a change in the amount of muscular tension in the extraocular muscles, the forehead, the jaw muscles (grinding of teeth), the abdomen, the neck muscles; the appearance of substernal pain; a change in the amount of tremor; an alteration in the intensity of the startle reflex.

So-- moreover: the efficaciousness of long-term intensive practice most certainly can be amplified by use of biofeedback, flotation-isolation tanks, sweat lodges, meditation-associated endogenous-ketamine floods, so on and so forth. The contention is well known, and more or less well documented, that yogic practices can yield degrees of voluntary control over autonomic functions -- however much this has been ignored by molecular biologists-neurologists. Submolecular quantum biochemistry is the sub-substrate which provides the memetime-bound oscillatory substrate; the m-valued logics of the m-valued Schrödinger wavefunction, those logics understood relative to relative-states of identity-transparency, not truth-values, provides the memetime-independent sub-sub-substrate; speaking here ₁T₂ly, topo-active optime, as execUtor of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, provides universal consciousness in its active aspect, whilst the superposed-“buckets of dust”-dusted MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, provides universal consciousness in its passive aspect as the space acted upon.

Concurrence with Devin Bostick's intent in creating the idea of RIC ((see his paper entitled “The Resonance Intelligence Core (RIC): A Deterministic Paradigm Explainer”, codesintelligence.com, 12 August 2025)) is, IMHO, warranted, but my I/i^m cannot agree with the ₁T₂-only-logical formulation and the notion of structured [e}mergence, i.e., “the lawful return of coherent form across time” as a fundamental descriptor of the general case or of any given specific case -- that is: ₁T₂-only-definable memetime-boundedness. Rather, my I/i^m embrace: 3-fold topologically-active operator-time-executed (i.e., by instrumenting Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers) me[me}time-independent [de}mergence _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ and [re}mergent return, the C+-collection of returns being T_[ant}RIC-Schrödinger-superposed such that the involutory [de}composition-[re}composition of T_zog-chen AllBaseCommonGround is hyperself-referentially-qua-hyperself-reentrantly simpleself-cancelling (cf. Bernadette Roberts' no-self state as supremo [gifted to my Iambe good offices of David Spillane]; and the Kyoto school relative to total kenosis and shunyata; minimally, to the inner-stop ekstasis of Christ's “Get behind thyself!”), i.e., is selfless C+-“times” over (each class-of-classes of m-valued logic -- _C+T_C+, _CT_C+, _µT_m -- has, according to our schema, an associated logic-defined-type of topo-active optime, ₁T₂-memetime being Buddhologically instrumental of artificial Maya [Bostick's AIed “hallucinations”]: well, no, I didn't, wasn't able to see the advantage, given my cognitive foci: bogged down, I was, wasn't I, lost interest, during the several occasions in which I tried to work my way through ₁T₂-only-Applied Algebra and Functional Analysis, Anthony N. Michel and Charles J. Herget, Dover, 1981). The notion of absolute universal lawfulness is, IMHO, an artifact of the employment of the ₁T₂-only-logical-value-order-type alone (not least because the notion of logical fallacy is deferred [a fallacy in one logical-value order-type is not a fallacy in some other such order-type] up, up, and away into regress upon regress all the way onto _C+T_C+ AllBase); or the employment of the ₁T₂-only-logical-value-order-type alone is an artifact of the insistence that there be in nature's way an absolute universal lawfulness upon which to model the institutional base (an insistence derivative of the compensatory abreactions generated by the existential anxiety-unto-hysteria occasioning existential threats -- like very existence of m-valued logics; like inherent unbombability; like the non-simple-identity knee-jerk eliciting “find 'em, fix 'em, and finish 'em”: nowadays yielding, by ConveDD, i.e., conversion-disorder displacement, the specter of I-slamming self, uh, uh, that's auto, grins, uh, uh, grilles, analogically modeled on the toothy smile of a great white shark -- to the existential-guilting claim to possession of an absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct selfhood, that claim in face of nature's identity-transparent omnium gatherum relative-states, i.e., relative to Bostick, indicative of the strongest PAS, phase alignment score). I view, as well, the notion of “pre trib rap” as being a pellucid example of a ConveDD, in this case, of “pre fib rat” (pre-fibrillation rationalization): the action-policy-[warfare}initialization-[targeting}decision-improvization, whatever, is “rationalized” in the psychopathology sense, not actually made on a “rational” basis in the binary-logic sense of the word. Though I resoundingly agree with specifics of Bostick's castigation of stochasticity and probabilistic models, and their AI imports, I/i^m cannot -- given that even my most-circumscribed Iambe embraces me[me}time-independent [de}mergence-[re}mergence, rather than [e}mergence -- concur with his idea that, quoting, “Intelligence, emergence, and symbolic stability require structure -- an ordering function external to the system's own representational space”: N.H.Abelian-E.T.Bellian-cyclotomic [de}composition-[re}composition of T_zog-chen AllBaseCommonGround most-densely-packed sheet of _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, BackCloth is, IMHO, necessary and sufficient to autopoiesis and automorphic organization of internal-system relative-states of identity-transparency, thus requiring no extra-systemic ordering function ((higher and higher levels of optimality, that is of self-organizational competency, say of markets, requires internalization, with, say _µT_m-processed m-valued-LETS nesting-foams, of more and more externalities: giving us, e.g., the Noetherian notion that “The invariants of the frequency space itself define the regime by which specific stereochemical processes are integrated spatially and temporally!” in speaking of “ozone a Fourier-transform operator”)), the MVRS being hyperedRiemann-surface-like, i.e., nature's m-logical omnium-gatherum way of handling nesting-foams of m-valued functors-functionals-functions. I would suggest that Bostick's intuition is right on, and that his AURA_OUT is a ₁T₂-simulation of _µT_m-functionality; and, moreover, that his SPIRALCORE makes an educated stab at accomplishing what 3-fold topologically-active operator-time accomplishes in executing Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbers of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-logical propositions. Think: temporal CURL relative to Bostick's “Chirality breaks symmetry into lawful directional forks” (but understood as taking Noether “full-circle”, not merely orthogonality-unwise, in terms of the J.G.Bennettian _µT_m-“skew perpendicularity” of lines of force and equipotential surfaces substrate of Heisenberg ₁T₂-only-uncertainty relations and Riemann's idea of e-charge as “lines-of-force trapped in the topology of space”, such that invoked are nested sets of Bostick “chirality breaks symmetry” conservation laws). Think: Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbers relative to Bostick's “Prime numbers encode irreducible phase intervals”. Think: the LSTDs, limited spacetime domains, of Earth-atmosphere's unrecognized (((not to mention castigated and excommunicated, circa 1974, due to demonstration thereof, à la: “Paine, D. A., and M. L. Kaplan, 1974: The linking of multi-scaled energy sources leading to atmospheric development, the hydrodynamic spectrum, Part I: A study in nonlinear wave interaction and Part II: A severe tornado-producing convective squall-line system. Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY and Air Force global Weather Central, Offutt AFB, Omaha, NE, Scientific Reports 1 & 2 for National Science Foundation Grant GA-35250, 140 pp.”, as stated in the list provided in the “Edited Contract Reports” section of Kaplan's CV))) topo-active-optime-instituted acoustic analogues to blackhole computing relative to Bostick's “Black holes set temporal boundary conditions”, that's temporal, mind you.

