_µT_m Scenarios, T₅₀(M)

Metasemantically speaking, by analogically-[de}generative abduction independent of the hermeneutics of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction, the _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m cascade-demergence of _C+T_C+ T_zog-chen AllBaseCommonGround unto ₁T₂-only-Maya -- be the bivalence-intentionality TaiChi rotational or Aristotelean-Baconian-Boolean-Turingian inferential entailment of enumerated models -- is about aboutness encompassed by suchness understood as _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-relative-states of identity-transparency codified as iconic n-paramorphs, e.g., the n-adically non-selfsame J.G.Bennettian “skew-cube”, in inner-Musculpt symformphonie: higher-non-selfsame-selves logically-self-referential-qua-self-reentered-and-hence-not-₁T₂ly-orientable pointings qua “leadings away” to levels of sub[sent}ent[I/iⁿ]alls. In this context (T by way of standing-in for, uh, Tao? heh-heh-heh!), it is instructive to look at three different translations of Chapter 25 of Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching: see the I-Kuan Tao HQ version here and The Way of Emptiness version here and in Edward A. Gargan's The [Mekong] River's Tale, Vintage paperback edition, 2003, p. 79. My I/i^m find(s) Gargan's quoted selection to be most apt to the “decedes”-case as per the “analogical [de}generation” above referred to:

There is an essence that precedes heaven and earth,
It is formless, empty and blank,
It is the master of myriad things,
And it does not bend with the seasons.

Next in such aptness is I-Kuan:

Something is formed in the chaos, which existed before heaven and earth.
It is quiet and profound.
It stands alone and alters not.
It revolves eternally without exhaustion.

Then the Emptiness version:

There is something formed out of chaos,
That was born before Heaven and Earth.
Quiet and still! Pure and deep!
It stands on its own and doesn't change.

In my freshman “dissertation”-for-the-Dean, entitled “The Predicament of Existentialism”, preceptored by Prof. Abdul Aziz Said, AU-SIS, circa 1963, citing Gödel reflexivity circling and Schrödinger m-valuedness and F. S. C. Northrop's “indeterminate aesthetic continuum”, I logically, ontologically, and temporally challenged the notion “precedes” -- “leading-away” qua whilst “pointing”-out, à la Sartre, that the main distinction between Existentialism and Platonism is: Existentialism postulates “existence precedes essence”; Platonism postulates “essence precedes existence”. Gargan's above-quoted translation, with the words “essence” and “precedes”, most expertly places Taoism in the Platonist camp; the other two quotes similarly, but with less technical facility, using the word “before”. However, Sabindra Raj Bhandari in his “The Journey from Essence to Existence in Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching”, Literary Studies (of the Literary Association of Nepal), 35, March 2022, pp. 99-108, places Taoism, à la Sartre, in the Existentialist camp. What is going on here, uh, as regards the involved ₁T₂-contradiction -- a qubit of jabberwalking out a bit of me[tase}mantic poetry? In my view, I-Kuan trumps the Emptiness version as regards the pivotal “greatness” claim vis-à-vis such a wonking out of the jabber (I-Kuan first, then the Emptiness version):

The Great is far-reaching.
Far-reaching is infinite.
Infinite is to return to the self-sufficient origin.

“Great” means “to depart”;
“To depart” means “to be far away”;
And “to be far away” means “to return”.

STOP with the partitioning into parts, whydon'tya? To [de}part is the way to reenter The Way. That stoppage is Great! The cyclotomic reverse-cascade remergence-recomposition. A [re}versification requiring a retrograde inversion, a turn again, a [re}turn. “Infinite is to return”: how very right on! As I said upon dropping Calculus I: In the limit is not some selfsame value; rather, some sort of logical turnover (which I later came to understand as a logical-value-order-type transit up laddered _µT_m). And, again, I stand with the I-Kuan translation: “Therefore, Tao is great, heaven is great, earth is great, and so is the true-self.” Not with the Buddhist Emptiness version syncretizing Confucianism: “And the king is also great.” Is the true-self a king? Nor do I stand with the James Legge version and its versification unto authority vis-à-vis a rigid hierarchy unmitigated by J.G.Bennettian null-factor-skew, n-dimensional-Cantor-dusted _CT_C+-hologrammic part-is-whole/whole-is-part topologically-nonorientable relative-state identity-transparency. There is no precedes, no before, logically, ontologically, temporally -- _C+T_C+ly speaking, that is. On AllBaseCommonGround, “nothing ever changes” (Parmenides) is, indubitably is, “everything is nothing but changes” (Heraclitus). All that is ₁T₂ly taken to be every-thing there is and could be -- that is, those suchness-aboutness-whatnots and derivative geometrodynamical-somewhats and derivative ponderablespacememetime-whats _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂ly demergent from _C+T_C+ -- is, demergence being decomposition, already all ready always all ways on AllBaseCommonGround most-dense sheet with closest packing of quasi-Borel-set dust motes. JoeGoode-type-“Looking through” (search the term in the linked 19 July 2020 ARTWORKS article) the complex-hypercomplex-angular-momentum in cascade-waterfall (think: cf. Paine-Kaplan cascade numerical-forecast model of tornadogenesis), the wave-effected meshwork-logic latticed upon transparent sheet ensheaved upon transparent sheet, ₁T₂-unto-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+, looking through it all and “seeing” the superposed composite as it is in its _C+T_C+-is-ness: already all ready always all ways on AllBaseCommonGround, is-ness (_C+T_C+) encompassing suchness (_CT_C+) which encompasses aboutness (_µT_m) which encompasses the whatness (₁T₂) of this and that. This “seeing” is largely to be ontically facilitated by the numbered numberings stacked on a point and line to plane, in their stacked myriads: think, for instance, of the cosmological trope -- conceptually much more sophisticated than are Pop Art tropes -- resident in the hand-loomed ubiquitous South- and Southeast-Asian nested-and-interlaced triangular motif, notably in the m^ban sash (mentioned by Gargan, The River's Tale, p. 100) worn by women of the wild Wa. As regards the m(logical?)-valuedness conceivably construable to mban, be aware that in Mon-Khmer mban means: “actions [of topo-active optime?] not acceptable, can incur wrath of god” (search the word in the linked document). This mban riff being semi-tongue-in-cheek, but not altogether so. The ontological hierarchy as justification-by-recourse-to-nature -- justification of authority, control, oppression -- is chimerical legerdemain (nowadays ConveDDed, conversion-disorder displaced, to the memetime-stamped, block-chained, ₁T₂-only-P2Ply-distributed-information-ledgerdomain) employed to put stoppage to the spontaneous self-organization that otherwise naturally would occur via the quantum potential resident in the cooperative collective superstates, e.g., superfluidity, the “chaos before” (cf. the m-valued logics of animistic-pagan “participation mystique” infrascientifically, via suppressed collective hysteria, deemed “contagion”), which even the Tao Te Ching, in some translations, subscribes to, being the totemic fear-inducing chimera driving insistence upon one form and another of centralized oppression, and all that comes along with those forms. Infrascience produces infratechnologies; infratechnologies produce infraleadership elites -- those elites being composed of those [per}sons most deeply interfaced with, and thus conditioned by, those infratechnologies.

What the actual constitution of Martin Armstrong's “economic confidence model” is, I certainly have not the slightest idea. The 25 June 2025 piece on ArmstrongEconomics, entitled “The Hidden Order We Cannot See”, is mildly interesting in that it assumes absence of a “classical limit” and identifies the notion of linear-time as being a malefactor predisposing to “our most significant error”. His replacement: “I… could visualize that time was not a single dimension but was also three dimensional from the immediate, intermediate (monthly to yearly), and then long-term unfolding in centuries.” Well, this is not Pauli-Paine “3-fold topologically-active operator-time” which is not dimensional, 1D or 3D. Passive, passing, referential linear-time, we hold to be “memetime”: this we consider to have utilitarian value, but no actual relation to nature qua nature. Moreover, we agree with Armstrong's idea that memetime, when treated as if it were an objective component of nature (not a learned behavior glutamatergically anchored to ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains), can be a malefactor predisposing to “our most significant error” (say, with regard to assessments of the current states of Earth's various spheres and the effects of, say, anthropogenic electron-temperature enhancements of Earth's upper spheres). During the second half of the 1970s, we in Doug Paine's office at Cornell clearly saw relevance of the topo-active-optime-formulated, numerical-forecast, nested-grid, macro-meso-microscopic-wave-carried hypercomplex-complex-angular-momentum-cascade model of tornadogenesis to the modeling efforts of Wall Street money managers. One of Paine's grad students went on to a Wall Street position, but we never became aware of Paine-Kaplan cascade theory making an appearance on The Street or across the way in The City. In one of my many letters (the early part of this website initially written as contents of those letters) to the Office of George Soros concerning the idea of _µT_m-valued LETS, I mentioned this relevance -- a mention that generated no interest. Two decades later, with the help of Thai economists and computer scientists at Chula, and promoted by Pramote Nakornthab, a Cornell Ph.D. recipient, a cascade-theory-related “layered-transparent” economic research model proposal was written up and submitted to TDRI, Thailand Development Research Institute. This proposal was not funded, which was not surprising, given the difficulties people everywhere have with anything involving the m-valued.

Concerning the non-dimensionality of Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time, I can recommend as being indirectly supportive “Why and When Can Deep -- but Not Shallow -- Networks Avoid the Curse of Dimensionality”, Tomaso Poggio, et al., CBMM Memo No. 058 (Center for Brains Minds + Machines, MIT's Institute for Brain Research), 4 February 2017. As regards efforts to make an m-logical-value-order-types scraggle up to cognitive assimilation of the “Universal Nature of Discharge Phenomena”-rooted notion ((this being the title to the paper Cornell tornadogenesis numerical modeler, Douglas A. Paine, presented to the “Velikovsky and the Recent History of the Solar System” conference held at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, between June 17-19, 1974, sponsored by the Student Academic Freedom Forum, i.e., the publisher of Pensée, the presentation, that is, which so incensed Carl Sagan that Paine became stigmatically saddled with the Saganesque science-court rubric “pseudoscience”, viability of catastrophism outlasting not only uniformitarianism but also Carl Sagan)) that spontaneous localization, no less than inculcation of memetime-boundedness, is epiphenomenal to bivalent brain processes, we cite “Brain criticality predicts individual levels of inter-areal synchronization in human electrophysiological data”, Marco Fusca, et al., Nature Communications, 14, Article number: 4736, 7 August 2023, as being supportive of our 1980 paper entitled “Some Preliminary Considerations toward Development of a Mathematical Model of the Autogenic Brain Discharge as Spontaneous Localization in Quantum Measurement”, as well as of the neuronal-coherence related entries to the annotated 1985 terminology glossary requested by Wolfgang Luthe, then quote, incorporating A. S. Pressman as quoted in the last section of our linked 1980 paper, the section entitled “Quantum Measurement, Autogenic Discharge, and Biological Information Exchange at Critical States”:

In terms of the present macroquantum description, this isolation is attained as a result of the DNA molecules of a given neural compartment being receptive only to a narrow frequency window of the multitude of frequencies inherent in the referencing frequency domain of the organism. As the multivalued information is localized and transformed into a single-valued representation, it becomes compartmentalized on the basis of frequency windows. The following quotation from A. S. Presman bears directly upon this question:

If the described effects are considered from the standpoint of the concept of diverse EmF interactions within the organism and its interactions with environmental EmFs, then we can sketch a picture which is very convincing in its simplicity and consistency. In fact, we can picture the organism provided with diverse interconnections of such kind (in addition, of course, to the known diverse neurohumoral connections), differentiated as regards their specific “working” frequencies, intensity ranges, and method of coding. Such interconnections may underlie not only the interactions between cells, but also specific interactions between macromolecules: enzyme and substrate, antigen and antibody, DNA and RNA. Similar interconnections may be responsible for the control of protein synthesis. In a recently proposed hypothesis regarding such control (New Biological Effects of R-F, 1959) DNA molecules are regarded as generators of radio-frequency signals, RNA molecules as amplifiers, and enzymes and amino acids as effectors of signals coded in various regions of the spectrum; the cell wall is believed to be a noise filter. [Electromagnetic Fields and Life, Plenum Press, 1970, p. 243]

Integrity of the frequency windows underlying immunological isolation and neurological compartmentalization is dependent upon viability of electron transport chains and unimpaired functioning of pi-electron parcels in macromolecular processes underlying cell metabolism. As described in the superconductant DNA model [linked here], these are scale-interactive critical state processes [think: Fusca, et al., above linked] by which the relative state of the organism is encoded, communicated, and maintained.

Homo sapiens sapiens having -- by collective [theoL-ontoL-cosmoL}ooogical projective-identification as to rigid designation of a non-relative Inchoative Absolute -- made the perfective factative into fiction, proceeded hisstorically, by introjection, to make the fictive into factions. By extension of the involved ₁T₂-only-inferential entailments, can crisp-cum-fuzzy set theory and/or concrete-cum-abstract category theory as the absolute foundation of mathematics (good offices of William Wheeler) serve as the basis for part-is-whole-hologrammic (cf. quasi-fractal-boundary-without-boundary democratized, point-cloud pointed-_hT_op homotopy category ConveDDed, conversion-disorder displaced, to a digital twin) exteriorization of the semantics of inner-Musculpt? Uh, uh, iM-as-mathematics-notation, that is, notation that is facilitative of, cum adequate to, thinking in, rather than ₁T₂ly-thinking about, m-valued logics understood relative to _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+-relative-(incommensurate)-states (including all the state-specific concomitants associated therewith) of identity-transparency (not degrees between absolutely-different and absolutely-same, these degrees defined in terms of a set-theoretic or quasi-set-theoretic membership function: hence, _C+T_C+-states not [0,1]-degrees, unlimited cat theories, à la William Wheeler, necessarily would be absolutely-in-so-far-as ₁T₂ly-inconsistent)? Well, can they serve as such like? If not, as is likely the case, what kind of semantics would be involved -- given that bivalent-logic cum arithmetic cum set-category operations-properties-rules-inferenceprocedures would not necessarily apply?

Kicking back knickknacks of the b[I/i}nary-mind ((e.g., kicking back, via J(r)/h, memetime-bounded-₁T₂ly-construed dynamic “exchange of a virtual particle” in lieu of memetimeless static _µT_m-relative-state identity-transparency)): ack, aye, even for a Heisenbergian Hawkeye, my I/i^m i^magine(s), the Parmenidean not[i}on that -- given the m-valued superposed upon _C+T_C+-AllBaseCommonGround -- “nothing ever happens” is the most difficult aspect of a Realitat (((“derivable from a Hamiltonian” {not from Pauli-Paine 3-fold topologically-active operator-time <<<|>>> think: 1st, 2nd, and 3rd-order temporal CURL <<<|>>> as replacement of the total energy operator in lieu of a total of 8 orthonormal eigenvectors -- quantum so-called “spin” involving no authentic diagonals, let alone null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian _µT_m-skew-perpendicularity -- for a Hamiltonian three spin-angular-momentum-1/2 particle Hilbert space}; [half-integer individuals, integer “bunched together” identity states] bivalently conforming to the ₁T₂-only principle behind [0,1]))) to semantically countenance, let alone m-logically assimilate as ontically “seen” by I/i^m (“I” signifying the “That” of “That art thou”; “i^m” signifying the superposed OBEed-multiple-eyes corresponding to the n-facets of the Husserlian horizon of the ₁T₂-only-defineable discrete object-absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct-from-subject) “looking through” the BackCloth's “layered transparent”. HOWEVER, as regards Parmenides, in “Nothing happens in the Universe of the Everett Interpretation”, arXiv, 31 October 2012, an expostulating Jan-Markus Schwindt earnestly says that: “…factorization absorbs the time evolution of the state vector…” Contextualizing this statement, we quote the full abstract to the paper:

Since the scalar product is the only internal structure of a Hilbert space, all vectors of norm 1 are equivalent, in the sense that they form a perfect sphere in the Hilbert space, on which every vector looks the same. The state vector of the universe contains no information that distinguishes it from other state vectors of the same Hilbert space. If the state vector is considered as the only fundamental entity, the world is completely structureless. The illusion of interacting subsystems is due to a "bad" choice of factorization (i.e. decomposition into subsystems) of the Hilbert space. There is always a more appropriate factorization available in which subsystems don't interact and nothing happens at all. This factorization absorbs the time evolution of the state vector in a trivial way. The Many Worlds Interpretation is therefore rather a No World Interpretation. A state vector gets the property of “representing a structure” only with respect to an external observer who measures the state according to a specific factorization and basis.

But what if in “a 'bad' choice” the “choice” were actually “choices”, plural -- and the “plural” had to do with _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-logical relative-states of identity-transparency of this one-and-only-World rather than with many non-interacting ₁T₂-only Worlds? Gerber-gerber-gerber! Puncta-puncta-puncta! Boscovich “point-centers-of-[quantal]-action” -- barring h or not -- sequinning the Regge-lattice-enboned meshwork like daisies tied into nexuses of stacked screen grids partitioning ornamented sacred rooms of the heavenly domain. No mere _absT_ruse bivalences! Multi-pedaled, uh, petaled, are those daisies, aren't they. P2Ply -- by edgy-_µT_m, not by cloudy-₁T₂ -- enboned, not merely block-chained, “edge computing” over the layered-transparent of the memetime-independent (cf. Schwindt's “…factorization absorbs the time evolution of the state vector…”) m-logically-valued reference space, MVRS BackCloth, not in memetime-stampable mono-scaled binary state space, has to do with boundary changes under the holographic principle whereby m-valued variables of internal system (cf. Schwindt's “illusion of interacting subsystems”) states map to boundaries changed. By contrast, sans the holographic principle, having nixed all attempts at authentic (i.e., identity-transparent part-is-whole hologrammic) decentering, there remains to our GLE, global leadership elite, little else than compulsive centralization of control-dissembled-to-authority-increasingly-incompetent by identification with dissimulated QM and spun-off infratech, in run-up to, general-systems-theoretically speaking, catastrophe-theory-conforming planetary cuspover. Think not so much of the mathematics of breaking waves (see, for the most inspired treatment: Victor P. Starr's “Hydrodynamical Analogy to E = mc²”) as that of wildfire progression: initialization is low-grade at the edge qua periphery, then diminuendo; whereas endgame-crescendo-out is in centered max-megadeath of the forest trees. How the basic catastrophe types play out in the general case relative to cascade dynamics particulars is an area of thought pondered upon ever since the mid-1970s -- SRA/MACV-J2 crossed into Cornell tornadogenesis numerical forecast modeling could hardly have escaped such ponderings -- but, frankly, over the decades it has seemed unwise to air particulars of those ponderings. The VCI, “Viet Cong [political] Infrastructure”, are hisstory's exemplary case for having tacitly utilized the holographic principle before that principle was codified in theoretical physics, but even though they had an Organization Section at upper echelons, they never, from outside their habitus -- however much their familiarity with patterns of nuts-and-bolts bureaucratic minutia -- developed sufficient systemic-self-knowledge as to have consciously acknowledged the age-old identity-transparent animistic “participation mystique” impetus, let alone to have discovered the analogical parallels to contemporary theoretical physics and higher mathematics. Which is not to say that the GLE has done much better. And where does responsibility for that ultimately (not speaking here of proximal perpetrators) lie? IMHO, with our revered logicians, mathematicians, physicists. Note that, after the general notion is stated -- like is the case with treatment of membership-functional quasi-set-theoretic “Schrödinger logic” where within “…a highly probabilistic 'physical infinity' looks considerably more complicated and interesting than a plain infinity of 'things'”, even when having gone to a conception of higher-valued logic -- Schwindt first and foremost prioritizes discussion of “How can the EI [the Everett Interpretation] explain the observed probabilities in quantum measurements?” The “observed probabilities”, we might observe, being those BornRuled so as to preclude m-valued-logical interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction (as distinct from membershipfunction). Substitute: for H, 3-fold Pauli-Paine topo-active-optime execution of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-valued propositions. Substitute: for the m-values of the universal-qua-global statefunction, not the so-regarded probabilities in quantum measurement, but _C+T_C+ logical values, the so-regarded “splitting” being indicative of logical-value order-type transitions. Whereas, alternatively, the observer employing ₁T₂-only-logic alone finds splittings and probabilities. The ₁T₂-only-predicated particles themselves (which they observably are not) and ₁T₂-only so-regarded probabilities are, _µT_mly speaking, [infra}structural [pre}dic[t]ates of infratech. What _µT_m-tech is, my me couldn't possibly know, being unable to think in, that's in, not ₁T₂ly about, _µT_m -- there being no holographically-exteriorized inner-Musculpt as mathematics notation to facilitate such thought, because military purposes have overwhelmingly vectored formulation of the governing “doctrine of uses” (a Swedenborgian term), however tacit that unstated “doctrine” may be. At the end of the above-linked Schrödinger-logic paper it is noted that, “…da Costa's ideas on non-reflexive logics were extended to higher-order systems and to a theory of quasi-sets, so as [to provide] some hints of the applications of such logics to quantum theories”. What about applications to specific processes per se, e.g., DNA helix-coil transition, and -- sans the so-supposed “classical limit” (sans by virtue of null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian _µT_m-skew-perpendicularity and scale-relative m-valued universal physical constants _µT_mly processed by nature) -- tornadogenesis. How much can these two papers concerning the Paine-Kaplan nested-grid, angular-momentum-cascade, numerical-forecast model of tornadogenesis, a model employing the notion of complex and hypercomplex topologically-active operator-time -- see them here and here, both of which were peer-review rejected for publication, 1977 and '78 -- be regarded as prefiguring those linked in the following: titles provided as being significant as regards the issue of prefiguration, caveats obviously required as to contents elaborated?

(1) “Multi-valued vortex solutions to the Schrödinger equation and radiation”, Mark Davidson, arXiv, 5 June 2020.

(2) “Fluctuating Hydrodynamics and Wormholes”, Thomas Banks, arXiv, 16 March 2022.

(3) “Holographic Space-time and Newton's Law”, Tom Banks and W. Fischler, arXiv, 25 October 2013.

(4) “Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time: the Hydrodynamic Approach to Gravity”, Tom Banks, arXiv, 7 February 2025.

(5) “Holographic noise in ET [Einstein Telescope]”, Sergey Tarabrin, Max-Planck institute fur Gravitationsphysik, 3 March 2010.

However, there is a cautionary. Regardless of the many ifs-thens addressed in the paper -- i.e., “The multi-valuedness of the wave function”, Erwin Schrödinger, “Die Mehrdeutigkeit der Wellenfunktion”, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 5:32, 1938, pp. 49-55, translated by D. H. Delphenich -- the following from Schrödinger, IMHO, is of signal importance (given just before the concluding Summary section):

It does not escape me that another theory is also possible, namely, this one: If the configuration space has been multiplied into a kind of Riemann surface then the operators will also conceivably need to be changed, namely, in such a way that the probability of presence will be given, not by the value of psi*psi on one sheet, but by the sum of those quantities over the homologous places on all sheets.

“Self-referential”, “self-reentrant”, “non-orientable”: these terms represent ₁T₂-only-logic-alone takes -- black-box terms, really -- on somewhats and whatnots fully understandable, we must suppose, only by thinking-feeling-experiencing in-by-through _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-valued logics. And not those logical-value order-types reduced to fuzzy-sets-and-quasi-sets membership-functional handlings. Fuzzification of crisp values to degrees of some somewhat, degrees which are geometrically-graphically represented as points on curves spanning the real interval [0,1]. Fuzzy if-then-inference-rules processing by employment of variables defined over fuzzy-or-quasi sets with membership functions represented by curves. The fuzzy output curves defuzzified to crisp values by adaptations of renormalization techniques: max membership taken as the crisp value; center-of-gravity wipeout of “errant” values; weighted average as the crisp value; center-of-sums, as regards “distance” from the centroid, as the crisp value. Fuzzification-defuzzification done so as to allow war-born and BornRuled and war-borne finite-iteration Turing machines supposedly to ₁T₂-only adequately handle that which is indubitably-not ₁T₂-only: hence, infratech -- and the, clearly exceedingly-reductive, infratech-built-up world picture back-channel informing assessments as to the prevailing states of Earth's various spheres, assessments delivered to an increasingly-incompetent-by-identification-with-dissimulated-quantum-based-infratech GLE, global leadership elite, for formulations of policies.

Coming of age in a national-socialist or national-communist society -- whichever the preference is to designate the American military socius -- no higher enculturation or DC-swamp close-approach exposure is needed to understand the whys and wherefores as to how civilian self-image cultivates comp[re}hension of the route to success: doing what you are told as if it were simply fulfilling reasonable requirements of what is expected of you. The short road to contempt-driven silent insolence as the dominant affect charging emotivity of youth: growing older and older, more and more clearly seeing how justified was the youthful assessment, however inarticulate -- childhood judgments being the most trustworthy for their general lack of vectoring by explicit vested interests. So: born, raised, and growed-up under the stamp-down imposed by “these 'people'” (noids are not necessarily [human}noids), nascently from 1953 -- mil.brat “running wild” in FLW's Imperial Hotel -- and implicitly from 1963 -- AU-SIS -- and explicitly from 1966-'67 -- SFTG and PsyopsGroup/JFKSWCS and TID/525thMIG -- and even more explicitly from 1968 -- CICV-Targets and SRA/MACV-J2 -- and most explicitly from 1975 -- Cornell Mathematics Library reading Emil Post's 1921 Ph.D. dissertation on _µT_m-valued logics -- I knew that the pull-the-temple-down-upon-itself-Samson-complexed U.S. leadership elite inheritors of the BE (just contemplate, whydon'tya, however seemingly obscure to binary-mind, the involved collective ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement: dimensions there placed by introjective processes, then projected into all[i}ance-concretion-haptification upon ponderablespacememetime) would not go softly into that good night of relative parity with the rest of the “international system” as coming planetary resource-depletion cuspover raised its ornery head, that it would engage in strategic offensive initiatives forcing formation -- however prolonged and staggered be the lead-ins so as to effectuate justified plausible deniability, most especially denial to ones-own superego[i}c [con}science; however great be the induced all[i}ance realignments of the all[i}ed -- of a Mahayana Buddhist Bloc aligned to a Germano-Russian Bloc. To this degree and that, I argued that forecast, then-unto-now, and currently can see nothing to quench, and much to support, likelihood of that outcome as configuring the bivalence informing the binary opposition configuring the force-structure stand-to occasioning the third major battle of the 200-years-War-of-the-World mounted largely due to ramification upon ramification of presentings experimentally manifesting upon the back of N. H. Abel's 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr. Going to the meta-level -- say, to the notion of a meta-loom -- is really hard for most people, especially those with technical expertise in some performative. Ask, further, for a transition from remnant-₁T₂-legacy-decays to nth-times-over-[re}jected-_µT_m? Just forget about it. Quantum-brain barrier penetration, a disused faculty possessed by all, is simply too much to request of those navigating -- honk-honk smatters the roof-brain-chatter gaggles waddling their clang-clanging trolly -- a moldering feeling-space configured like a beehive bouffant. Contents of inner-talking's affectively-charged inversive wam on cognitive maw -- largely ₁T₂-only-rationalized into blanket denial -- is most revealing as to actually-effectuated motivations -- say, informed by “internal considering” -- for policy formulations, e.g., decade after decade doing little to nothing to remove the millions upon millions of units of unexploded ordinance left behind on the HCM trail in Laos, plus tariff pile-on, plus visa denial. Because of the fast train to NK's Freedom, uh, uh, Friendship, Bridge? Heh-heh-heh! Getting anything and everything -- whatsoever of global resources -- for free simply by “printing” the money ain't good enuf: the poorest of the poor must be made to pay opportunity costs for the right to give over for free access to their meager resources. This is great -- right?

Yes, but. However! The meta-loom is still -- m-millennia later -- an operative “transference”-baring cosmo-meta-pherein: microscopically, Schrödinger's multi-sheeted Riemann-surface BackCloth; macroscopically, Novikov-dusted Sakharov multi-sheet model of the universe! The tropological meta-referential dimension of our fashionable contemporary rag trade fades off into the reach of infantility by comparison to sophistication of that of yore, residuals of which are to be found in almost-current “primitive” cultures worldwide. As regards “back-cloth”, see “Shape Space Methods For Quantum Cosmological Triangleland”, arXiv, 18 October 2010, wherein the author, Edward Anderson, in his Abstract, says:

…I tessellate the 2-sphere by its physical interpretation as the shape space of triangles, and then use this as a back-cloth from which to read off the interpretation of dynamical trajectories, potentials and wavefunctions.

As regards the m-millennia-before triangle motif in ancient weave, say, for example -- one among the myriad especially densely packed over stretch of S.E. Asia -- Philippine ancestral weave, see: “Weaving Symmetry of the Philippine Northern Kankana-ey”, Nathaniel A. Baylas IV and Teofina A. Rapanut and Ma. Louise Antonette N. De Las Penas, Mathematics Department of Ateneo de Manila University, in Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture and Culture, Proceedings of the Bridges 2011 Conference. Yes, but. However! Be aware that the BackCloth cosmological metaphor has had a very big downside in hisstory. In the Abstract to his “Hierarchial set definition by Q-analysis, part I. The hierarchical backcloth”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18:4, April 1983, pp. 337-59, J. H. Johnson says:

Well defined sets are the prerequisite vocabulary for scientific inquiry, and often admit a hierarchical structure which naturally occurs in vernacular language. The conglomerate of natural, vernacular and technical languages is called the hierarchical soup, a pre-logical primordial source containing the building blocks of subsequent structures. The soup is not an allowable set in the mathematical sense and, although well suited to creative inductive thinking, it is inadequate for the analytic sequel.

Yes, but. However! Well, hmmm: realize that ₁T₂ly-well-defined sets (and even fuzzy and quasi sets) are inadequate for the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-analytic sequel -- or, well, uh, more directly to the centroid, are inadequate for decompositional demergence of the _C+T_C+-AllBase-most-dense-sheet via _CT_C+ unto the _µT_m-“hierarchical soup” unto the ₁T₂-building-blocks of subsequent absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct structures of Buddhological VR-illusionistic Maya. As regards “the aggregation of patterns of numerical values (traffic) over the hierarchical backcloth”, see “Hierarchical set definition by Q-analysis, part II. Traffic on the hierarchical backcloth”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18:5, May 1983, pp. 467-87, wherein J. H. Johnson says:

The traffic has a combinatorial structure called supertraffic [be aware that, not incidentally, Solly Angel, a member of the “Berkeley mafia” that, for a generation, dominated urban and regional planning consultancies worldwide, wrote his Ph.D. dissertation as an application of Einstein's General Relativity theory of gravity to modelling urban traffic flow patterns: think, please, curvature-dictated “collective unconscious” event gradients!] which is represented by composite pattern polynomials. t-u-Forces and polynomial forces are defined and investigated, and the implications for hierarchical classification discussed.

Yes, but. However! Einstein's General Relativity put “forces” into Newton's laundry of the grab bag of hisstory! The non-logos-cum-non-ontologos cosmological preference functions nowadays are related to superspace geometrodynamics -- or should be. Ontologos and logos appertaining to the pregeometric uncompositing of pattern polynomials and the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of pre-pregeometry numbering Wheelerian “buckets of dust” -- the involved decomposition-demergence being executed by Pauli-Paine 3-fold topologically-active operator-time execution of the nir[van}ic non-selfsame-number numbered cosmo[gone}ic propositions. As regards the BackCloth cosmological metaphor having had a very big downside in hisstory, I point out that, while Edward A. Gargan noted (p. 210, The River's Tale, Vintage paperback edition, 2003), relative to the Cambodian holocaust, that he “…was seeking some explanation of mass murder on such a scale…”, he never really came up with a necessary and sufficient cause -- largely, IMHO, [be}cause, heh-heh-heh, cause-push/attractor-pull had gone, à la Jung-Pauli, to the acausal-un[attractor}ed thematic orchestration characteristic of a dream, in this case of a nightmare. Gargan quotes (p. 233) David Chandler -- no book title provided -- as suggesting a connection between “grandiosity”-imposition of the mass slave labor involved in constructing and maintaining the Angkor empire and the “megalomania”-programmatic Khmer Rouge pogrom (of, IMHO, attempting to recover the nonselfsame-self-definition characteristic of animistic “participation mystique” through regressed forced-re[rural}I/i^m|zation). Gargan, on p. 260, again quotes Chandler -- no book title provided -- as having written, “…it [the corpus of extremities manifest as the holocaust] was unique.” But, while this notion of an Angkor-empire precedent should not be discounted, it, alone, seems an inadequate explanation, not least as the ancient Egyptian pyramid-building case, so far as I know, led only to expulsion of the Jews, not to a gargantuan holocaust -- the Holocaust of the Jews coming m-millennia later. So, given the above-given, is it ridiculous to look for a common cause-push/attractor-pull gone to Jung-Pauli acausal-un[attractor}ed thematic orchestration for these two enormities -- the “forced-draft deurbanization” compensatory-abreactive General-Relativity-theory-mimicking blackhole-like “back-reaction upon the metric” of Samuel P. Huntington's free-fire-zoned “forced-draft urbanization” Khmer Rouge case (also see the Abstract), the “purified-identity”-seeking Nazi case? Under impress of collective psychosis, proximal perpetrators are a dime a dozen, a population subset which collective unconscious processes can easily replace; whereas, those agents'/agencies' psychodynamics which are responsible for induction of the governing regressed-archetypal gradients are not so easily replaced, and therefore incur unmitigated culpability. If the non-orientable political-economy Möbius band <<<|>>> anarcho-syndicalism || anarcho-capitalism <<<|>>> is doubly-cut, doubly-twisted, doubly-pasted <<<|>>> national communism || national socialism <<<|>>> what is returned is the cylindrical-nozzle roll cloud of the feeder band to the resultant vortical-flow of political-economy cyclogenesis. [Dys}terpretation of the [cosmo}gnomic [de}mergence-cum-[re}mergence -- tacitly unto intentionally -- is necessarily driven by, and sufficiently induces, grandiosity and megalomania. Why? Tropologically stripping away the _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-transfinite-cardinality-part-IS-whole hologrammic pre-pregeometric and pregeometric encoding rigidifies the hierarchy into a monolithic structure, such that, when used as an institutional metaphor, justifies “hierarchical classification” caste-I-gation-disenfranchisement of the mass of hu-hu-hu[man}ity, centralization of powers and net-worths, broad-banding of the thin-blue-line, and, ultimately, when existential threat to self-definition goes to cuspover, mass extermination of the other even when the other is self -- a compensatory-abreactive ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the collective denial of part-IS-whole transmogrified to “the horror, the horror” of animistic-pagan “participation mystique” _µT_m-relative-state-identity-transparent other-IS-self/self-IS-nonselfsame. Yes, but. However! Nothing here I wasn't arguing half a century ago.