Well, in response, I guess I must make an observation: Paul Craig Roberts' long-ongoing critique of Putin timidity (for some recent related posts, see here and here and here and here) neglects understanding of Stalin's foam-rubber-pillow grand strategy at playing the game of chess. As the protagonist argued in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, to the Col. Toussaint character ((Romanian mother, heroic French-army-officer father who was killed in the Great Kabylia during the war in Algeria; free French sidekick of OSS-character Colin Dawes, a stand-in for Aaron Banks -- ABCD, eh what! -- PACKARDed into France and later RAVENed into Laos from Kunming: some modifications of a story communicated during a face-to-face with Archimedes L.A. Patti who was face-to-face briefed-qua-instructed by FDR before his OSS posting to Kunming: little known is the fact that Ho Chi Minh face-to-face offered Gordon Walker, The Christian Science Monitor's lead reporter in the Great Pacific War and aftermath, the position of Press Secretary to the newly forming Hanoi government, as related to me by Walker's wife when she lent me his unpublished personal journal from the war years; some interesting contextualization provided here, and let it be known that Nha Trang and I during our afternoon with Tran Van Giau and his wife, good offices of my visa sponsor, Tran Bac Dang, asked no questions about Saigon Aug-Sept events of 1945)) at Strategic Research and Analysis inside MACV-HQ and jeeping around the SMA, Saigon metro area, Stalin, a wily Kartvelian back-street-boy theology-student wiseacre rumble-tumbler from Gori -- this is not Brooklyn or Queens! -- knew all along that there would be war between Germany and the USSR, used his back-street wiles to postpone the event as long as possible, including the Pact with Hitler, most significantly until 22 June 1941 (Napoleon Bonaparte began his invasion on 24 June 1812), when Hitler, given the requisite historical awareness, should have initialized in early-March. Establishing as grand strategy a foam-rubber pillow (made thicker and softer by the windfalls that came from the Pact), like was done to Napoleon, Stalin had no need or interest in the exact date of a coming invasion, only to postpone it as long as possible. In 1964 I did not know of the following statement from Stalin when researching the Nazi-Soviet Pact for Abdul Aziz Said's AU-SIS class “Foreign Policies of the Great Powers”, or during the late-1980s period in the writing of “Moon”, but Stalin once said: “I did not need any warnings. I knew war would come, but I thought I might gain another six months or so.” This quote from Roger Moorhouse, in his 2014 The Devils' Alliance, p. 255, quoting John Erickson's 1962 The Soviet High Command: A Military-Political History, 1918-1941 quoting of Stalin. My Iambe absolutely is not a “comsymp” for Marx's parodies of Newtonian physics (e.g., the Bewegungsgesetze “law of motion” of society and the energy accumulation integral-sum factorial in the labor theory of value) or for Lenin's surface-structure frontings of double-stacked-substrate political [infra}structures; moreover, given my dad-blasted mass-psychosis-theory extensions of the mainstream-psychiatric notion of individual conversion-disorder displacement, ConveDD, I could not in any way possibly justify the STALINiferous purgings -- howsoever much the Tzarist-reality-induced collective PTSD de[man}did “prohomeostatic” (Luthe) high colonics and projective (I typed “projectile”, only to come back and find…: AIed-spelling-checker code-righters, heh-heh-heh, need to improve the knowledge base informing their surrogates' vocabularies!) vomiting (itself a ConveDD!) -- of the 1930's and early-1940's; nevertheless, I cannot -- based on the horrid principles in grand strategy of the strategic defensive alone -- fully embrace the quintessentially BRITism which is the last chapter of Moorhouse's very informative and exceedingly excellent book, not least as regards its tells concerning the haps of taaaday which controvert much of M's last chapter. So, given that rude assessment, and that surly attitude, I resonate with the James Lee Burke character, Dave Robicheaux, when said of him is (the novel Clete, Atlantic Monthly Press, the 2024 hardback edition, p. 261):