There was strong immediate resonance quickly becoming consonance upon my meeting Cornell professor Doulgas A. Paine at the 1974 McMaster University Velikovsky conference (much of this sort of recently aired material being discussed in the hallways). But it takes a little JoeBlow biography to understand why there was this “no introduction required”. I had been thinking of DNA being some sort of superconductor ever since the notion first came to me during the period -- after having been “dusted”-off (Trickster-archetype cueing later associated this with Sri Aurobindo's “warm-golden dust” and later yet with John A. Wheeler's “bucket of dust”, an unaccountable association that nonetheless eventually vectored me to learning of the existence of the Regge calculus) -- when I was in and out of high-fever-induced delirium, post-surgery for MFWs received from an IED explosion deep in the Mekong delta over near the Cambodian border, circa late-1967, the 12th Evac Hospital, Cu Chi, the nightly mortaring forcing me in and out of bed, excruciating and messy given nature of the wounds and that I was iced over for the fever (diagnosed FOUO, after ruling out post-surgical shock, falciparum malaria, scrub typhus, dengue, some others). The DNA idea was made possible of me not only because of my having gone through SF medic training, but also because I not only had honors PSSC physics in high school, but very well liked chemistry -- not so much biology. After returning to the ZI from Viet Nam, and following the lapse of a year or so, I began, in my spare time, weekends mostly, looking into plausibility/implausibility of the superconductant DNA idea: Georgetown U. and George Washington U. medical school libraries, and the National Library of Medicine. I was reading into systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) because of that disease's progression from self-antibodies to anti-DNA antibodies to the diagnostic LE cell when I ran across a paper of Russian authorship documenting correlation between the sunspot cycle and SLE outbreaks. Beyond UV exposure inducing fulmination periods in the individual patient, there appeared to be another anti-homeostatic dimension of radiative induction, a dimension I tentatively factored into my growing idea about DNA superconductivity. During this period, I inadvertently came upon a paper about the “autogenic brain discharges” (a possible autopoietic source of intra-organismic qua intracerebral radiative stimulation -- or so it seemed to me -- indicative of another dimension of radiation involvement, in this case pro-homeostatic) associated with the practice of Autogenic Training. I acquired Wolfgang Luthe's books and whilst studying them, I wrote and asked him if AT had been found useful adjunctive therapy in treatment of SLE. He wrote back asking me how I had arrived at that idea, as just recently a Prof. Abe in Tokyo had written a yet-to-be-published article on that subject. This was the beginning of our correspondence. Soon thereafter I was sitting in the audience at the McMaster U. Velikovsky conference when Doug Paine, a specialist in the numerical forecast modeling of tornadogenesis, went to the lectern to deliver his paper entitled “The Universal Nature of Discharge Phenomena”. Well, this was exciting, to say the least -- as my personal engagement and major-life-decisions thrust (e.g., deciding to quit college so as to get on “the road to find out”) with regard to this whole direction of thought began in the political domain with the notion of “epileptic seizures” within the socius (preorganic collective sociocognitive seizures altogether subclinical for having become sufficiently widespread across the population corpus as to yield normotic disinhibition to, for instance, initialization of mass warfare). The particular case constellating this notion in me: a “seizure” qua “autogenic” discharge -- well, that's wrong: actually autopoietic discharge -- of lynch-mob behavior which physically (“psychomotor” as in psyche-to-motor?) felt like a rapidly spreading electric force “grabbing hold of you”, impelling you -- if the effects of that “force” were internally resisted (act of the “will”?). Early-fall, 1963, packed AU gymnasium, thirteen of George Lincoln Rockwell's “storm troopers” calling out “Sieg Heil! Kill all the fucking Communists and Jews!” on this substantially-Westchester-County-populated campus at a public symposium protesting -- HUAC-no! HUAC-no! HUAC-no! -- the House Unamerican Activities Committee held by members of the CPUSA that snapped into shear pandemonium-brawl involving much of the audience in indiscriminate fighting and severe beatings of the North Arlington American Nazi Party provocateurs (see our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, Vol. 1, pp. 646-8). It ended when swarmed with police (while, at the time, this got WaPo coverage, it didn't make the current Wiki page on GLR). I -- having recently turned 18 -- was just then, at that neoNazi juncture, beginning my first reading into C. G. Jung and the experience of the near-instantaneous spreading (later understood relative to the snapping to infinity of correlation length at self-organized criticality) of “collective cognitive seizure” factored deeply into my general assessment of what was happening to the American psyche relative to the Viet Nam war -- and precursors? as I then posed the question to myself. Collective behavior -- etiology, pathogenesis and course? This was a question posed during discussions with the fellow living upstairs in our shared Potomac Palisades house: he being a Med student at GU. I didn't have much in the way of particulars as regards the idea of collective psychosis at that point, but ideas came along as I gathered experiences over the years of being on “the road to find out”. Endemic subclinical-petit-mal-induced cognitive impotence supervening on anxiety-phobic-depersonalization syndrome. “Mass-formation”-psychosis-unto-collective-psychosis: the corpus of states thereof constituting the inorganic psychoses constellated on the BackCloth which is the universal covering of “triangleland” (the stacked-and-compacted mini-inside-macro-column hexagonal modularity in architectonics of the cerebral cortex -- knowledge of this going back at least to 1940s-McCulloch [I was, upon this and that visitation to GU and GWU, embarrassed over and over by University of Basel research biochemist qua psychopharmacologist Roland Fisher, a person early involved at Sandoz with research on the psychedelic properties of LSD, per the story of which I was told, who said to me that I evoked for him the young McCulloch, okay, but he kept introducing me as such! to members of the psychiatry faculties of GU and GWU Med Schools: I much later asked John C. Lilly about Fisher, whom he said he'd never heard of, upon declaration of which I threw up my hands] and later elaborated by Janos Szentagothai as “Architecture of the Cerebral Cortex”, in H. H. Jasper, A. A. Ward and A. Pope (eds.), Basic Mechanisms of the Epilepsies, Little, Brown, and Company, 1969; the best recent papers on the subject I've found are “Hexagonal Approach and Modeling for the Visual Cortex”, Algis Garliauskas and Alvydas Soliunas, Informatica, 11:4, January 2000, pp. 397-410, and “Fullerenic-topological tools for honeycomb nanomechanics. Toward a fullerenic approach to brain functions”, Arturo Tozzi and James F. Peters and Ottorino Ori, Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures, 25:4, 25 April 2017, both of these papers mentioning stack compaction to 2D, a ₁T₂-only-logical mimicking of most-dense-sheet _C+T_C+-T_zog-chen AllBaseCommonGround -- being an equilateral-triangular case thereof as demergently “made” organic at cellular-architectonic concretion: I schematized this with a diagram presented in our 1980 paper entitled “Some Preliminary Considerations toward Development of a Mathematical Model of the Autogenic Brain Discharge as Spontaneous Localization in Quantum Measurement” written at the joint request of Luthe and Fisher for the Autogenic Therapy dedicated issue of the Journal of Altered States of Consciousness which never came out because the journal folded just prior to that issue's publication). “Made”, in the sense of my take, equals topologically-active operator-time execution (with such “.exe” there is no having to choose between the logic-gate model and the topological-configs model: both together being the case -- heh-heh-heh!) of quasi-Regge-latticed Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of nonlocal-quantum-brain _µT_m-propositions (think: mediated by molecular concretions of 3-fold temporal CURL). My involvement with this general idea of sociological field theory is apocryphally recounted in The Moon of Hoa Binh, 1994, Vol. 1, pp. 597-601 (using some of the ideas formulated on the back of analytical work on VCI dynamics -- particularly VCI prefigurative use of the “holographic principle” by tacit [likely subliminally informed by peasant-carried residuals of age-old _µT_m-logical-“participation mystique”] mapping of internal bureaucratic variables upon frequently changing boundaries -- accomplished by a dozen of us [find them, ask them!] at SRA/MACV-J2, circa 1968: see the extensive documentation of this suppressed thesis provided in our novel, documentation cited with the actual “captured enemy document logging numbers” given by CDEC, et al.). That this thrust of thought is currently gaining credence in cognitive psychology, specifically in regards to extensions of decision field theory into the notion of quantum cognition is exemplified by Thang Nhut Nguyen's Human Decisions with Hidden and Malicious Intent in Business and Management, ‎Cambridge Scholars, 12 August 2024 (brought to my attention by programmer Trieu Kham, a classmate of Nguyen Thang Nhut at the same high school my wife Nha Trang attended). This book describes formulation of an extended decision sigma-field (quoting the excerpt provided here):

…to include neuropsychological examination of decision makers, as well as further extension to considerations (a) on decision entanglement using quantum field, and (2) on decision cause-effect from different frames of reference in a Minkowski curved decision spacetime. Together they form an embedded decision field.

Elaborations maintain that, “At this [quantum] level they [human decisions] can also be conceived as [a] continuous field (waveform) like temperature in water, air, etc.”; and, furthermore -- considering insights from Minkowski-Leibnitz-Einstein and quoting John A. Wheeler's famous statement concerning matter and spacetime curvature -- the question is asked, “Could we [analogously] consider 'Human decision in curved spacetime tells entities (institution, business, market, economy) how to move and these entities tell decision spacetime how to curve?'” Shades of my “collective unconscious event gradients, regressed-archetypal or no”. There are also the progressed-archetypal event-gradients: frangipani aura and the sense of a state of grace, walking on air satin smooth and thick, asterisms ringing the ears, happy hellos, dogs and birds approach, cats stay away… Anyway, it appears that probability, classical and consensus quantum, still plays an important role in prevailing extensions of decision field theory -- an orientation which I obviously reject, given my _µT_m-relative-states-of-identity-transparency interpretation of the import, for understanding of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction, of Emil Post's last sentences, circa 1921, to wit, once again quoting his paper entitled “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, American Journal of Mathematics, XLIII:3, p. 185:

We must however take into account the fact that our development [rigorous “derivation” of _µT_m logics] has been given in the language of ₁T₂ and for that very reason every other kind of system appears distorted. This suggests that if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation, then it would be the formal system most in harmony with regard to the two developments.

For me, instead of probabilistic sequences in me|me[T_AI}me, qua memetime, glutamatergically anchored to egosphere, there are coherent-to-decoherent _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂-demergents on Riemann-sphere of cyclotomic decomposition under orchestrative execution by Pauli-Paine topo-active optime. Social-anthropologically speaking: distant “lesions” (misnumbered numberings of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers on triangleland's Regge lattices?) -- i.e., deep-seated regressed-archetypal epileptogenic foci of the collective unconscious -- inducing “temporal” [topo-active optime, not temples-lobes] seizures of the socius in the near-abroad of ₁T₂-only molecular-cellular brains. Sx: for instance, in sound bites during photo ops, ictal speech automatisms [which can become crowd-funded: e.g., HUAC-no! HUAC-no! HUAC-no!] and swearing, accompanied by impulsive givings-of-the-bird, so on, so forth, unto the incommensurately more-transference-elaborated Hitlerian symptomatology. Ack, aye, when the psychos are given the responsibility for civilizing society: diffuse-mental-state disorders (not ₁T₂ly resolvable) associated with intracranial self-stimulation by comic-book-facilitated Jungian “active imagination” gone to the movies, these disorders being antecedents of the drug-induced organic psychoses, e.g., amp[he}ta|mine psychosis, as chronicled in, for instance, the DrugScope sequel to the JASC. I, of course, early-on read Noth B. Weeney's The Robot Use of Human Beings and Muckle Catchem's The Termination of Mankind: Last of Man Being First. One really ought to, y'know, delve into Jay Birdwell's On Unknowing: The Right-Handed Essays.

I haven't always been successful at staying distant from indulging in ridicule -- rather childish it is, what! -- but I've sincerely tried. That effort has kept me away from looking into research on DNA conductivity for quite a long period. I largely gave that up decades ago -- circa 1997 -- after failing in application for a secretary job -- not so strange, really, making such an application, given 90-100 words/minute, more or less, few errors: Eielson AFB H.S. typing classes, I & II, that was on a mechanical typewriter! nothing, eh, compared to my friend Karen's day-in/day-out legal-secretary super-performance speed trials always yielding her a job-at-the-drop-of-a-hat -- application mail-submitted to a new spin-off of the Santa Fe Institute: Bios Group, with start-up mega-funding including, so I was proudly told in the job interview, from the USMC to apply SFI-complexity theory so as to improve small-unit-cohesion dynamics, something I knew a bit about ((given -- whoa! having by then drawn-out, overrun, and spun-off the “road to find out”-- all I had long-before learned, whilst in SFTG and at the JFKSWCS-qua-assigned-for-administrative-purposes-to-PsychologicalOperationsGroup, from seeking out and finding face-to-faces with, hmmm, oh well, “so many”; how they do love to tell their life-stories to young-naive sycophantic-qua-psychophantasmagoric fawning-upons: a member of one of the Laos half-teams who was very introspectively-adept and informative concerning specific ontic phenomenological properties of “high combat” [the rescindings of “team integrity” and “mission-specific assignment” were minor considerations in my decision to quit SF in the final week of Dog Lab]; SF medic-class training cadres wearing Darby's Rangers and Merrill's Marauders patches on their right shoulders [what did these guys do over the two decades post-1945? find members of my 1966-SF-medic class; ask them! heh-heh-heh]; one operator who, post-WWII, spent a lot of time assigned to ops run in and from Tibetan monasteries and later helped organize the “sterile” incursions upon Yunnan circa pre-25-June-1950; a, not surprisingly, hey, this being only 1966, still-in-SF -- awaiting retirement -- Lodge-Bill-recruit-participant in the 1960 “Congo Crisis” and, later, the 1962 “Sino-Indian war”; Hollywood rarely does its homework adequately, so often so laughable, e.g., the character Robert De Niro plays is portrayed in The Deer Hunter film as returning from the 5th SF Group as a mere buck sgt., not at all likely, having inevitably received that rank upon “transiting to Group” from SFTG whilst still at Bragg, and with a Ranger patch, no less; hah! Airborne Rangers there were, yep, but who, as an EM who successfully made it through SFTG would be sent to Ranger School before being sent to the 5th? Nobody! Yessiree, the only SFers who could be bothered with Ranger School attendance, too busy with important stuff, were company-grade officers who never went through SFTG -- likely would not have made it through in those days when there were, at most, only a couple thousand, less depending on exactly when the assay was taken, Green Berets worldwide -- and were only punching their career-aspirational tickets with an SF jaunt; in the Deer-Hunter bowling-alley scene, De Niro is finally an E6 with the SF patch on his right shoulder, left shoulder some other unit insignia, and still, OMG, he's wearing the beret with 5th flash: Hollywood, heh-heh-heh!)). I included with the job application mail-in to Bios Group a copy of our 1979 superconductant DNA paper, and the management-type person who interviewed me, consequentially, I supposed, had a Los Alamos physicist -- imagine that! mere application for a secretary job -- come all the way down to Santa Fe and sit-in on the job-application interview. I remember quite well that toward the end of the interview, the LA physicist, after testingly questioning me concerning my understanding, or lack thereof, of the imports of the equations given in our paper, asked me why I thought there had been, over the years, no experimental substantiation of DNA superconductivity, the thesis of our paper. I said I thought it plausible that the whole field of biological superconductivity had been abruptly classified soon after our paper was published by the Swedish International Journal of Quantum Chemistry -- not that I thought that that paper could have been a sufficient trigger, only that happenstance could have been involved. He sat back in his chair and made no further contributions to the secretary-job interview. The non-classified researchers are always thinking that what is conducted must be electricity, and that the conductor must be the DNA-sugar-phosphate backbone (studied with intercalated or pendent donors). Humph! There's that ridicule slipping in. Naughty-naughty. Oh, well, shades of D. A. Paine's history of cascade-theory-paper submissions, as revealed to me in testimonial -- no matter to what atmospheric science journal submission was made, one specific leading-expert-in-the-field was always the main peer reviewer: no exceptions -- saying, in one case, that he couldn't understand what superconductance of "hydrothermodynamic properties" could possibly mean. As regards the DNA case -- hence, not peer-reviewed by this tornado-expert peer -- the “gravitational acceleration” had to be, we [pre}judged, re-named the “counter-force to the pressure-gradient term”: heh-heh-heh! Otherwise, peer-review condolences would indubitably have prefiguratively [pre}vailed. Nowadays, however, this statement:

In the majority of experiments on charge transfer in DNA, the charge is carried not by electrons, but by holes… Overlapping of electron pi-orbitals of neighboring pairs will lead to delocalization of the hole over the chain and its capture by nucleotides with lower oxidation potentials.

from the Introduction section to “The Problem of DNA Conductivity”, V. D. Lakhno, of the Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology, RAS, Pushchino, Russia, published in a Russian journal, circa 2008, impels me to once again look into the published corpus of relevant non-classified literature. Got that: “capture of delocalization by nucleotides”? A Freudian slip? I think: not so. Demergence, eh what! When in early November of 1963 I stepped out of Samuel Weiser's Occult and Oriental Bookshop onto the Broadway sidewalk carrying a copy of volume one of J. G. Bennett's The Dramatic Universe (bought because of the appendix on “pencils of skew-parallels”) and was asked if I wanted to join a Gurdjieff group, I replied that I did not live in NYC and didn't know what a Gurdjieff group was. Despite this early prompting, being slow, it took me until well after I'd returned from the VN war to read into Gurdjieff material sufficiently as to become aware of the Gurdjieff term “kundabuffer” (here we find an example of the sort of commentary that has congealed around this term). By then, my ideas about DNA superconductivity had formed enough for me to contemplate the notion of “kundabuffer” relative to quenching (ultimately yielding cut off of conscious access to the _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-processing engaged in by the quantum brain) of the quantum-wave properties (essential to a superconductant DNA pi-electron gas -- not sugar-phosphate-backbone superconductivity) of nuclear and mitochondrial intraneuronal and intraperineural (think: glia) DNA at helix-coil transition. Anyway, nowadays it seems to me that, given what the mass of hu-hu-[hu}manity has tolerated, indeed embraced, in regards to institutional failure over the last several thousand years, it is easy to imagine that what is currently considered to be normal glutamate titers may once have been glutamate flooding qua glutamate excitotoxicity (see especially the “Cascade process of excitotoxic neuronal death” section of “Molecular mechanisms of excitotoxicity and their relevance to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases -- an update”, Wei-long Wu, et al., Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 19 May 2025) sufficient to etiology and pathogenesis of normopathy-made-normative. Quoting the summary statement made in the “Introduction” section to “Inflammation, Glutamate, and Glia: A Trio of Trouble in Mood Disorders”, Ebrahim Haroon and Andrew H. Miller and Gerard Sanacora, Neuropsychopharmacology, 42:1, 26 October 2016, pp. 193-215:

…we propose the hypothesis that the effects of inflammation on glia initially lead to an increased release and “spillover” of glutamate into the extrasynaptic space by decreasing the capacity of glial transporters to buffer [note use of this word -- by me seen relative to the Gurdjieff term] and clear glutamate… This glutamate spillover in combination with glutamate released by activated or primed glial and immune cells can activate extrasynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and lead to atrophy and regression of dendritic spines and processes and loss of synaptic integrity, ultimately resulting in neuronal loss… Moreover, increases in extrasynaptic glutamate can also stimulate presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR2/3) leading to reductions in synaptic glutamate transmission… In addition, alterations in the ratio between synaptic and extrasynaptic activation of ionotropic receptors by glutamate can result in the loss of synaptic fidelity and specificity of neurotransmission, contributing to circuit dysfunction…

With regard to etiology of neurodegenerative disease, we quote the “Conclusions and cautions” section of “Divide and Die: Cell Cycle Events as Triggers of Nerve Cell Death”, Karl Herrup, et al., The Journal of Neuroscience, 24:42, 20 October 2004, pp. 9232-39:

In neurodegenerative disease as well as in normal development, we are becoming aware that the state of the genome is not always static. Major genomic changes involving extensive amounts of new DNA synthesis can occur… That genome-level changes occur is certain. It is the nature of these events that is unclear at present. The questions that remain are large but clear. What is the state of the genome in a CNS neuron? The prohibition against cell division can be overcome in most other cells (hence, the large number of different types of cancer), but there are hints that things are not straightforward in the brain… So what is different about a nerve cell? What is it about the reengagement of a cell cycle process that kills a neuron? It would help the discovery process if we could determine whether the events described in this article represent a true mitotic cell cycle or something different.

Is that something which is different captured by the kundabufferish-notion of quenching as mentioned above?

Given my kundabufferish-notion-type-quenching thesis ((what modernocentric Julian Jaynes reductively deemed to be mere “auditory hallucinations”, my I/i^m, [Prime}ordialists that they[it] are[is], take to have been Aurobindoian-_µT_mly-“supramental” inner-Musculpt symformphonie, the gods of mythology being tropes for the figurative archetypal imagos, these imagos being tropes for the archetypes-in-themselves as transcendental to prime ideals [think: “absence of uniqueness of factorization” in the topologically-active-operator-time chronogrammic Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbering isopsephism of _µT_m-logical hexagonal meshwork-foams] qua mathematical relation-structures, which -- were inner-Musculpt holographically techno-exteriorized as mathematics notation -- would be rigorously demonstrated to be the gematria-like semantic contents of symformphonic cinerama)), the big problem for Homo sapiens sapiens has/would-have been the glutamate-flooded prescriptive-enculturation-socialization cutoff of conscious access to the m-logically-valued processing of the nonlocal wave-effect quantum-brain. However, a likely derivative problem has/would-have been reestablishment of limbic-“paleomammalian-cortical” quasi-dominance over cerebral cortices not only in situations of actual existential threat but also at conflation of challenges to integrity -- particularly logical challenges -- of Weltanschauung and Lebenswelt foundational notions, e.g., the “participation mystique” challenge to the ₁T₂-only-logic Law of Identity, with actual existential threats (this “lower-order-emotional-processing”-constellated conflation being deeply involved in modernist etiology of mass warfare, like our current 200-Years War of the World culminating in…). Look at the numinous (it takes 8 to get 6: octonions required for 3 of space and 3 of topo-active optime?) numerosity of human 6-layer hexagonal-meshworked cerebral neocortex (as regards memetemporal-framed years old, the best I've found in the Evo-Devo-approach is: “During 100 million years of separation from a common ancestor, the mouse and human cerebral cortex…”) with the “I/iⁿ” of a Jasper Johns. On each interneuron intersection point of the cytoarchitectonic hexagonal meshwork, the digital ₁T₂-only-processing molecular-cellular brain “sees” only a 0 or a 1; whereas the analog _µT_m-processing quantum brain Joe Goode “looking-through” (search the term in the linked article) “sees” all the other numbers that are ensheaved there on each of those points JasperJohns-like, à la 0 Through 9.

Gene[is}us 6:3:1, “Let there be” _C+T_C+ universal functor covering of the man[i}fold of Higher Heaven; _CT_C+ functional configuration space of Heaven; _µT_m function state space of Lower Heaven; hexagram arrays; trigram maps; 3-heads continuous line; 3-tails middle-third-cutout line: only with fruition of middle-third-cutout-line Cantor dust is the ₁T₂-only-logically-definable absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct discrete particle-atom-object event in ponderablespacememetime fully demergent as content of binary-minds. The unrelenting growth -- Archaic to Classical to Hellenistic -- in identification-exclusivity with IBE, in-the-body experience (((as to Greek OBE, see: [1} “Corporeality and Thickness: Back on Melissus' Fragment B9”, Mathilde Bremond, Revista Archai, December 2021, wherein the question is asked, “How can something that is both extended and full be at the same time bodiless?”; my answer being that that which is ₁T₂-embodied-cum-localized is a demergent of the nonlocal-_µT_m-bodiless, ₁T₂ being one logical-value-order-type of _µT_m; and [2} Sabine Neumann's review of Yulia Ustinova's Divine Mania: Alteration of Consciousness in Ancient Greece, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 19 September 2018; and [3} for the reverse view, i.e., exclusive-IBE-identification came before normative access to OBEs, see Octavian Gabor's review of Brooke Holmes' The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, March of 2011, quoting Gabor: “The novelty of her approach rests on her suggestion that it was not the psyche, but rather the soma that came first”))) signified by the gathering musculature obsession testified to by stylistic evolution of Greek sculpture up until Act[i}um, circa 3:1 (lowest-order of triage genesis) B.C.E., uh, that is, the prescriptive-enculturation-socialization-programmed identification-exclusivity with IBE which glutamatergically anchored bivalent atomism and “derivative” act[i}on-based “everything is nothing but changes” particle theory of matter to the molecular-cellular brains populating the West, thus chaining the social structure of attention cathexes to the most-reduced of Lebenswelts, those analogically modeled upon Heraclitean Weltanschauung principles to exclusion of Parmenidean Weltanschauung principles. Not so with the I-Ching, for its chronomancy is based upon, “What now lays in the future lies in the past”, not upon F. W. Maitland's “What now lies in the past once lay in the future” ((the historian, Maitland, is epigraphically quoted in Robert Harris' his[stow}rue|ical novel Munich, a book I find instructive as read again, today, on this occasion of the reader imagining the German mindset in London and the British mindset in Moscow: having only just argued, in an AU-SIS Am Civ seminar, circa 1964, that the 18th-century institutional base needs an upgrade in order to reestablish consonance with the evolving worldview construct, I after-seminar “squibbed” [archaic: that, apparently, was how it was received] to Prof. Elspeth Rostow that I believed that, if the Europeans do not find an institutional embodiment authentically based upon analogies to quantum principles of self-organization, the consequent cognitive dys[son}antsy will mass mesmerize into conjuration-promulgation of a third self-destruction rooted in all the very same thematic inducers as were the cases with the first two _[him}mo[lay}T_|i|ons)). Notice that, in both the chronomantic's and the historian's takes, the whole of ₁T₂-only-definable memetime is construed to lay-lady-lie cum lie-lady-lay -- a substantive difference being that the I-Ching clearly incorporates events into the “what”, whereas Maitland's “what” likely was referring only to the real-numerable instants of the directed, passive, passing, referential timeline itself. But there is an even bigger difference. In the jacket notes to the recording of the Seiji Ozawa conducted performance of “November Steps”, the composer, Toru Takemitsu, is quoted as having said, “There is a time difference between Tokyo and New York.” I took this to mean a time concept difference: horizontal and out-to-in emergent for the West; vertical and in-to-out demergent for the East -- logical-ontological-existential demergence being suggested by the step-function -- i.e., harmonic cluster mosaic in 11-dan glissandi (why 11? ask those superstrung-out on M-theoretical Musculpt symformphonie!) -- thematically embodied by macro-organization of the November-form of the piece. As regards the predilection for emergence over demergence (even in absence of a classical objective referential linear time, e.g., relative to the time problem in quantum-gravity: memetime-independent e[Xit}mergence seems to me to be hyperbole), there is an interesting passage in Edward Anderson's 2010 “Shape Space Methods for Quantum Cosmological Triangleland”, to wit, quoting the “Conclusion” section:

…the triangleland HO problem [HO = harmonic oscillator: a problem presented more technically in Anderson's “Triangleland. II. Quantum Mechanics of Pure Shape”, arXiv, 24 September 2009, a presentation which may be usefully compared to our, circa 1978, 3-fold topologically-active operator-time treatment of the quantum HO as instrumental in superconductance of hydrothermodynamic properties, which, in turn, may be usefully contextualized by Daniele Oriti's paper entitled “Hydrodynamics on (mini)superspace, or a non-linear extension of quantum cosmology”, arXiv, 19 March 2024, which also contextualizes our biological “non-linear extension”, circa 1980, of Schrödinger] has many mathematical parallels with the Stark effect [think: crossover topo-active optime] for the linear rigid rotor… However, in the latter, the electric field can point in any 3-d direction [think: null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian _µT_m-“skew-perpendicularity” as superordinating the Heisenberg ₁T₂-only-uncertainty relations], while in the former, the corresponding direction favoured by the potential cannot be rotated out of the collinearity plane. Moreover, the triangleland version has not 1 but 3 DM [the axis of magnetic flux produced by the field winding: think 3-fold temporal CURL] axes of particular physical significance within this plane (Fig 2b). Thus each of these problems is set in a different “multiverse” [in our hypercomplex-complex angular-momentum cascade notion, each of these LSTD, limited spacetime domain, “verses” is an expression of a given _µT_m-relative-state of identity-transparency, which is not identical -- heh-heh-heh! -- to the “relation” of “relational particle mechanics”]… Whether uniform states are probable… is of considerable interest in Quantum Cosmology… due to our actual universe being fairly uniform and expected to have emerged [this 'e'mergence considered in context of “hidden time {think: logically-ontologically-'before' Penrose-twistor-assisted quantization of 3-fold topo-active optime as 'de'mergence effectuator?} and emergent semiclassical time strategies for the Problem of Time”] from an extremely uniform state. Triangleland's most uniform states are equilateral triangles; the natural basis [“'natural bases' centred about the equilateral configurations”] new to this paper is then useful for studying propositions [be aware that these should be Gödel numerable] about these [equilateral-triangular uniform states used as part of “a back-cloth to read off which types of triangles are picked out by classical trajectories and by potentials and wavefunctions as height functions over the shape sphere”]…

Whereas, our approach to the problem of time in quantum-gravity (atmospherically speaking, i.e., Paine, D. A., and M. L. Kaplan, 1974: “The linking of multi-scaled energy sources leading to atmospheric development, the hydrodynamic spectrum”, Cornell University and Air Force global Weather Central, report for NSF Grant GA-35250, 140 pages: acoustically-modified gravity-wave-modes creation by tornadoes, this report cited in the “Edited Contract Reports” section of Kaplan's CV), sans the supposed “classical limit” (think: by virtue of, for two considerations, null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian “skew-perpendicularity” and scale-relative m-valued universal physical constants, e.g., absolute limiting velocities, accelerations, time rates of change of accelerations, _µT_mly processed by nature), is that of cyclotomic decomposition-demergence-cascade -- logical-ontological-existential -- by Pauli-Paine 3-fold topo-active optime execution of the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers “modes-and-nodes”-numbering the Regge latticing of _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m propositions functoring-functionaling-functioning the multi-sheeted Riemann-surface-like (i.e., not only the Riemann-sphere version, which is, in our scheme, the -- more's the pity -- ₁T₂-only simplest case) MVRS (m-logically-valued reference space) BackCloth universal covering of Musculpt manifold, M.

Yes, well, I have all along been fully aware that, of those few who have familiarized themselves, most have ridiculed the idea that superconductivity of atmospheric hydrothermodynamic properties -- whatever they might be! -- at tornadogenesis and of pi-electron parcels -- whatever they might be! -- of pi-electron gas at DNA helix-coil transition are, taken together, a case of self-similarity across scale levels -- and that both involve multivalued functions-functionals-functors (see the “Quantum Theory Under Non-Linear Reinterpretation for Biological Systems” section of our linked 1980 paper, wherein the “linear-time independence of state of a self-referential system undergoing self-reentrant autocatalysis” is characterized) _µT_mly processed. And, furthermore, that the topologically-active operator-time-executed and wave-effected information processing involved in each case can be heuristically modeled in what is now called “triangleland” (which we understood during the late-1970s into the early-'80s relative to scale-relative LSTDs, limited spacetime domains, and cortical modules), a notion employed in making approach to resolving the “time problem” in quantum-gravity. It is easier -- if at all permissible -- to see this relative to the generation-of-acoustically-modified-gravity-wave-modes atmospheric blackhole analogue than with regard to the DNA wave-emission of m-valued “overtone”-correlates to _µT_m-processed nucleotide-sequence codons. However, it is now much easier than it was in 1979 to entertain the DNA case, given the equilateral-triangular account of DNA computing provided in “DNA Tiles, Wang Tiles and Combinators”, Marco Bellia and M. Eugenia Occhiuto, Fundamenta Informaticae, 133:2-3, 1 April 2014. Moreover, I would suggest that the ₁T₂-only synthetic-qua-artificial DNA triple crossover complexes, described in “Construction, Analysis, Ligation, and Self-Assembly of DNA Triple Crossover Complexes”, Thomas H. LaBean, et al., Journal of the American Chemical Society, 122:9, 9 February 2000, are techno-ConveDDs, conversion-disorder displacements, of naturally occurring _µT_m-crossover-time ((re: Dirac transition snapover from the chaotic-bivalent 2^nk-random-walks emergence-notion of self-assembly [be aware that Stuart Kaufman's “nk-fitness landscape” notion was originally formulated, circa late-1980s, relative to DNA, and later generalized as a ₁T₂-only-logical chaos-complexity-theory take on _µT_m-logical processes] to the M^nk-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-relative-state-identity-transparency-as-quantum-potential demergence-notion of autopoiesis)) complexes effectuated, in response to environmental cuing and self-referential reentry at helix-coil transition, by 3-fold (i.e., three nested Dirac-crossover-time order-classes of self-organized-criticality-type transitions) Pauli-Paine hypercomplex-complex topologically-active operator-time.