…Dave is one of the few people who, like me, believe there is more craziness in the world than rationality. Dave is kind to normal people, but he thinks they're squares and tries to get away from them as soon as possible.

This being the least that should be said given the omnipresence and cognitive near-omnipotence of collective ConveDDs: nowadays, e.g., breakdancing as abreactive “mass-formation” ConveDD compensating suppression of the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logochronotopologies associated with topologically-active-operator-time-executed demergence qua D.L.Rapoport-ontopoiesis supraduality-unto-superduality understood as memetime-independent _C+T_C+-unto-₁T₂-cyclotomic logophysics de[re}compositional non-selfsamely{self}referential-[self}reentrant-[self}canceling involute of MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space; and this dance-craze ConveDD carried into development of AI as breakdancing robots, a cartoonish psychopathological carryover supplanting an AI development path involving holographic exteriorization of inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation capable, along with deployment of m-valued-LETS nesting-foams, of facilitating the learning of _µT_m-logical modes of ratiocination.

Super[sum}ing costs-of-production, exchange, utility, monetary, power, subjective, marginal, use, labor value theories, there is the ALLOTROPIC ([all}L, for Lukasiewiczian-logical values: allele, of “eachother”, heh-heh-heh; al[lot}ropy: in a given phase, formal variations) theory of value, as elaborated in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh: the [eco}nomic value of a (functional-specificity signifying) specific item-product-[financial}instrument varies directly as to the state of functional integration of the system-composite it fosters over the time-shapes of total capital stock, planet Earth, mapped upon MVRS, the m-logically-valued reference space. In this context, consider that Bostick (Section 2.1 of RIC) “CODES inverts this [i.e., Shannon entropy, whereupon “Shannon entropy is a measure of symbolic variation” wherewith “Shannon's information theory defines information as surprise”]: coherence replaces surprise as the unit of intelligence”. Coherence, uh, phase coherence, being allotropically of each other -- how a given phase is defined being a function-functional-functor of the partitioning algorithm employed to identify the time-shapes of the nesting-foam man[i}fessed me[me}time-independently by 3-fold Pauli-Paine topo-active-optime execution of the Godel-numbered Godel numbers numbering dust motes on MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, the given techno-regime being derivative thereof. Last-is-first non-orientability signifying the self-canceling involved in making Maya out of memetime -- or as James Lee Burke's Clete interior monologue reflections upon the character of character Dave Robicheaux has it, p. 312:

…he made his peace with the nature of reality, or at least his reality. He said he thinks everything in existence happens simultaneously, there is no past, present, or future; it's as though you're in a dream inside the mind of God.

Ack, aye, intelligent value (m-ensheavement stacked on currency unit base state qua cash, transactions therewith _µT_mly processed via L-analog processors). However, un|par[allele}D absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinctness has been the consensuated choice. Baulk at? Nuts. By guile! will we take as our preference the reckoning-of-this-and-that reduced to the reconning of a reckoning avengement. Dum-de-dum-dum: cL[i]m[act}'er[i]c cuspover, whaat. The dull, the drilled, the docile of Churchillian castigation exist no more? Had our forebears had, uh, taken, the memetime to dime, uh, uh, diminish, the… uh, brainy boom boxes pre-fib-ratting-out qua fronting intransigent stubBORNness of the probability amplitude that stochasticity would undermine the planometric preference functions implicit in MMT, maybe, just maybe-- hmmm.

There are many interesting aspects of Devin Bostick's attempt to redirect the widely-held bases upon which AI is being brought up here, there, and everywhere; an attempt that, by my lights, may show how AI-learning regimens could be employed to facilitate the bringing-down, via [de}mergence, of high-school-PSSC-physics-take-on-multivalued-Schrödinger-cum-honors-econ-take-on-multiple-bank-credit-expansion-inspired and subsequently quantum-wave-properties-of-DNA-analogically-modeled _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams as resolvers of the leverage-extreme-interlinked[counterparty}obligations-shadow-banked-nth-degree-rehypothecated-[collateral}pooled-stripped-delocalized[unto}CDOed-n,…,zTranched-yet-still-held-to-be-[I-am-me-and-only-me]-holy ₁T₂-only-wholly-ownable-financial-derivatives-quadrillion-plus-overhang e[con}omics, WarBuff-weapons-of-mass-destruction, systemic-qua-existential threat, and as replacements for the ₁T₂-only-disaster-capitalist-cum-surveillance-society Replacement Killers: CBDCs and SCSSs (targeting individuals, TPTB's raison d'etre, rather than 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-order integrals of coherent-Fröhlich-cooperative-collective behaviors, the actual governing Bohm-quantum-potential functions-functionals-functors of the market Bostick-substrate responsible, howsoever interdicted, for the, surface-structure unrealized, higher levels of self-organizational competency -- no mere Smithian-invisible magic ₁T₂-only-whatever: hand, fingers, uh, toes). He, Bostick, for instance, identifies identity thusly (in Section 2.5 of RIC) in explication as to why prediction does not equal intelligence, to wit, quoting:

I(t) = identity of system at time t
I(t) = {S_0, S_1,…, S_n} such that PAS_s(S_i) is greaterthanorequalto Theta for all i

PAS equals “phase alignment score”. So, system identity at time t encompasses all phase scores from 0-to-n. Here we have a stab at system identity, I/iⁿ. I and not-I being-there memetime-simultaneously to exponential n, the multiple not-I(s) ₁T₂-only construed. My POV is “physiologically-adapted” (Luthe) qua “phase-relative” (Pensinger) I/i^m because I do not believe that I/iⁿ, involving, as it does, ID-transparency, can authentically-adequately be topologically-“handled” qua numerically-processed absent utilization of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logics. Bostick's algorithmic-externality embodiment of lawfulness is, IMHO, a stand-in for the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ logics that should have been, and still need to be, employed to interpret the multivaluedNESS of Schrödinger's m-valued linear wavefunction, which, moreover, needs for completion two additional orders, these being of nonlinearity. He, Bostick, also tells us of one condition-of-the-condition-of-the-conditional as to why there has-been-and-will be little-to-no interest in this, i.e., my take on Schrödinger, by, furthermore, identifying (in Section 2.4 of RIC) an aspect of THE reason why the m-valued Schrödinger statefunction was dissembled by the BornRule probability amplitude ((IMHO the straw that broke the camel's back in regards to, if my Iambe may take the presumption, Bostick-substrate-forced ontogeny, uh, uh, onto[patho}genesis, of the WWII-battle of the 200-Years War of the World)), rather than being correctly interpreted with m-valued logics understood relative to _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state identity-transparency, not truth-value. No-to-little interest despite the fact that the C-of-the-C-of-the-C may be species near-terminal. Okay, Section 2.4 of RIC, to wit, quoting:

Every stochastic system inherits a blind spot: it can't detect whether the system is lying, contradicting, or collapsing as long as local probability remains high. Let:

P(x | context) approximates to 1.0, but
PAS_s(Si) << Theta

Then output is technically correct, but structurally false.

Theta in the coilings-to-tornadogenesis tilt-context could well be T_e, Theta-e equivalent potential temperature, surfaces of which, however warped, are equipotential and have Music-Sculpture infrasound signatures, the stacked “overtone series” involved implicating _µT_m-processing of multivalued-Schrödinger wavefunction-functional-functor appropriately scaled to atmospheric ponderablespace grid lengths and memetime steps, the intersectional “lines-of-force” bases of which full-circle Noether symmetry-invariants-conservation-laws, nixing orthogonality-alone, and accommodating the J.G.Bennettian null-vector-defined skew-perpendicularity “substrate” to Heisenberg's non-bijective-by-inequality, but ₁T₂-only logical, uncertainty relations, among other such relations, under the assumptions of single-valued universal physical constants and absence altogether of Wheelerian pre-pregeometry dust motes in phase-boundary bucket-partition nesting-foams. Okay, but the “blind spot” is not only inherited, it is preferred -- absolutely so by politico-e{con}omic TPTB amongst us: “lying, contradicting, or collapsing”. Bostick illustrates his contention with a statement about sharks; I choose the TACO token: Truman Always Contains Offenders. Quoting Roger Moorhouse's The Devils' Alliance, p. 288, quoting Lynn Olson's Those Angry Days: Roosevelt, Lindbergh, and America's Fight over World War Two, 1939-1941, Random House, 2014:

Future president Harry Truman, for instance -- then a senator for Missouri -- voiced the somewhat Machiavellian suggestion that “If we see that Germany is winning we ought to help Russia, and if Russia is winning, we ought to help Germany, and that way let them kill as many as possible.”

So, 'e says, e-sensually: “Kiss my Heini!” Ass[u}aged the offenders, he did, didn't he. Nowadays -- arse[n}al of de-mock-racy once againe, whaat! -- it may be well to remember that the first U.S. island hop of the WWII-era came before American entry into the war, the 12 September 1941 U.S. Navy action in Greenland (out of which -- BW1, Bluie [ArmySpeak for Greenland] West One -- my father DUMBOed air-sea-rescue missions post-BerlinerLuftbrucke, on one occasion having to ditch an SB-17G on a Labrador beach: the closest I ever got to BW1 was Tarbotvale, Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia). Moreover, there are those who believe that “our India”, like that of Big-H, is not only the ME, but also, or primarily, the Russia resource base that is to be denied to Germany and China. This assertion intimates properties of a near universal of human behavior, which I've often mentioned: once a member of the leadership elite fully identifies hisher egofunction with the socially-conferred role attributions of hisher position, that [per}son-[per}daughter no longer wholly exists as a claimed absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct individual; with the exception of cognitions required for pedestrian ADLs, their thoughts are not their thoughts but contents of regressed archetypal event gradients downloaded from the collective unconscious, contents which they arrogate as being self-created: this is, of course, denied; otherwise, it would be tantamount to psychic invasion, possession by a demon, et cetera. If not this identified member of TPTB fulfilling demands of the gradient, then another will be found as a matter of unconscious collective action. This does not amount to wholesale deterministic absence of free will. Why? Because the regressed archetypal event gradients are constellated by integral summation of myriad individual conscious decisions to suppress this and that out of fear and loathing, say, this and that principle of a newly developed Weltanschauung. A sufficiently large collection of conscious decisions to not suppress would in due course remove the given regression constellating the given event gradient. Changing identified members of TPTB, diplomatic negotiations, new regulations, new alliances, new laws, new policies, another war: these transpire on a level that cannot yield substantial positive alterations of the given conundrum expressed by the given gradient. James Lee Burke's Clete stated it this way, p.278:

…the commonality is the kind that has no origin and leaps from group to group, like the great influenza epidemic in 1918, except that the infection is moral and not in the glands.

It's like trying to explain the rise of Hitler…

That's the insanity. We don't believe the things we actually do.

Be all that as it may ((and I certainly don't necessarily subscribe to those of Michael Hudson or any other set of ALT-unto-MSM-promulgated geo-politico-military notions, given that I, obviously, altogether spurn elementary-school notions as to dynamics of currently prevailing international-cum-transnational infrasystematics, this ATTITUDE on my part -- the ideas involved characterized as “bizarre”, or words amounting to similar judgments, being the most frequent reaction to their imports as regards the notion “agency” -- cultivated ever since their initialization in context of, by invitation delivered at the Westmoreland-Boulevard-apartment brainstorming get-togethers, (1) repeatedly sitting in on this and that session of Prof. Abdul Aziz Said's graduate “Theories” course concerning systematics of the international order, AU-SIS, circa Fall of 1965, in conjunction with (2) exposure to the social anthropology contents of the 9-hour graduate seminar entitled “African Systems of Kinship and Marriage” I'd talked my way into so as to “get some depth” in face-to-face discussions with Prof. Absolom Vilakazi)), Devin Bostick's paper of 11 May 2025, entitled “Structured Resonance Intelligence (SRI): The New Substrate of Computation, Cognition, and Causality”, states quite clearly the substrate ((_µT_m-LETS currency nesting-foams defined over quasi-fractal e-boundaries, and indicator-measurables ensheaved upon base-state of currency unit, being the surface-structures to the Bostick substrates)) to the definitive solution to, for one of many instances, the problem of foreign-origin and cryptocurrency donations to political parties (not to mention: money-center appropriation -- with, say, financial derivatives -- of local multiplier effects, across whatsoever scale-level partitions): to wit, quoting:

At the core of this implementation [[of “structured resonance intelligence” realized via “interaction of recursive waveform states”: see here, regarding recursion, for interesting GregoryBateson-related background and links]] is the Resonance Intelligence Core (RIC), a hardware substrate composed of resonance-reactive modules. These modules use signal legality operators such as PAS_n (Phase Alignment Score) and C_n (Coherence Score) to determine whether a given signal can be processed or emitted. Signal outputs are not generated unless phase-lock conditions are met locally and globally across the resonance lattice. The Spiral Phase Coherence Function (SPCF_n) defines localized waveform integrity as a function of time-damped amplitude, prime-indexed frequency, and chirality curvature.

What better program to initialize the first ₁T₂-only stage of the long process of bottom-up implementing _µT_m-logically-processed m-valued monetary-exchange units transacting through LETS e-nesting-foams qua “resonance lattice”?

It is, indeed, interesting how the right stuff in the way of scientific-mathematical ideas often comes out of unexpected places. As inner monologue of James Lee Burke's Clete has it (p. 264):

You learn from the crazoids. It's the same way with history, right? It's the little people who come out of nowhere and usually disappear again, after maybe inventing the wheel.

Devin Bostick is not a physicist or a biologist; he has an accounting and finance background, including from studies at LSE. And he appears to have virtually all at once posted a bunch of very interesting papers to the internet during the period mid-to-late-2025 into early-2026, ten years after completing his academic classwork. Of those papers I've read so far, “From Probability to Coherence: Why Schrödinger, Prigogine, Kauffman, and Born Stop Short”, 29 September 2025, is my favorite, not least because of the following two summary passages:

CODES (Chirality of Dynamic Emergent Systems) reframes their [the four-named in title to the paper] gaps as artifacts of incomplete phase detection. What appears “random” is unresolved coherence. The multiharmonic Phase Alignment Score (PAS_h) is introduced as the universal, scale-free invariant of coherence.

CODES (Chirality of Dynamic Emergent Systems) provides that closure [of what the four-named stopped short of completing, leaving theoretical “gaps”]. Its multiharmonic Phase Alignment Score (PAS_h) generalizes coherence beyond the scalar first-harmonic (r₁), capturing antiphase, quadrature, and multimodal alignments. Drift is measured via deltaPAS_zeta, the vector difference of successive coherence states. Together with the legality stack (CHORDLOCK, TEMPOLOCK, GLYPHLOCK, AURA_OUT), these conditions enforce determinism: no emission is permitted unless it is phase-aligned, drift-bounded, symbolically closed, and prime-timed.

He goes on to argue that “'probability' is simply incomplete phase detection” and that “bifurcations, randomness, or entropy are coherence transitions measurable by PAS_h”. Moreover, he says that his claims are testable, citing examples such as “Biological oscillators (e.g., mitochondrial or neuronal phase locking)”, “Dissipative structures (e.g., hurricanes, AMOC transitions)”, and “Protein folding basins”. Most significantly, he cites “Quantum events that look probabilistic when measured only at r₁ (the first harmonic) resolve deterministically when higher harmonics (r₂, r₄, …) are included”. I note the ideational resonance between (1) his notion of CODES and 3-fold temporal CURL of Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time; and (2) his notion of PAS_h and the 3-fold-topo-active-optime-formulated non-linear quantum harmonic oscillator canonical equation given here with respect to DNA's quantum-wave properties and here with respect to the cascade dynamics of tornadogenesis. However, while Bostick explains why -- why-number-one -- the four-named “each advancing beyond reductionism, yet each leaving probability untouched”, a leaving due to the fact that “Without a universal invariant [according to Bostick: PAS_h], their systems could describe emergence but not lawfully seal it”, he does not explain why -- why-number-two -- each of the four-named were unable to discover THE universal invariant. Perhaps this article, “Echo of the Mockingbird: Why Postwar Historiography Is Anti-Historiographic”, goes some distance towards answering why-number-two. As an aside, I include the following so that they are not lost. The original version of University of Tel Aviv and Harvard educated University of Buenos Aires physicist Diego Lucio Rapoport's Amazon review of our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh included reference to our paper linked immediately above, “Echo of the Mockingbird”, but Amazon edited that reference out. Diego Rapoport (link good offices of Lucinda Munro Cook) had the following to say:

This is no common text nor hypertext, but one of the most intrepid and consistent thought-soul-world exploration written in centuries. The wealth and depth of insight reflects embodied knowledge, far from the academic dance-parlance, currently staggering as a consequence of the inertia of centuries of dualism. It nurtures, provokes, urges, pledges, creates, challenges, intuites, lays out, smacks and hard, ultimately repulsing the reader that has been hiding under the cover of social commentary-adoctrination. To me, as a (re)searcher, it meant bringing me to live the surmountal of the Janus faces of dualism, to face the neo-Cartesian Cut, and I am nothing but thankful to the authors for their work. For sure, there are issues here that require the works and lifes of generations of wo-men. Be it, who can claim to be able to stop Time? It is Time and its logophysics, one of the central issues that the authors, unmatched in the literature on the issue, bring to the fore.

Michael (a fellow POLOBer at SRA/MACV-J2 physically located in MACV-HQ as part of the staffing to General Westmoreland) had this to say about our novel:

William “Larry” Pensinger and his wife, Nha Trang, have created an incredible word painting. Some parts of the painting may seem abstract. Other parts, such as the detailed descriptions of areas in and around Saigon, have photographic clarity. Don't let the price scare you away. You get two hefty bound volumes (over 1700 pages total) which include art by Nguyen Quynh. There's also a small map showing locations in the Saigon area which are mentioned in the book. There's much more to the book than Vietnam. If you are only interested in Vietnam, then read those parts before delving into the rest. Readers who worked at the Combined Intelligence Center Vietnam (CICV) or the Military Assistance Command Vietnam (MACV) will be especially interested in descriptions of activities at those locations. Readers familiar with the Westmoreland-CBS “Uncounted Enemy” trial will be interested in reading about the workings of the Political Order of Battle (POLOB) section of MACV J2 SRA, Strategic Research and Analysis. Anyone who worked for the 519th Military Intelligence Battalion near the Binh Loi Bridge will find descriptions of locations in that area. Take “The Moon of Hoa Binh” with you to an island and find something new in it every day.

Google's AI introduced our novel thusly:

The Moon of Hoa Binh: A Novel (1994) is a 1,700+ page, complex novel by Nha Trang Cong Huyen Ton Nu and William L. Pensinger, exploring 1968 Saigon's intelligence underworld and 1970s Japan. It blends a murder mystery, philosophical inquiry, and cultural history, written by a Vietnamese folklore scholar and a former Vietnam War intelligence analyst. Key Aspects of the Novel: Plot & Setting: The narrative operates on two main tracks: the high-stakes, paranoid atmosphere of Saigon during the 1968 Viet Cong insurgency, and a later, contrasting setting in Kyoto, Japan, nine years later. Authorship: Co-authored by Nha Trang Cong Huyen Ton Nu (a scholar of Vietnamese literature/folklore) and William L. Pensinger (a former Vietnam-era intelligence officer). Content & Style: Described as a “cumbersome, seemingly interminable koan” by reviewers, it incorporates deep dives into Vietnamese culture, poetry translations, Viet Cong political apparatus studies, and psychological, sociological reflections. Genre & Themes: It combines espionage, historical fiction, philosophical inquiry, and murder mystery. Physicality: Often noted for its extensive length, exceeding 1,700 pages, as seen on Abe Books and Amazon. The novel is known for being intellectually challenging, detailed, and offering a unique, non-conventional perspective on the Vietnam War, sometimes described as a “sociological and psychological study disguised as a spy thriller.”

Not a bad summary, eh, this from AI accessing secondary sources.