I make note of the fact that (see the broad-sweep account provided in Section 2 of “Hydrodynamics on (mini)superspace, or a non-linear extension of quantum cosmology”, arXiv, 19 March 2024), in Daniele Oriti's hydrodynamical model of cosmology, functions are taken to functionals such that an objective referential-linear-time evolution emerges in this transition in conjunction with the appearance of diffeomorphism-invariant observables: i.e., ontological-to-existential emergence transpires in complexifying from function to functional, and in complexifying further from real to complex numberings. That scheme, IMHO, is the ₁T₂-only-logic take as tacitly referenced to the binary-mind's egosphere-ConveDDed-to-Riemannsphere, this quantum-unspeakables-I-&-II-ly bespoken ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, being deemed a “useful fiction” -- qua as cosmologically analogous to how condensed-matter physics (e.g., superfluidity, and, say, with regard to our take, superconductance of “hydrothermodynamic properties”) is understood as emergent out of particle-atomic physics à la individual-to-collective, discrete-to-continuous, micro-to-macro, beginning-to-end. The taking of functionals to functors -- second-order to third-order dynamics -- is not discussed. That absence (along with absence of m-valued logics and absence of the Hamiltonian constraint operator being replaced by Pauli-Paine 3-fold topologically-active operator-time: i.e., diffeomorphism-invariant nonlocal-to-local operators, the demergence cascade to locality, e.g., unto tornado touchdown, involving cyclotomic repeated instances of temporal CURL) is the main difference between Oriti's “classical-limit”-abiding, orientable, time-dependent, emergence-type -- function-to-functional -- hydrodynamical cosmology and our “classical-limit”-violating, non-orientable (beginningless and endless by virtue of the 3rd-order functorial level, a -less and -less transmogrified by the glutamatergically-etched, memetime-bound binary-mind into orientable), memetime-independent, demergence-[cut-twist-paste]-remergence, topo-active optime, hydrodynamically-inspired (following Maxwell, whose EM field equations were hydrodynamically inspired) toy theory of general “process” over differentiable Musculpt manifold, M. Ah, well, there's always “literally another question”! Ack, aye, being a Stowaway-Intra-Wold, [the}y of the binary-mind takes X[ta}see the supraegoic [hi}deus personas of demiurge to the power of N. Heh-heh-heh! says the 3-fold Hamiltonian constraint operator.

I am not a schooled person. However, in my youth I had some access to inner-Musculpt symformphonie, and prolonged privileged access to the knowledge base of an extremely well-schooled person, plus five years of five-days-a-week access to the Cornell library system largely free of prescriptive obligations. This access gave me a certain “edge” when it came to that which is schooled, but, nonetheless, in regards to the schooled, I've always been “behind the 8-ball” trying to weasel my way into the notations by pattern recognition through many repeated passes made over a long period of decades (the pattern recognition admittedly predisposed by embossed symformphonie leitmotifs raised up as molds for pressed-down cognitive imprinting -- uh, AFAIKWMI/i^mK, i.e., as far as I know what my I/i^m know; that is: what little my ₁T₂-only-knowing-I knows of what my _µT_m-knowing-I/i^m know). Adam Dukehart's December 2023 doctoral dissertation, “Aspects of Localizing Quantum Information in Diffeomorphism-Invariant Theories” is being helpful in regards to the effort at weaseling into (particularly so, since _µT_m-I/i^m-knowing reduced down to ₁T₂-only-knowing-I-type-knowledge is very likely one of the “Aspects of Localizing Quantum Information”). So, it now seems to me that the Dirac “dressing function” is a ₁T₂-only-take on null-vector-defined J.G.Bennettian _µT_m-“skew-perpendicularity”. Quoting Dukehart:

When acting on the vacuum, the dressed operator Psi(x) creates a particle with charge q and electromagnetic field response with support over all space, i.e., the operator is non-local but the resultant state is gauge-invariant. While the particle field operator is not an observable, the propagator… is an observable. Since the U(1) gauge allows for opposing charges, the observable can be a local object -- the non-local aspects of the field operators can be screened and inaccessible to an observer.

Inaccessible, IMHO, to the glutamate-etched, IBE-identified, ₁T₂-only non-participant observer distinguishing a simply-identifiable selfsame himherself as being absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct from a supposed simply-identifiable selfsame object. As regards “the dressed operator Psi(x) creates a particle with charge q”, I quote the “Multivaluedness, Self-reentry, Non-Orientability, and Hyparxis” section of our 1977 “general process” paper:

Returning now to Figure 9a, we see that as we consider an increasing number of LSTDs [limited spacetime domains], the skew-perpendicularity becomes more and more pronounced and, as a result of the combined effect of the negative and positive aspects of the temporal curl, a change of connectivity takes place. As all LSTDs are constantly undergoing skew-perpendicularity and the modification of lines of force inherent therein, it becomes apparent that charge is the direct result of skew-perpendicularity. Charge becomes the quantum effect of the macroscopic topological operations of the temporal curl on space (likely more precisely, a modular superspace). Moreover, when we go to the transfinite case, recognizing that the positive and negative aspects of the temporal curl transpire not sequentially but simultaneously, the two branches illustrated in Figure 9a become superposed, orientability is lost, and we are left with a primal singularity as portrayed in Figure 8b. The primal singularity is non-orientable and equivalent to a monopole. This formulation compares favorably with the Riemannian concept of charge as “lines of force trapped in the topology of space”.

Dukehart goes on to say:

…quantum models that include gravity must be able to handle principles from both QFT and GR. One such principle is the principle of general covariance, a key concept underlying gravitational physics. General covariance states that (A) everything is dynamic and (B) physics is the same in every reference frame. Mathematically, observables and states in any generally covariant framework are invariant under diffeomorphisms. Thus diffeomorphisms serve as the gauge group of gravity, meaning any physical observable in a “quantum + gravity” framework must be diffeomorphism invariant. However, difficulties arise when constructing local operators in diffeomorphism-invariant theories. Diffeomorphisms move points around arbitrarily [whatsoever kind of arbitrary in ₁T₂, there is some _µT_m where within that ₁T₂-arbitrary is not _µT_mly-arbitrary] and, as a result, the notion of locality cannot be defined since there is no “here” or “there.” [note the ₁T₂-only “or”; _CT_C+ly speaking, “here” is “there” by virtue of spatial identity-transparency: i.e., no information transport is involved; hence, superluminal velocities are not required] This means that the operators in such theories cannot have compact support, not only violating locality but also microcausality. Therefore, there is tension between locality and general covariance; operators that are local relative to a fixed background reference frame are not gauge invariant and gauge-invariant operators are non-local.

While the full theory of quantum gravity has yet to be discovered…

Speaking ₁T₂-only, “everything is nothing but changes” -- i.e., Heraclitus and general covariance (A). Whereas, _C+T_C+ly speaking, “nothing ever changes” (i.e., Parmenides). Parmenides is dressed down to Heraclitus by dropping logical-value order-types out of activated-states by memetime-independent topologically-active operator-time execution of enumerated-manifold-latticing Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbers of m-valued-logic propositions. As regards general covariance (B), I quote the “Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics of Complex Angular Momentum Cascade” section of our “general process” paper:

Depending upon the scale perspective adopted, we apprehend a given LSTD, a finite set of LSTDs, or a transfinite set of LSTDs. Therefore, it becomes apparent that any given process simultaneously manifests this threefold characteristic and can, therefore, only be adequately described with multivalued propositions.

Three questions immediately arise. How can we understand that a given process manifests a state to which the entropy principle is not applicable? How can any system, especially the system at the scale of the cosmological limit, be self-reentrant? In such a framework, what happens to the conservation of mass and energy? The first two questions will be considered in the next section within the context of multivaluedness. The probable answer to the question regarding conservation is more easily approached: m and E are conserved within a given LSTD; m' and E' are conserved within a finite set of LSTDs; m" and E" are conserved within a transfinite set of LSTDs.

In order to see that these questions should not be relegated solely to the domains of high energy physics and cosmology, we return to our consideration of the relativity of c, c', and c"…

Thereby, we suggest that physics is at least threefold-non-selfsame as regards conservation laws depending on the “reference frame” (not to mention the myriad orders-of-logical-value those three frames are simultaneously subject to). Starting with discrete objects and finding ways -- e.g., dressing up in the overcoat of this or that “persona” -- to account for nonlocality and entanglement is a logical march epiphenomenal to psychological identification with ₁T₂-only logic and its inherent prescriptions. The “dressing up” is done as a complexification regarded as the MO of emergence. Whereas, _µT_mly speaking, nature engages in “dressing-down” decomplexification, cyclotomic decomposition being the MO of demergence.

“There are no [₁T₂-only] physical laws in the world” Daniele Oriti, in “Hydrodynamics on (mini)superspace, or a non-linear extension of quantum cosmology”, arXiv, 19 March 2024, begins the presentation of a hydrodynamical model of cosmology with a series of problems to solve and questions to answer, to wit, quoting:

Cosmology has produced a basic working account (the ^CDM [lambda cold dark matter] model) of the cosmic history to an amazing level of detail, several theoretical models for its completion and improvements, and a large array of observations to test them. A number of outstanding challenges remain, though. They include the problem of the cosmological singularity at the beginning (?) of our cosmic history, the choice of initial state of the universe, which affects the later evolution, the problem of transplanckian modes of cosmological perturbations in the early universe, and the dark energy (or cosmological constant [i.e., lambda]) puzzle of the late (present) cosmological acceleration. Proposals of theoretical models solving one or more of these outstanding issues abound, but, in various ways, all need support or completion from a more fundamental theory of quantum gravity…

Models of the early universe are expected to provide an answer to two main questions: why do we have an approximately homogeneous, isotropic and flat universe? why an approximately scale invariant power spectrum for the cosmological perturbations?

A problem-question that, IMHO, subsumes those itemized by Oriti in “Hydrodynamics on (mini)superspace” is: How and why does glutamate-anchored-binary-mind cognizance find itself in the middle scale-levels protected by a “classical limit” and at the present-now “state-place” between past and future? Ptolemaic bivalently-logocentric geocentrism extended to chaotic-strange-attractored teleological anthropogenic-cum-anthropomorphic-ism? Is this how-why solved-answered by invocation of the Anthropic Principle? I imagine that, in the old-physics way, ignoring the quantum measurement problem in formulating a quantum-gravity GUTS was an aspect of the minimizing involved in (mini)superspace and of the toyfulness of a toy model. One bivalent-way to state this how-why is relative to introverted glutamate-anchored-binary-mind cognizance ₁T₂ly compacting memetime as it microscopically looks down the scale-level hierarchy and relative to extroverted glutamate-anchored-binary-mind cognizance ₁T₂ly memetime-lapsing as it macroscopically looks up the scale-level hierarchy. The Anthropic Principle almost-tacitly assumes that each universal physical constant must have, in any given “possible world”, a single selfsame numerical value -- not simultaneously scale-relative multiple values, ₁T₂ly-selfsame or _µT_mly-no. This almost-tacit assumption is, IMHO, epiphenomenal to exclusive employment of ₁T₂-only logic. The scale invariance of fractal objects is not incompatible with scale-relative, say, absolute limits like, say, absolute limiting velocities of LSTDs, limited spacetime domains (see hydrothermodynamic consequences of Earth's atmospheric value for absolute limiting velocity as depicted here and here). This compatibility would most certainly be the case were the multiple values of scale-relative absolutes m-logically-processed by nature. So, following Oriti, “Why an approximately scale invariant power spectrum for the cosmological perturbations?” Because the cosmological “objects” -- constellated by memetime-compaction-and-memetime-lapsing -- subject to the perturbations measured and registered by glutamate-anchored-binary-mind cognizance are also ₁T₂-only processed, their ₁T₃-unto-_µT_m-unto-_CT_C+ perturbational aspects being ignored by a supposed non-identity-transparent selfsame selfhood. While scale invariance does not prescribe fractal objects only, if fully-fractal objects are the case, then their “boundary” is without boundary and their “measure” is measureless -- i.e., perturbable in Penrose-diagrammable anti-de Sitter space with ₁T₂-only-universal covering and 45-degree null-geodesics and memetime-like geodesics (not a Regge-latticed C+ collection of _CT_C+-logical skew-perpendicular null-vector-defined _µT_m-logical-“pencils of skew-parallels”) insofar as bivalent-logic alone is employed in an attempt to demonstrate that the road to find out, uh, uh, the road to reality, has absence of _C+T_C+-relative-state identity-transparency over T_zog-chenAllBaseCommonGround of _CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly-multi-sheeted MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, BackCloth. Ditto for Oriti's question as to why “an approximately homogeneous, isotropic and flat universe”. Ditto for the primal singularity: on _C+T_C+-T_zog-chenAllBaseCommonGround there is no-beginning/no-end, no initial-state choices to be made (so as to be able to solve the equation sets), the transplanckian-modes problem ((a multivalued-acoustically-modified gravity-wave-mode-radiation [[once again I suggest to see: Paine, D. A., and M. L. Kaplan, 1974: “The linking of multi-scaled energy sources leading to atmospheric development, the hydrodynamic spectrum”, Cornell University and Air Force global Weather Central, report for NSF Grant GA-35250, 140 pages: the discussion of acoustically-modified gravity-wave-modes creation by tornadoes, even by cyclogenesis of lake-effect snow storms, and the pigeon-navigated [see here the original paper by Cornell's pigeon-lofters Mel Kreithen and Doug Quine] infrasound signaturing associated therewith, not only with respect to landforms and lake fetches, but also topological configurations of theta-e equivalent potential temperature surfaces, this report cited in the “Edited Contract Reports” section of Kaplan's CV]] problem integral to Paine-Kaplan cascade theory of tornadogenesis involving the temporal CURL aspect of Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time executed decomposition-demergence _CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly, the transplanckian grid-lengths and time-steps having to do with the C and the C+ of the involved m-valued logics, the divergences being the hypercomplex-to-hypercomplex-to-complex-angular-momentum-cascade whereswhensupons initializing cyclotomic onsets of 3-fold temporal CURL)) resolving to memetime-independent cyclotomic decomposition-demergence under 3-fold Pauli-Paine topo-active optime execution of non-selfsame Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, everything “dynamically” decomposed already all ways always “statically” being-there on _C+T_C+-AllBase. Moreover, contrary to the Francophone anti-Platonism argued in Stanislas Dehaene's The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics (Oxford U., 1996), the T_zog-chen take, IMHO, indicates that the IBEd-selfsame-self-identified-Intuitionist mathematician him-in-herself-her-in-himself animus-anima/anima-animus is nothing-but-nothing memetimelessly given demergent-shape by Pauli-Paine 3-fold [[including the lambda “puzzle of the late (present) cosmological acceleration” _CT_C+ly-unto-_µT_mly m-valued-lambda-contextualized by the effects of absolute limiting time rates of change of acceleration]] topo-active optime execution of the non-selfsame Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbers numbering the relative-states of identity-transparency qua quantum potential ensheaved upon the AllBaseCommonGround of MVRS ₁T₂ly-hence-memetime-boundedly-construed as the concessionary-qua-conc[or}dance (conc = [no}do in Japanese -- re: Taoist non-doing? heh-heh-heh!) single-valued-cosmological-constant-lambda-signified dark energy of the cosmic microwave background.

It may well be that the superconductant-pi-electron-gas frequency-response windows of histological types of DNA-RNA are super-thin (due to the superconductance: thus allowing quantum-based technologies that are not rooted upon dissimulated QM to be designed to stay out of biologically-active windows) and peppered across the microwave spectrum, and that this circumstance is a component of the so-regarded Anthropic Principle's strange-attractor-teleology with respect to the cosmic microwave background. Of course, I wouldn't construe the so-called strange-attractor-teleology in memetime-bound terms. I'd view the strange-attractor “pull” as manifest in topo-active-optime-effectuated demergence, _C+T_C+-unto-_µT_m, with the frequency-window component being encoded on _CT_C+-AllBase by Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of m-logically-valued propositions (actually, the “numbers” and the “wave-properties” being the same whatnots demergent as somewhats: we cannot specify, indeed even imagine, the nature of the “whatnots” so long as, absent techno-exteriorized inner-Musculpt as mathematical notation, our cognition remains ₁T₂-only). So, given that context of entertained belief, still, I have no bone to pick, and do not at all contest the mainstream academic historiographic treatment as to etiology, pathogenesis, onset and course of suicide, murder, serial murder, mass murder, mass-suicide, mass warfare, holocaust, genocide… hopefully this ellipsis is misused! -- though I regard that academic bivalent-logical, memetime-bound, psycho-sexo-socio-politico-econo-military notion of causality, in its many versions, as a purely surface-structure treatment. Deep-structure, at the lower terminus of _µT_m, incorporates cause-push into the _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m attractor-pull demergent teleology -- according to the schema I have come to embrace. Absent adequate address to the constellated deep-structure post-cum-pre-cipitants, no matter how thoroughly -- “thoroughly” being a rather implausible possibility, given existence of deep-structure attractors -- surface-structure vectors are rectified, the quantum-potential qua libido resident in regressed-archetypal collective-unconscious event-gradients will be sufficient to find a way around the rectification islands placed in the path of the psyche's night-sea-journey. Thematic recurrence -- in the abstract form, if not the concrete substance: therefore, no “exact recurrence” -- embedded in patterns of ponderablespacememetime-referenced events is thus guaranteed, and, at least in part, is explanatory of the apparent utility of memetime-bound cycle models (which are based upon analytic-outputs concerning surface-structure traffics). Even so, in academic accounts there often are hints as to deep-structure -- which are usually not much followed up (because the prevailing philosophical historiography is in denial as to actuality of such). We take Paul Preston's The Spanish Holocaust: Inquisition and Extermination in Twentieth-Century Spain, the 2013 Harper paperback edition, as an example. In “Part I: The Origins of Hatred and Violence”, after a brief introduction to evolution of the surface-structure causation, socio-politico-economic and military, on page 6 of the “Social War Begins, 1931-1933” section, the reader is told that:

After the dictator's departure in January of 1930, one of the first to take up the defense of establishment interests was Dr Jose Maria Albinana, an eccentric Valencian neurologist and frenetic admirer of Primo de Rivera [the departed dictator].