Interoceptive autosensory observation coupled to introspective autocognitive observation (by some classes of non-practitioners -- particularly those memetime-bound in their ideational proclivities -- deemed mere retroflexion): = such that, the my of my-body; the my of my-mind; the my of my-self; the self of myself; the self of that self; the self of the self of that self₁, … ,self_n (think a self-mapping composed with itself n times, with the property that as limit infinity is reached self_n = self₁: giving due consideration to Hubert Benoit and the wealth of literature on endogenous ketamine flood at zazen), when run in cascading retrograde self_n, … ,self₁, yielding -- the binary-mind at work here -- by successive ₁T₂-only-construed approximations unto Cantorian C-for-continuum, under the contraction mapping principle (see: Part 1, Section 3 of the linked paper) qua Banach Fixed-Point Theorem (think: the down-down-down whup-whup-whup, each whup indicative of a temporalCURLed logical-value-order-type “phase” transition at return to in-the-body identification), fixed point x, that x ever more encapsulated in separatism by cascade-decomposition from topological space T₀ (i.e., not-yet-indiscrete Kolmogorov space), that space containing T₁, T₂ (i.e., Hausdorff space), … ,T₄ (i.e., metric space), … ,T₆ (i.e., discrete perfectly normal Hausdorff space) and onto ₁T₂-only-generalized vector spaces like C-for-continuous-function[1,2] and onto the soft lattice spaces, T_i (see: “On some Separation Axioms in Soft Lattice Topological Spaces”, Sandhya S. Pai and Baiju T, Baghdad Science Journal, 21:12, 2024), of Molodtsov soft-set-theoretic treatment of the ₁T₂-only uncertainties entertained by the fixed-point egofunction, x. What distinguishes one T from another are, largely, separation axioms ((see, and note that the human spirit is indominable in face of war and societal destruction: “On Separation Axioms (T₀, T₁, T₂, . .[fractional]. . ,T₃, . .[fractional]. . ,T₄, and T₅) and Relationships Among Them”, Salma Saadoun Amir, graduation project for BS in math, Pure Science-University Of Anbar, Iraq, 2018)) between, in personified terms, the sets of 'I's composing I/iⁿ. These T's are not the transparency T's of _µT_m-valued logics understood relative to relative-state identity-transparency which would carry the topological-space T's into negative subscript-values: ₁T₂ly speaking, for consider (good offices of Michel and Herget's Applied Algebra and Functional Analysis) the self-adjointicity sacred to consensus quantum mechanics. Let A be an element of L(X,X), the set of all linear transformations from a vector space X into itself. Then A is said to be self-adjoint if A* = A (selfsameness), and it is said to be skew-adjoint if A* = -A (minimal non-selfsameness, leaving all other not-A's aside). Under the _µT_m logics of relative-state identity-transparency -- and thinking of a non-homogeneous nonlinear integral equation of the third kind, cf. our topo-active-optime (the operators of which are nilpotent insofar as ₁T₂-only-definable memetime is concerned) canonical equation -- _µT_mly-logical J.G.Bennettian [₁T₂ly-null}-vector-defined skew-perpendicularity would full-circle Noether invariants completely around the unit circle, generating fullness of non-selfsame adjointicity -- when personified, transforming sequential i₁, … ,i_n into a nesting-foam of I/iⁿ onto I/i^m: = such that self₁, … ,self_n unto Cantorian C-for-continuum would, speaking in memetime-bound terms, be necessary to eternity if not sufficient to the able-ness-to-be of hyparxis. The eternal as e[tern}al-flyaway or e[turn}al-circling? The God-property-by-superegoic-projective-identification eternal taken for to be, all-things-considered, me[me}time[backward}for[e}ver, … ,me[me}time[forward}for[e}ver, or as the bureaucratic me[me}time-independent khalafa-eternality of bi, … ,n-furcation? The e of eternal signifying the et of etcetera? The et[earn}al as the moral “and”: merit; or the et[urn}al as the spatial “and”: container? The e of eternal as the al-jabr number e in {e, pi, i}-specified principles of “right ordering”, i.e., “general process”? Over and over ₁T₂ly circling the simply-identifiable square, s (think? Kostick “deltaPAS_zeta, the vector difference of successive…”) -- prefiguring the likes of X, we've had repetitive repetitions of the [s-c}secreted hisstories of the early X'ian historian Proc[t]o[pi}us -- or _µT_mly-unto-_CT_C+ly enveloping the J.G.Bennettian skew-cube, s_cu (think? the [₁T₂-only-null}-vector-defined, “pencils-of-skew-parallels”-drawn, nested polytopes of tessellated, multi-sheeted Riemann-surface-like MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, Box-Manned as mankind[I/i^m}fessed)? Down, down, derry down: near-circles within near-circles, spiral-form? Art of the ordeal -- not to mention the [and}deal and the [not}deal, eh. Heh-heh-heh! Though Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky did not coin the terms biosphere (Edward Suess) and Okologie (Ernst Haeckel), he expertly brought the two together, as “late” -- heh-heh-heh -- as circa 1926, and in so doing Vernadsky-ideation coupled to Special Relativity near-incorporation to Russian dynamical meteorology seriously undermined veracity of Marx's parodies of Newtonian physics applied to sociology of political economy, such that, subsequently, true{man]'s TACO-Kennanism surely prolonged by decades the inevitable “phase transition” which became a [re}“turning”-to-oligarchs via Western-demockracy interventions. And nowadays the tendentious ₁T₂ly-normopathic partisanship of AIed stochastically-probabilistic artificial NNs impugns all argumentation that is _µT_mly-polemical. KET-BRAed, more vectors than maps on this level of ideation: [arg!}Umen[tat}i|on; [art}i|fic[t]al; ten/dent[iou}s; i[m}pugⁿ; part[is}an[n]; _µT_mly-pole[m}i[c}al[l]. Again, I resonate with the inner monologue of James Lee Burke's Clete, to wit, p. 276:

It makes me sad. It makes me feel that I am watching the end of something, maybe even time itself. I wake up in the morning and feel a sickness in the pit of my stomach I cannot understand. It seems to have no source. I feel like I'm walking around with buckets on my feet and a wool blanket wrapped tightly around my head. No one who has not experienced it can understand or talk about it. You feel yourself inside a painting that is melting and running down the canvas.

Almost half a century before Penn-State masters candidate Douglas A. Paine began seriously to apply Special Relativity within dynamical meteorology, Russian physicists, circa very early 1920s, were skirting the edge of doing so: e.g., Alexandrovich Friedman in hydrodynamics, study of atmospheric vortices, and “foundations of the statistical theory of turbulence structure”. I don't know how much of Andrei Nikolaevich Kolmogorov's work of the early-1940s Paine was aware of (while Paine frequently quoted Richardson, I never heard him mention Kolmogorov) in developing his hypercomplex-complex-angular-momentum-cascade qua topologically-active operator-time orientation to tornadogenesis, but, in putting strong emphasis upon accelerations and time rates of change of acceleration, he moved away from Kolmogorov, to wit, quoting the Friedman-above-linked “Russian School” article written by Gregory Falkovich:

The first Kolmogorov paper was submitted on 28 December 1940 (Kolmogorov, 1941a). Kolmogorov considers velocities at two points, following Friedman and Keller, whose work he knew and valued (Yaglom, 1994), yet he was apparently the first to focus on the velocity differences v₁₂ = v₁ - v₂. Kolmogorov describes a multi-step energy cascade (without citing Richardson) as a “chaotic mechanism of momentum transfer” to pulsations of smaller scales. He then argues that the statistics of velocity differences for small distances (and small time differences) is determined by small-scale pulsations which must be homogeneous and isotropic (far from boundaries). That is, Kolmogorov introduces local homogeneity and turns Taylor's global isotropy (see Sreenivasan's chapter on Taylor) into local isotropy. Kolmogorov never invokes an accelerating nature of the cascade.

Kolmogorov was most certainly not thinking of a non-homogeneous nonlinear integral equation of the third kind, cf. our topo-active-optime-conceived canonical equation 17, seen here. As regards Kolmogorov's “small time differences”, I quote our 1980 paper entitled “Some Preliminary Considerations toward Development of a Mathematical Model of the Autogenic Brain Discharge as Spontaneous Localization in Quantum Measurement”, the “DNA-Mediated Quantal Localization and Fusion in Cortical Function and Hyden's Molecular Theory of Memory” section (think, in this context respecting Hyden: the prescriptive enculturation-socialization orchestration of the glutamatergic anchoring by which memetime-boundedness is, à la Julian Barbour's The End of Time, made “autopoietically” memory-dependent), to wit:

On the basis of this model of superconductant DNA [pi-electron-parcel gas], it is hypothesized that the macroquantum localization process is recorded as phasic cortical activation by a free-energy cascade through the nested hierarchy of organizational levels in the cortex. The interference patterns in the quantum frequency domain decompose into a single-valued representation through resonance exchange initiated on the quantum level and proceeding through the molecular and cellular levels. As interference patterns in the frequency domain change and impinge upon the pi-electron parcels associated with the structure of DNA molecules (within the soma of the neurons comprising the cortical modules), these parcels undergo a sequence of critical-state radiation exchanges [cf. Kolmogorov's “small-scale pulsations”]. Variations in the referencing frequency domain serve to amplify or damp the fundamental frequency of a given parcel of pi-electrons. Specific temporal patternings of these radiation exchanges (distinguished by very small time differences [e.g., between Kolmogorov velocities, and also between accelerations, and, moreover, also between time rates of change of accelerations]) trigger frequency responses in the ensemble of pi-electron parcels associated with a given DNA molecule. These frequency modulations are instrumental in governing the helix-coil transitions of the molecule, where the inverse of a specific frequency determines the minimum time for spontaneous localization. As frequency variations occur, there are correlated variations in the respective minimum times, which, in turn, determine the time rate of change of bonding. [link and bold emphasis added, as well as those passages in brackets]

Indeed, one of the more significant aspects of the topologically-active-operator-time treatment of cascade dynamics is the principle that, quoting our 1978 paper on the atmospheric superconductant model: “The fundamental frequency of the oscillating parcel is found to function as an ordering principle by establishing the limits of the spatial domain [cf. Kolmogorov's “small distances”]… It appears that new concepts of space will arise as we begin explorations into the ordering functions of time.”

₁T_{2 µ}T_m I/i^m “double-digit midget” I/iⁿ _CT_C+ T_{zog-chen 1} 2^nk

---

Contact the page editor

Return to:

•Top

•Homepage