The author of more than twenty novels and books on neurasthenia, religion, the history and philosophy of medicine and Spanish politics, and a number of mildly imperialist works about Mexico, Albinana was convinced that there was a secret alliance working in foreign obscurity in order to destroy Spain.

This was a person who certainly knew something of European 19th-and-early-20th-centuries intellectual histories -- to include those of mathematics and the sciences -- such that he could very well have been back-reacting, unconsciously-subliminally-quasi-consciously, against aspects of that history considered anathema for undermining the traditional Weltanschauung-Lebenswelt-Umwelt fundamental assumptions without which the “establishment interests” he personally identified with could not long persist. So, the “foreign obscurity”, be it concretized -- by projective-identification à la Weltanschauung-Lebenswelt-Umwelt “obscurity” in habitus of his own cognitive processes, and ConveDDing, conversion-disorder displacing, à la the ideational threat converted into an existential threat posed, via displacement, by an external enemy -- to Jews, Masons, Soviets, was actually the corpus of unfamiliar notions appearing obscurely in his own conscious mind from the depths of the collective unconscious and readying itself for induction of a wholesale revamping vis-à-vis the institutional base rooted in the defunct worldview construct -- if not opposed (the new unfamiliar notions, themselves, independent of projections and ConveDDs, having been dissimulated from the get-go, e.g., N. H. Abel's 1823 existence proof for trans-al-jabr being immediately consensuated as an “Impossibility” theorem, and Schrödinger's 1925 m-valued statefunction being immediately interpreted to probabilities [i.e., BornRuled, 1926] instead of m-valued logics). Toward the end of his book, Preston, in the text given with a photograph of Antonio Vallejo-Najera, the head of Franco's psychiatric services, states that Vallejo “conducted experiments on prisoners to identify the 'red gene'.” The “red gene” notion -- a quintessential example of the ConveDD, meme-to-gene, as distinct from the ConveDD, gene-to-meme, uh, absent, that is, the idea that genes carry memes or that Gödel-numbered-Gödel-numbered simplices on Regge-latticed BackCloth carry inner-Musculpt leitmotivs qua memes -- is not mentioned in body of the text or in the notes, but clearly is another hint as to existence of the deep-structure aspects of historiography spurned by-- well, most all and most every.

Ohesayno de la Redonedo having gotten together with Sneakawholesalami of the Regulares Indigenas… Ah, hmmm. And, please, do ignore the revelatory pathognomy (not posted to Facebook). Thinking back, I have to credit, as regards my meeting the personal-action imperative, Paul Connell, Alaska sourdough extraordinaire (search here, circa 1960, for “Connell, Paul A”, listed relative to “gold lode development” and “Circle & Black dists. Fairbanks”: as a subcontractor, he worked for my father, summer of 1960, at Eielson AFB, thus funding his grubstake for that year), resident along the Yukon (what I knew: south of Circle about half way to Eagle, near what Paul called Post Office, a someplace defunct from gold rush days of yore), circa 1943-'63, before retiring to the Kentucky shores of Lake Cumberland, commissioned, so I was told, by Alaska Territorial Fish and Game Commission during the late-'50s to study wolfpack behaviors, strategies and tactics: his conversations with me, circa 1960-'61, contents of which predated Farley Mowat's observations, greatly influenced me, to the extent, I must admit, of imprinting -- despite the fact that my parents prevented my 17-year-old me from accompanying him on one of his yearly trips from reprovisioning back upriver to his Yukon mining-claim-homesteaded homesite (apparently left to me in his will!), which I knew, had I, would have fundamentally changed my life. Other than his wolfpack studies, this onetime Washington, D.C., landscape architect, who, fleeing Roosevelt and WWII, pulled a Gauguin in going off to the wilds of Alaska, spent his winters working on some higher mathematics theory of which I was aware but could not understand the gist of. Wolfpack-insights influenced or not, I've argued from MACV-J2 days that WWII resolved nothing etiologically fundamental, that it only drove the deep-structure pathofunctional vectors more deeply into the psycho-socio-cultural marrow, there to fester -- whence those vectors inevitably will reappear in much more regressed form, their phasic activation greatly elevated. While the pathofunctional vectors, being deep structure, are ontically non-viewable in surface-structure phenomenology, specifics of surface-structure phase shifts are indicative of the level of tonic activation and regression of deep-structure forcing functions -- or so I came to believe. Paul Preston's The Spanish Holocaust provides much that is illustrative of my phase-shift assertion. For a particularly pellucid example, I quote p. 17 of the 2013 Harper's paperback edition:

Right-wing hostility to the Republic was mobilized fully, with clerical support, in the wake of the parliamentary debate over the proposed Republican Constitution. The text separated Church and state and introduced civil marriage and divorce. It curtailed state support for the clergy and ended, on paper at least, the religious monopoly of education. The proposed reforms were denounced by the Catholic press and from pulpits as a Godless, tyrannical and atheistic attempt to destroy the family.

Contrast that relatively-mild WWII lead-in to the much more regressively activated and inflammatory operative surface-structure issues nowadays, all of which have to do with the, “evolved” since back then, infra-techno-[en}gendered, heh-heh-heh, Umwelt and Lebenswelt identity-qua-identity-discombobulation bleed-downs from the Weltanschauung dyscrasia unleashed by the dissembling of 19th-century higher mathematics and the dissimulations of 20th-century physics. Panopticoned SCSSed Bot&crypto-serviced GMOed Monsantoed BCIed LGBTQIA2S+ AI-dysemployed present-only-to-telepresence trivia-overloaded… Well, excuse my me! But, while I am, for the reason stated, interested in the sort of detailing so expertly and excellently provided by Preston -- I've been pretty resolutely reading about details of such anthropogenic horrors (the Murphy's-law epigram crossed into what-man-does-to-man-and-nature) ever since gaining access to the material located at AU's SORO, Special Operations Research Office, during Fall Semester of 1963 -- and think that accurate hisstorical cataloguing is important, still, I don't think it is all that important. Why? Analyses of dozens of upheavals were in-depth made at SORO, and during my two-plus years of access I read somewhat into quite a few of those analyses. By the time I quit college to go to the Viet Nam war I had already vaguely entertained, good offices of having studied C. G. Jung's Modern Man in Search of a Soul, the notion that psycho-sexo-socio-politico-econo-military detailings of the living-time involvements in those upheavals of personalities and movements and seemingly-coincidental events are characterizations of concretized themes and variations of recurrences somehow resident in the collective psyche Jung did so much of his very best to study. What I set myself on “the road to find out” about, by getting up close (re: Freud's, “Only first-hand experience can make understanding”), was what it is those recurrences are recurrences of. Whatever that is, so long as it continues to exist, if not this theme, then that theme, if not this variation, then that variation: the collective psyche will find one way or another, no matter what, given that the event sequences, whatsoever be their paths, are always and all ways “gravitating” (a non-Piagetian cum non-Euclidian cum Einsteinian GR update as to the Newtonian-analogical “drive activation”) upon that whatever, or those few whatevers (not sub-cathexes yoked in sYzYgY: conjunction more likely triangulated-YYY; opposed, obviously, by Ybarra). Adequately contextualized, it was not so strange for my me to have thought this way, to have decided that way. While I was early aware of Freud's superego-ego-id structurization and of “complex” as resultant of sexual repression -- hard to miss that growing up with 1950's Reader's Digest assiduously consumed by my mother -- I was jumped up over the hedge of all the concrete dizzyings that structurization elicited, jumped directly into the abstract facade (think: i-Msfp, inner-Musculpt symformphonie: eventually, circa 1973, which was before I read Emil Post on _µT_m-logics and after I read Jacques Hadamard's The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field which almost constitutes an Intro to Inner-Musculpt Symformphonie, I bought a copy and read Rapaport's analysis of the Euclidian invariants underpinning Piaget's characterization of cognitive development [nowadays understood to be glutamatergically anchored under orchestration by prescriptive enculturation-socialization beginning in the womb], feathering all of that into my attempt to grasp the semantic dimension of symformphonic “first-person thought” processes _µT_mly appearing to the “polysemous 'I'” [see Susanna Schellenberg's “The Polysemy of 'I'”, Mind & Language, 26 May 2025] long since denoted by my me as I/i^m, the _µT_m-quantum-relative-state condition of which I would not characterize with the word “anaphora”, as does Schellenberg, or even “exophora”, “[com}phora” being somewhat apropos of the involved identity-transparency) of “the structural theory” during the summer following my senior year of high school, circa 1963, by a tutored reading (or, most accurately, an attempt there to do) of Heinz Hartmann's Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation, David Rapaport, trans., International Universities Press, 1958, (re: Hartmann, think: “structure is function automatized” intercalated into the mathematical metasemantics of inner-Musculpt symformphonie, à la function spaces, those “bucket-of-warm-golden-dust” point-wise functions having to do with the m of I/i^m involved with, IMHO, convergence in non-uniform topologies) instigated by a life-long friend of my mother who was a clinical psychologist specialized in treatment of childhood schizophrenia. I've made note of this tutoring several times earlier in my postings, but haven't really explained the impact on a just-turned-18-year-old relative to a few months later being assigned by Abdul Aziz Said, in “Introduction to World Politics”, to assimilate an introductory to Jung's thought (whose idea of “the complex” as structural element of the psyche -- subsumed by the archetype-in-itself as another structural element -- was quite different from Freud's neurotic-Oh!-genesis concretion-expo of the concept: thanks be due to the encyclopedias in the AU library where late-nite nearby I met a MarjorieMorningstar-type who was deeply into the real nitty-gritty of Kabballah). Thinking of collective psychopathology, wherein the “that whatever” of the “recurrence” is sufficiently unconscious as to be discoverable only by first-hand experience is quite a strong impellation to get out of the academy and onto “the road to find out”: for me, a big clue came whilst briefly assigned to CICV-Targets. Even then, with only the beginnings of developing some insight, it seemed to me that it, the obvious collective psychopathology, had been going on so long, at such an unconscionable level of depth without overt indication of buoyancy, let alone of surfacing, that surely there could be no averting, though some alleviation seemed still to be possible. Much later, post my first reading of Post, obviously, and well along on “the road to find out”, the hypothesis arose that the “layered-transparent” metasemantic domain of i-Msfp is _µT_m-logical, that hypothesis being made because meanings of symformphonic geometrodynamics are delivered whole, from the “anterior sky”, [Abfall}ing

(quoting p. 61 of Martin Krahn's 2018 Duquesne University Ph.D. dissertation, entitled “Externality in Hegel's Philosophy of Nature”, whereupon Hegel is quoted as having written: “…how nature actually is, its being does not correspond to its concept; instead, the nature is the unresolved contradiction… Thus, nature has also been regarded as the Idea's refuse [Abfall] from itself, insofar as the idea as this shape of externality is inadequate to itself”; whereas I've chosen to understand “refuse” as ri-fyooz unto decomposition-cascade-demergence, rather than as mere ref-yoos)

through Les Fenetres as it were, only to, by Hegel's lights, be Auf[he}bunging an en-thuooz ₁T₄ly,

(quoting Ryan Krahn's 2014 University of Guelph Ph.D. dissertation entitled, “The Sublation of Dialectics: Hegel and the Logic of Aufhebung”, as regards “The Motor of the Logic: The Repetition of Aufhebung”, considering the repetition of 3-fold-temporal CURL instantiations, dot-exe initialized by Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time at relative-absolutes signified by appearances of divergences and convergences, to wit, p. 85, “…we described the manner in which Aufhebung functions as the logical operator of dialectics, the operant term of the Logic…” and from the condensed summarizing statement made in the Abstract, to wit, the “…chief contention is that this concept not be understood to function simply as a mere negation of negation, where that would mean an assimilatory determinate negation of a prior moment of abstract negation. Instead, it is argued that both abstract and determinate negation function at the level of sublation [both “preserved and changed”, e.g., in cyclotomic involutory decomposition] as such and that the concept should thereby be understood not only as a synthesis that combines a term with its antithesis, i.e., a unifying third term, but also as a fourth that treats these terms in their difference, holding them apart as oppositional. The quadruplicity of sublation here is discerned through analyses of the figure of servile self-consciousness in the Phenomenology of Spirit and…”; whereafter, it may be found interesting to compare the above-quoted to “The Mathematics of Aufhebung” as given in nLab, except that grokking the notation employed requires a lot of due diligence with the links provided)

inner-Musculpted thought process thus, _µT_mly according to our lights, not Hegel's, mimicking cosmogony, such that the egoic-first-person binary-mind can place no “handle” on the involved semiotics, the colored-sounded-form shape shifts clearly signifying meanings symbolically (as “signed by” Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers?) and unrelated to bivalent-geometry axioms, postulates, theorems, lemmas, corollaries -- that is, “no handle” absent access to inner-Musculpt holographically-exteriorized as mathematical notation. And I/i^m, “mine” and generic, heh-heh-heh, insists that “this”-Iambe parenthetically add that the “no-handle” condition pathofunctionally potentiates the un-understood (therefore not processable, not integrable) polysemous 'I', un-understood by the prescriptively-enculturated-socialized-&-glutamatergically-anchored “masses”, such that any chronic, say stress-induced, including from in-the-womb, radical deautomatizations of Umwelt introjections (from Lebenswelt and Weltanschauung) of identity-markers become schizophrenogenic (mind states influencing chemistry no less than chemistry influencing mind states -- bivalently speaking, of course), even becoming generative ancillary contributory factors to initialization of onset of this and that degenerative organic disease. Considering the logical-value-order-type difference between Hegel's “lights” and my own, I can pretty much concur with the macro-aspects of the differential diagnosis developed by dialectical materialism of the conditions induced by ₁T₂-only capitalism, but have no sympathy whatsoever with the associated portrait of etiology and pathogenesis, let alone with the prescribed treatment, both theoretical and as hisstorically applied.

“By convention”, yep. Ack, aye, what… is that? Resultant of orchestration by prescriptive enculturation-socialization of network-wipeout.edu glutamateric anchoring of “All and Everything” -- beginning in the womb -- to bivalent molecular-cellular brains at neuronal plasticity, thus kundabuffering-qua-preventing ((note the dysunderstandings of the authors of this linked paper: [1] kundabuffer is not kundalini, absolutely to the contrary; and [2] All and Everything, a comic-not-actually-cosmic dee-nope-uh…a-tation, is an “objectively-impartial”, heh-heh-heh, pejorative parody, ridicule-filled with all manner of “wise-acred” nose-thumbings at the “bon-ton-literary”-and-academic set, even as understood by knuckling-under Oh-Rage: if a personperdaughter has something fundamental to offer, heshe thereby knows enough such that heshe hides himherself as thoroughly as can be whilst accomplishing hisher briefing-assigned task given before the karmic lessonings imposed by the descent into hell, so as to minimize the destructive-to-all-involved transference dynamics as much as is possible, given the binary-logical-Anima/Animus STUuuFF inevitably elicited)) access to m-logically-valued quantum-brain processing (preventing, that is, by quantum quenching of intraneuronal-and-intra-perineural-DNA pi-electron-gas superconductivity? at temporal CURLed helix-coil transition)? Why the convention of four scenarios in multiple-scenarios strategic planning (that scenario deemed “most likely” being chosen for the basis of multiple-contingencies comprehensive planning of operations and logistics), such as are given in “Building Eurasia's New Fortress”, Sean Ring, DailyReckoning reposting to ZeroHedge, 2 August 2025? The 19th-century minds of our M&Ms -- Mahan and Mackinder -- were yoked to 17th-and-18th-century mindsets derivative of the Cartesian-Newtonian Weltanschauung, and nowadays the same mindsets are dressed in new clothes. So we have Gen. Alotta This and Dr. Alotta That calling upon Santa's claws to inpromaulgate gee-hooding of the scofflaws clearly gone querrilla. And quartandteening is our Gen. Tooice Tushqueettes, commander of outturnment camps for daseinners, enthusiasts for “laser Esperanto” and quantum autopoiesis like the quintanarchist, Mark de la Julie este Quim, camps like Dagator and The Cow. Yessiree, the most-likely infamous “Scenario C”: relatively benign under assumption that (1) a 4-square-cornered Samson complex will not express as the regressed-archetypal gradient it helped constellate; and (2) there has been no substantive advance in en[viron}mental warfare capacities over the last half century sufficient to make ICBMs outmoded such that a space-based robotic WWIII could transpire absent the alliance standoffs that likely otherwise would prevail. Yet, despite bunker-busters there are bunker-builders amongst the ultrarich -- apparently in anticipation of a great hunt-down or/and a nukeUlar holecaust. O, the temerity of Lotapie Ergun Paybil of Tar-on-the-Dutchy! Again, why the 4-convention? Because of the “preference function” selecting for the cross with its delineation of four quadrants. Even the Jungian psychological-types quadrature: the opposed functions of thinking-feeling+intuition-sensation. And most certainly this accustomed, rectilinear-graph-papered, foursquare gridding became tralatitious as an I-think-therefore-I-am hand-me-down cognitive cart from the so-called “Cart[is}i|on” coordinate system. Quoting the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as regards “so-called”:

…by 1628, Descartes had the fundamental insight that makes analytic geometry possible: the technique for describing lines of various sorts by using mathematical equations involving ratios between lengths in relation to coordinate lines. (Descartes did not require that the lines be perpendicular to one another.) Descartes himself did not foresee replacing geometrical constructions with algebraic formulas; rather, he viewed geometry as the basic mathematical science and he considered his algebraic techniques to provide an extension beyond compass-and-ruler constructions. When the right-angled coordinate system of algebraic geometry was subsequently developed, the name “Cartesian coordinates” honored Descartes' discovery.

So, mere “convention” -- or the nature of Nature? Maybe the nature of Mathematics -- as Plato [under}stood it? Why is the imaginary-number axis orthogonal to the real-number line on the complex plane? Is this orthogonality in the nature of the numbers, their are[i}the|metic(?) and al-jabr, something more fund[a}mental? Or[thou}gone|all = 90-degrees. Why four Or[thou}gone|alls to the whol[i}ness a circle metaphorically represents? [Multi}ply by the imaginary [i} and gone-all is, against all memetime, rotated counterclockwise by a 90-degree quarter turn. Ack, aye, so much elaborate has been the confusionism that Wright Ladygentski always is all ways regurgitating Oneismas Que Dos's ponderings upon the Kabbalah hidden in Ju das I_scari^ot memetime-[multi}plied over Hilbert's n-ensheaved I/i^m function space. Woe is my me! Where did 360 arc degrees to a circle come from (existence of the radians me[a}sure strongly suggests that other possibilities exist)? Pulled out of “the anterior sky, where Beauty flowers!”? That sky “anterior to the fall of the soul into the material world”, as suggested by Benichou and quoted by Mark Hewson in “The Mystery of the Moderns: The Historical Location of Mallarme's Poetics”, Affirmations of the Modern, 5:1, April 2017. In other words: the “Divagations” (“By 1868 Mallarme had come to the conclusion that, although nothing lies beyond reality, within this nothingness lie the essences of perfect forms. The poet's task is to perceive and crystallize these essences,” to quote Britannica) of equilateral-Triangleland's di-vagari, arc-degree wanderings apart? Diva[gat}i|ons? Artoo-Deetoo? Uh, that is: R²-D4, not D-2. Is no[thing}ness distinguishable from nothingness? Once again: what is aetiology of the whys given for the “intuition” of orthogonality (absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct independence qua individuality of statefunctions: no overlap or superposition [role superposition of state functionaries, nascently _µT_m-logical, experienced as ana[the}ma to the ₁T₂ly-prohomeostatic leadership hierarchy composed of “participation-mystique”-shunning box[m}en], let alone relative-state identity-transparency, i.e., the wavefunctions of “a particle in a box”, enboxing of the particle allowing ₁T₂ly-clear description of energy levels as [who}ally distinct) all but definitional of memetime-bound (definition of the instants of passing, passive, referential directed-yet-reversible timeline used at measurements requires orthogonality's absolutely-in-so-far-as-distinct independence qua individuality infinitesimally spaced infinitely close bases of the evolution function) unitarity's conservation of probabilities in BornRuled foundational conventions of consensus normotic quantum mechanics? The idea that aetiology and pathogenesis of the arc degree -- and all that followed from it -- was resident in ancient calendars (e.g., Persian and Babylonian) of 360 days/year is related to the controversy concerning, not the general catastrophism of Velikovsky's thesis, but the details of that thesis, such as, for instance, quoting “Velikovsky's Interpretation of the Evidence Offered by China in His Worlds in Collision”, Henrietta W. Lo, The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. 11, 1987:

Velikovsky also insists that between -1400 and -700 all peoples in the world adhered to a calendar that had 360 days a year, which was divided into 12 months of 30 days each. Later, he further professes that the belligerent Mars had caused Earth to shift her poles [not exactly what he argued], thus lengthening the year to 365.25 days. Oracle bone inscriptions have confirmed that the Chinese were aware, in the -13th century, that the sidereal year consisted of 365.25 solar days.

Indeed, then, deboxing the enboxing, is the complex plane somehow perpendicular to hypercomplex foliated representation spaces? No -- different notions involved, folks. Well, hmmm… Yo, bro', to where, then, does the Euclidian-perpendicularity qua quantum-orthogonality go? Hints are mounting! At absolute limiting values of memetime-referenced rates of change, it goes to curvature? At absolute limiting values of memetime-referenced accelerations, it goes to connectivities? At absolute limiting values of memetime rates of change of accelerations, it goes to nonorientabilities? General process, eh what. Mayhaps, as consider the “Conservative Mapping and the Curvature of a Surface” section of “Hyper-Complex Numbers in Physics”, Vlad L. Negulescu, International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 5:2, 2015, pp. 28-43. This hypering of flat complex plane as its curvature is under ₁T₂-only logic in infinite-dimensional Hilbert function-space where completion involves Cauchy sequences converging to a limit [think: infinitesimality of separation between instants of the evolution-function-referencing memetimeline]. Think, moreover, particle a box. But what if the limit in calculus is some finite value only under ₁T₂-only-logic alone? If, at limiting convergence-divergence there is a critical-state snapover in order-of-value of the logic, then closed-completion Gödel-wise slips out of the box into _µT_m-multiple-connectedness and laminated foliation-sheaves of Hilbert space go to spiral-form foliation, a la temporal CURL; and if _µT_m “itselves” isare a box-nesting analogous to a matrioshka brain, then slippings-out at 3rd-order absolute limits would take the stand-in notion of “null-vector-defined skew-perpendicularity” of “null-vector-defined pencils of skew-parallels” (think: metrical fibers cum topological fibers) into domains of _CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ nonorientabilities.

I am currently reading Paul Preston's The Spanish Holocaust (about which I knew virtually nothing prior to encountering this book) because of the massive parallels between runup to the Spanish-Civil-War prefiguration and aspects of the current asserted-to-be-runup-prefiguration conundrum (see, for two such assertion instances here [sorry, can't find this otherwise linked, so scroll down to the Scott Ritter interview] and here), planet Earth -- uh, on the Homo sapiens sapiens psycho-socio-politico-economic-military level, not, say, the solar-system scale level subject to the current recurrence of Velikovsky-thematics details cum ET Chariots-of-the-Gods spacecraft ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, à la C. G. Jung's assessment of UFO sightings. The “runup” issue takes me back to early-spring of 1967 and my assignment to Psychological Operations Group following my quitting SFTG (for having quit at the very end of Special Forces medic training, an attempt was made to get me assigned to the 173rd Abn Bde as a dust-off medic, but due to my period at AU-SIS and research done on historical precedents to, and socio-anthropological context of, the Strategic Hamlets Program, research largely conducted at SORO, Special Operations Research Office, I was, instead, made an intelligence analyst and given Psyops tasking as a teaching assistant mainly doing course-contents-related research). Upon arrival at Psyops Group, I was immediately enrolled in a U-of-NC 6-hr. graduate seminar on “Geography of S.E. Asia”, taught at the JFKSWCS, contents mostly directed to considerations involved with the Lower Mekong River Basin Development Project, and also into a series of lectures on Chinese concepts of warfare, the first lecture being on the notion of guanxi as an introduction to sociological contextualization. The Psyops tasking turned out to be minimal-to-nothing, though I occasionally stood-in as a substitute instructor, and my actual assignment became that to a small unit with office located right near to the library in the JFKSWCS building. This unit was supposed to be keeping current intelligence on ME, Middle East. However, nothing of the sort was actually being done. The commander in the office was a straight-leg Capt. who was rarely seen, assisted by a near-retirement Command Sgt. Major, a nisei Japanese whose whole career post-WWII had been as a CI agent working undercover throughout East Asia, and me, a private -- as well as about 200 El-Tees we never saw, who were twiddling their thumbs as they awaited specifics of their assignments to VN, the CSM handling all the admin stuff for these guys. So, learning what the actual job description for my-newly-assigned unit qua office was, intrepid me began to use the library and get the required distribution to develop “order of battle” current intel on ME. Well, at that point, I didn't know it really was OB, as I had yet to arrive at awareness that there was ongoing runup to the Six Day War. When the war broke out, all manner of high-ranking officers descended upon JFKSWCS seeking to be briefed. I was the only one there who was prepared to offer anything substantial, so the job fell to me. They were all embarrassed at being briefed by a private, so I was given two promotions in one day, then placed on a “Go Team” locked in a block house on Smoke Bomb Hill, from where, if the Israelis got into trouble, our small team would be immediately sent in, in some staffing role. Didn't happen, of course. During my so-called “OB” read-in, I developed assessments I did not publicly air (though I did have extensive personal discussions with the CSM): to include the notion that the plausibly-deniable oil policy aspect of Anglo (substantively beginning with pre-WWI formation of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company and onward, especially with the Balfour Declaration) and Anglo-American (think: overthrow of Mohammad Mosaddegh) resource warfare involved, from early on, conceiving of, and then actually using, Israel as a stick to keep the Arabs sufficiently wrought up as to make them easily controllable. I argued to the CSM that maintenance of this policy would require greater and greater infusions of massed violence to keep it on track over the long haul: his assessment of my personal assessment was non-committal. Since the summer of 1967 I've seen nothing suggesting modification of what I then believed to be the underlying plausibly-deniable oil policy aspect of the resource warfare Anglo-American enjoined in what may be understood as the global “strategic offensive” (a current incarnation of this thesis being put forth by the forecaster, Martin Armstrong -- who doesn't understand the war in Ukraine as being about Ukraine; onset of a war might be forecastable by cycle analysis of hisstorical recurrences, but certainly not onset of a nuclear holicaust-rapturing on the basis of recurrences). So, the current alt-media thesis (e.g., that version which is argued by Paul Craig Roberts, as seen, for three examples among many, here and here, and offering somewhat of a caveat here -- who, in arguing that Putin should have used S'n'A, shock & awe, to begin with, possibly hasn't adequately credited the possibility that Corncago “Nuclear Proliferation in the Middle East” neoCons, even-wolf-O-wizzingly-before the 5-billion$-overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych, have been incrementally accelerating -- jerk, jerk, jerk -- Everett-algo “escalation control options” in the attempt, from the beginning, to stampede the Russians into an act by which US'ins couldcan plausibly deny undertaker-responsibility for launching an initiatory strike, this PCR residue of faith in absence of determinate moral turpitude amongst bombing-survey promulgators being a faith quite possibly not altogether experientially justifiable to a high degree of confidence, certainly not as regards the risking of nuclear war, in the minds of each and every onetime targets analyst exposed to the presence of subliminally-vectored collective behaviors at dee-sidin' 'bouts carpet bombings, smart bombings, CBU seedings, willipeter pissings, napalm dumps…) that American foreign policy is suborned to aspirations of the secularized Elders of Zion for an Empire of Greater [Is}real, those aspirations having a p2p-Diaspora-distributed autopoietic (self-generating) Cabalistic engine modeled upon, uh, Three-is-my-me-Internal[i}on|al, i.e., an I/i^m|a}G^[i}nary twistover 3-fold temporal-CURL ConveDD of the Spanish-holocaust-era Troisieme Internationale, heh-heh-heh, is plausibly deniable by my me. Divergence free, this policy? Hmmm. Not when 3-fold-G^[i} is _µT_mly-factored into Einstein ₁T₂ly-tensored G_µv! by consideration being given to the “extra-combatant free-energy” available to internal-system-involved autopoietic processes. Resultant flame[boy}ansy of in[shrew}mental (Anima affect-charged by animus) policy imp|L[i}e|mentation (think: the always-with-the-spin Ebisu, that disrupting impish high-mesomorph-CEO-type-A godling who assaults the [strange attractor] self-organizing capacity of the [fractal drum] Empty Center, thus undermining systemic autopoiesis potential: as characterized in Hayao Kawai's “The Hidden Gods in Japanese Mythology”, Eranos Yearbook 1985, Vol. 54, 1986, a very important paper on archaic Japanese cosmography, showing its analogue to self-organizing “collective and cooperative quantum behaviors” nowhere to be found on the internet) not only putting linear momentum, L, into a rotational analogue, but placing the gravitational potential energy onto a negative gradient: à la a steepening of the ponderablespacememetime curvature, a shoot-up not a shoot-out, great-neck speed having been goose-necked, G_µvNⁿ. Heh-heh-heh!

Darren Taylor's “Africa Set To Test Critical-Minerals-Backed Currency” [note that these critical minerals are not stockpiled commodity “buffer stocks”; such stockpiling, given available discovery and RFID tech, no longer required; particularly in context of a reserve currency, vehicle or no, not being actually required], ZeroHedge reposting from The Epoch Times, 10 August 2025 ---- a set-to-test the “African Units of Account (AUA)” [hopefully not to suffer a fate similar to that of the Libyan Gold Dinar Plan] that is somewhat related to my thesis regarding a no-reserve-currency quantum-composite unit of account mapping to the MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, of the changing topologically-active-operator-time-formalized statefunctions of Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” ((see The Physics of Immortality, Frank J. Tipler, p. 172 and p. 267: in my reworking, a techno-regime-referential _µT_m-relative-state quantum-autopoiesis radical-upgrade on Hayek's “time-structure of capital”, an upgrade altogether unrelated to memetemporal business-cycle theory and Bohm-Bawerk's intraeconomy meme-intertemporalities discussed by Manoel Galdino here as scrolled down to)), planet Earth, as progressively made available via initializations of very-variously-commodity-backed _µT_m-LETS currencies ---- has prompted me to once again delve into the literature, beginning with a recent account of von Hayek's august proposal (see, relative to the “You do not currently have access to this article” original: “A Commodity Currency Reserve”, The Economic Journal, Volume 53, Issue 210-211, 1 June 1943, pp. 176-84: an unmentionable in his bio as given here and here) for a commodity reserve-currency, as essayed upon in “The commodity reserve currency chapter: Friedrich A. Hayek, John Maynard Keynes, and the International Monetary Order”, Keanu Telles, Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 4:3, July-September 2023. I got 3/4ths of the way through studying this and then they took full text of the paper down. Here is another possibility for the full text, which, I imagine, also may be deposted (I've found, over the years, beginning decades ago with books supposedly “missing in circulation” at the Library of Congress, that trying to access commentary on this general subject is a thankless task). No big loss, I guess. There appears little to be gained by attempting to address the points of argument made by Benjamin Graham (“buffer stocks” quite significantly glossed over -- indicating importance of the idea -- by WiKi's last paragraph, but glean a little here and here and here), Hayek, and Keynes, because as soon as _µT_m-valued-logics -- understood, not in the terms of truth-values, but of relative-states of identity-transparency -- enter the picture, thus invoking _µT_mly non-selfsame currencies-in-n-nesting-foams and [n-valued-prices} by virtue of quantum-superposed value ensheavements, transactions in which m-logically processed, the whole region of discourse is fundamentally altered, not least because a supposed objective, passing, passive, referential linear-time becomes mere memetime, no feedforward “real”, howsoever real-numbered, statistical, probabilistic, causal, attractor, pos-neg-feedback context for equilibration or cyclical or intertemporal-coordination analyses (undertaken to facilitate [₁T₂-only-price]-stability-targeting dot-guv interventions or to fulfill prerequisites to high levels of competence at catallaxy, or, more generally, self-organization). Ah, yes, ₁T₂ly-crowded into {ignore}antsy: normotic smart academic mob, or no -- heh-heh-heh! Aye, MoSoSo-mobbing of the wisdom of the “crowds within”: that'l do it! Solve all our problems, yep. The dissimulated-quantum-based-infratech dysanticipating-AI-assistant-assisted click-baiting search-engine algos and internet business model, plus photo and film fakery nowadays AI-assisted, have fomented and normalized a pandemic of deception-unto-outright-lying that has bled into virtually every aspect of human activity, thus not only severely undermining functionality of existing human systems but also making efficacious organizational phase transitions all but impossible. If not the “wisdom of the crowd” (see Charles-Marie Gustave Le Bon and Wilfred Trotter and Willam McDougall's 1920 The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology with Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character), then the wisdom of nature? How raw a version of nature is optimum upon which to analogically model human systems? At the rawest “level”, heh-heh-heh, nature has no scale levels -- IMHO, they only demerge from _C+T_C+-AllBase under topologically-active-operator-time-induced order-of-logical-value-cyclotomic _CT_C+ decomposition unto _µT_m. Nature, under demergence, has no preferred scale level, no “classical limit”. Chaos and noise are in the bivalent mind's eye! A system doesn't have to flutter its wings so as to visit a wealth of positions in state space in order to self-organize: given _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m, the whatsoever system is all ways always already in every position of state space -- however unresolvable by anti-animistic binary-mind “systematically”, heh-heh-heh, spurning _µT_m-states of “participation mystique” (therein linked as understood by George William Gilmore) and associated human-systems institutionalizations thereof. Don't believe in bottom-up-emergent autopoiesis as “nature's way” even if binary-mind dictated! Memetime-bound cycles are ₁T₂-demergents of _µT_m-relative-states “decoded” by 3-fold-topo-active-optime execution of p-adically-composed (see for edification: Matti Pitkanen's “Quantum Platonia and space-time surfaces as numbers”, 22 October 2024) Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, qua Alexander.Karpenko functors of Lukasiewicz logics over the primes, of the involved Regge-lattice-worked m-logically-valued propositions: this being a condition of the condition of the condition built into playout of the see[man}tick domain of symformphonie on Musculpt manifold, M. That -- that's, uh, the retrograde-inversion of THAT, uh, whoopse: on this level of understanding it's all non-orientable -- is what Plato meant by re[member}ing qua anamnesis! Platonia (unless Barbour's take on shape space changes his basic idea) is not probability-fog heaven wherein memory traces constellate passing-time as “crowds-within” [probe}ability waves: ₁T₂-intertemporalities are _µT_m-semantics, shape-shifts in symformphonie on Musculpt manifold, M. In my judgment, the SoWellian E-Con-O marketeering problem of “dispersed knowledge” has no actual solution given employment of ₁T₂-only-monies defined over ₁T₂-only-boundaries (no shape-space-shape-shifting quasi-fractal e-boundaries for LETS nesting-foams even being contemplated, the frozen binary-mind obviously requiring rigid boundaries as an ego-ideal) for ₁T₂-only-price-discovery: there being no actual “classical limit”, all of the non-removable _µT_m-relative-states-related information governing quantum-composite supersystem-system-subsystem behaviors is opaque to discrete bivalent micro-to-macro actors, such information in no way being incorporated into ₁T₂-only-priced-markette action directives. In the Keynes ICU (International Clearing Union) proposal white paper, IMF posted as linked above, the only definition of “bancor” given is:

…international bank-money, called (let us say) bancor, fixed (but not unalterably) in terms of gold and accepted as the equivalent of gold…

Set this white paper next to that of Satoshi Nakamoto. Which is more sophisticated? The Keynes-proposed employment is much more that of a unit of account than of that of a reserve currency (particularly so as of a vehicle-reserve currency). That being the case, Keynes did not see the necessity of a reserve currency, only of a unit of account and a central -- that is: one and one only for the whole planet -- ICU apparently to be operated by a transnational bureaucratic entity. But, just as stockpiled buffer stocks are no longer required for very-varied-commodification of _µT_m-LETS-nesting-foam currencies, with distributed-ledger technology on MVRS, m-logically-valued reference space, no ICU would be required. Seed idea! Doesn't make much sense in terms of ₁T₂-only-Everettian relative-states where the splitting-off-schizo-emergent memetime-bound individual universes-worlds-regimes are kept incommunicado by diktats of plain o' linear-time or, more elaborately, by “thermodynamic-time” determinations. This _µT_m-monetary-theory notion needs rigorous development by evolution-through-use of techno-exteriorized inner-Musculpt-as-mathematical-notation employed as user-friendly interface to _µT_m-LETS transactions slowly trial-and-error brought up such that the binary-mind has a practical domain and a vehicle through which, by daily practice, to become able (once again? by re-accessing the quantum-brain's states of “participation mystique”) to think in _µT_m rather than ₁T₂ly-about _µT_m. However -- given this, a very big “however” -- nowadays, there appears to be many variants, indeed “mutant strains”, to the pandemic collective psychosis, detailed symptomatology varying from one strain to the next. The two symptoms, that have become diagnostic of the collective formation currently being shared by all pedigrees, are: [1] inflationary identification of raddled egofunction with pearlescent superego, a psychoneuro-econophysics ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of commitment to the inflation “solution” to long-term cognitive deficits mega-indebted, substitute memories filling the distributed ledger CPAing devolution of Platonia to memetime; and [2] tacit embrace of the crystalized-out plausibly-deniable grand strategy (this embrace being a subliminal “rationalization” of altogether unconscious “tethering” to the regressed-archetypal self-metaprogrammed Homo sapiens sapiens suicide-pact-constellated collective-unconscious event-gradient glutamatergically anchored during the his[try}on|i|c period of 19th-century Rooo[mantic}ism, near-universalized during the 20th and 21st centuries by employment of dissimulated-quantum-based infratech to facilitate imposition of global monoculture) a strategy finalizing as to involve mass population reduction, get whilst the gettin's good, move off-planet when there's little left to loot, turn Earth into a CEO-safari park. Pretty darned easy to view A. Einstein, et al., as having done something destructive, not something creative. Preorganic… helped along by discovered-this/discovered-that to en[viron}mental-injections-induction of adjunctive components to organic impairments of ₁T₂-only-molecular-cellular brains. Soft clarts, what! Yep, hept along to the current monist throwback to the monochrist fasciitis-bent hordes, a Doofuss-type hoard regime run by H'il Robem, assisted by Large-o Lottareda. I'm not seeing fibrosis bundles of skew-parallels between runup to the Spanish Civil War and close approach to socialism in any one country. Nope. The regressed-archetypal event gradient has gone Beyond Borders onto noosphere covering surface of spaceship Whole Earth, imagined mono-solution to all and everything raddling -- not just those addlers construed existential threats -- near-universally being a We-Are-The-World centralization in the ₁T₂-only-pyramided-dot-G_µv-fiat exercise of coercion.

Think implicate: the bivalent implications of ₁T₂-only-pyramided-dot-G_µv-fiat exercise of-- G_osh, the Gravitational Origins of S_(patium)-all and H_(amiltonian)-everything. Yeah? Well, given that they've pattered with every lurch, what can be the expectation value except bounce and creak? Clatter-clatter, uh, chatter: fo'sure, that's what! Julian Barbour has done better, but, like on Roger Penrose's Road, that most-fundamental which is missing from his, B's, take on Mach's Principle of the universal relativity of inertial motion ((my first awareness of this Principle came during Fall of 1975 reading MTW's Gravitation, during the period of which I also first read Emil Post's 1921 paper on _µT_m-valued logics)) is that Machian-relativity is, indubitably is, _µT_m-relative-state (_µT_m understood -- the notion truth-value confined to the ₁T₂-only logical-value order-type [e.g., EWGed “it from bit” and Barboured “bit from it” Wignerian breaking of the memetime-stamped blockchain] of _µT_m -- in the terms of identity-transparency, _µT_m being demergent of _CT_C+ which is demergent of _C+T_C+). The second-fundament that is Barbour-missing is realization that scale-relativity is, indubitably is, scale-invariance, (involutory) cyclotomic DECOMPOSITION of the former from the latter -- that is: the laddering of the latter -- is executed by Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time initializations of the Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers numbering (for the anterior-sky's imperative to “Number the numbering!”, see the last portion of Vol. 2 of our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh) propositional-configurations of shape-space-Platonia MVRS BackCloth, which m-logically-valued-reference-space is universally covered by _C+T_C+-AllBase of Musculpt manifold, M, the “involutory”-self-cancelling explaining the beginningless-endless static-allness of _C+T_C+. Barbour began with The End of Time, time being “nothing but very well founded illusions”, i.e., glutamaterically-anchored memetime, and has phase-transitioned to time's arrow having gravitational origins, hence being no actual illusion. So, where does topo-active optime come from? Uh, à la “Wigner's Friend” (“Want to read more?” is the “ask” on this link: Nope, not my me, heh-heh-heh, for, despite itstheir ID-transparency, why should my I/i^m Friends -- singular is plural -- want[s] to be more ₁T₂-thoroughly thought-tracked than theyit already isare, given the deteriorating condition of the so[c}i|us?), in regards to a temporal CURL-related experiment -- Wigner-on-AllBase, Friend(s)-on-MVRS-BackCloth: thus, the answer given will necessarily be expressed in ₁T₂-only-Speak -- universal consciousness in its active aspect is the set of all topological operations on _C+T_C+-AllBase; universal consciousness in its passive aspect is the AllBase acted upon. More fundamentally, à la the last two sentences of Post's 1921 paper, we can't possibly know “where” topo-active optime act[u}all|y, heh-heh-heh, “comes” from until we (once again? via techno-exteriorized-inner-Musculpt-symformphonie-as-mathematical-notation-assisted re-assimilation of states of “participation mystique”) learn to think in _µT_m rather than ₁T₂ly-about _µT_m.

The term “intersubjectively verified”, if I properly understand its pedestrian use in physics relative to “external observers” like Wigner's Friends, involves assumption of bivalently-simple-selfsame identity of the intrasubjective and its external([i}-“zed”) complexless dis-ket and bra-less observer(s) protected by the supposed “classical limit” -- self-observed or/and hetero-observed. To my me, however, intersubjectivity is a transmission-independent braⁿ-ketⁿ matter of I/i^m identity-transparency _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+. I/i^m is opaque to most all physicists because -- since a ket has a vector representing a state -- QM has to struggle mightily, and has so far altogether failed, to go BEYOND the ₁T₂-only-in-or-out-BORDERS of abject reductionism to get into the glob|all[i}tye intuited by the last two sentences of Post's 1921 paper on _µT_m-valued logics. This indicated general area of discourse is ₁T₂ly-explored in detail by Caroline L. Jones and Markus P. Muller in “On the significance of Wigner's Friend in contexts beyond quantum foundations”, arXiv, 20 January 2025. Quoting from the summary Abstract:

We argue that the gist of the Wigner's Friend paradox can be reproduced without assuming quantum physics, and that it underlies a much broader class of enigmas in the foundations of physics and philosophy… Then, we argue…that a physical theory cannot give us a probabilistic description of the observations of all agents… Our analysis suggests that Wigner's Friend should be studied in a larger context, addressing a frontier of human knowledge beyond quantum foundations: to obtain reliable predictions for experiments in which these predictions can be privately but not intersubjectively verified.

The final sentence, the last of their Abstract, suggests to me a this-“I”-or-that-“I” take on the Lockwoodian compound-“I” (note that the multimind interps continue to be memetime&probability-bound) take on the multi-worlds interpretation of the Everettian ₁T₂-only-relative-state formulation of, essentially, Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction. As regards JonesMuller's “…much broader class of enigmas in the foundations of…”, we must ask about psycho-dependency to understand the involved clinging behaviors, e.g., dependency upon psychological types (not to exclude somatics: physical and temperamental types, and institutional-recruitment preference-functions there for). Though I fail to see objective tests of conscious preference functions cum self-assessments as revealing much concerning unconscious vectoring by largely-in-denial imbalance of psychological functions (and consequent syzygy to transference dynamics), à la, for instance, “The psychology of philosophy: Associating philosophical views with psychological traits in professional philosophers”, David Bryce Yaden and Derek Anderson, Philosophical Psychology, April 2021, which found “…limited to no support for the notion that personality or demographics predict philosophical views” (prominently missing from the References section is Newton P. Stallknecht's and Robert S. Brumbaugh's The Compass of Philosophy complexed into C. G. Jung's Psychological Types). Well, hmmm-- apparently progenitors of Jose Maria Cid y Anima-Animus explicitly understood, and so stated, the contrasexual 2-state quantum-superposition long before C. G. Jung began his classically-limited investigations into the stealth dynamics of the transference phenomenologies of the psyche, individual and collective. Some regard the individual dynamics as skunk works; others, the collective dynamics as pork[e}pine quills. Per[son}all|y, I didn't get much non-classical understanding of the involved phenomenologies until long after assimilating the hexagonal-qua-equilateral-triangular “Eight-Fold Way” of Jung's Psychological Types [1921] (thinking-feeling/intuition-sensation, as introverted-extroverted) placed by drive-activated affect-charge in A/A-superposition within The Psychology of the Transference [too late: 1946] as collectively transferred via projective-identification at ConveDDing (conversion-disorder displacing) to the “elementary particle zoo” as THE (probably-waving) WAY to escape [Born: 1926] the _µT_m-logically-valued [Post: 1921] interpretation of Schrödinger's identity-transparency-induced menage-a-trois Tantrically-generated [1925] m-valued statefunction. Having seen this [Cornell: 1975], I altogether lost interest in politics and economics; making a cursory survey ((nothing so comprehensive as this; note here how every eco[no}my-type discussed is done so by assumption of ₁T₂-only-logic-alone as being operative, insofar as logic was at all attributed; this assumption -- of binary-minded exclusively-in-the-body-identified humans -- being tacitly so held even of the characterizations of prehisstoric cases)), I asserted to myself that there never has been in human hisstory a political economy I could have believed in: that being the case, how so very much hubris must my “I” have to entertain that my efforts could possibly be more effective than all the efforts made over many, many millennia. Anyway, I saw no indication of _µT_m-holo-autopoiarchy cum _µT_m-holo-autopoionomy anywhere in the works. So, as Doug Paine had it, I set about describing (see Vol. 2 of our novel The Moon of Hoa Binh) an imagined “viable path not taken”.

Frankly, pretty much lifelong, I have cared less -- far less than do most. All utilities, material and non-material, are drugs of a sort in that they are subject to habituation behaviors, e.g., an increase in material advantage only increases quality of consciousness-state momentarily until habituation to the new level sets in, returning state to status quo ante, thus requiring acquisition of yet another advantage, and so on and so on. Once the basic creature comforts are reliably available, if the habituation-behavior path is entered upon… Tie this psychosomatic reality to cognizance of involutory-hologrammic self-canceling of the cosmic nesting-foam framework condition -- if you want to live comfortably in the quantum world (subject of a book Doug Paine was working on when he went into premature demise). Why is inner-Musculpt mostly unconscious, only occasionally and weakly wending through by good offices “of… what”? When, I first asked that question, is lost to the mists of memetime, even if the memory trace thereof be stored in Platonia. What I do know: some memetime during my early teens. “Why” is the unconscious unconscious? The subliminal mind. The personal unconscious. The impersonal collective unconscious of the population corpus. First hints as to possible answers to these “of… what” and “why” questions came to my me as a Fairborn H.S. highschooler sitting, circa 1963, in a Wright-Patterson AFSC, Air Force Systems Command, flight simulator used in development of digital-autopilot technology. Though it was never stated in so many words, this flight-simulator opportunity was arranged for me with involved scientists at our Sunday brunch dinner table as part of the induction funnel to following in my father's air-metaled wingspread by becoming a USAF pilot. Or so I believed. Asked if I wanted to go to the Air Force Academy, I declined -- but did “win” a national Navy ROTC scholarship, with post-commissioning naval-aviator component, to U of VA. However, I flunked the physical due to 20/25 vision in my left eye (20/15 in my right eye) likely acquired from snow blindness suffered whilst stalking caribou out from Alaska's Denali Highway, circa 1961. That case of snow blindness possibly saved me from being shot down over North Vietnam ((one of my Eielson, AFB H.S.-basketball teammates, as navigator of an F105F -- flying a SEAD, suppression of enemy air defenses, mission -- took fire over North Vietnam, fire which put the pilot out of commission, and managed to get the wounded aircraft back to base: always was a clutch player, was he; and one of the two fellows with whom I took tutored independent math studies we had been stimulated to request by watching U-2s roar off near vertically and glide in on hawkish whistles through Eielson ice fog; the three of us also scrimmaging basketball with U-2 and SAC pilots at the base gym, circa 1960-2, an eventful period)). Sitting in the Wright-Pat flight simulator, I was acutely aware of the information-overload theory as to etiology of pilot-fixation-syndrome tunnel vision (similar, I supposed, to the tunneling I knew so well from my “Plexiglas-wall” derealization-interludes analogue to the digitalized “glass cockpit” then being simulated). A situational-awareness-type of unconsciousness “localized” (at that memetime, circa early-spring of 1963, I was taking honors PSSC physics, the 1960 text, which included a teacher-instigated experimental H.S. intro to some basic ideas of QM) to the subliminal mind? The unconscious is unconscious due to information overload? While the overload -- dial readings, “weather updates, navigation data, route changes, warning messages, and air traffic control communications”, et cetera, not to mention the high-stress complexities of air combat -- does not much involve visual-picture presentations or radar-camera images, still the latter is… Hmmm. Radar-camera images and inner-Musculpt sounded-forms. I wonder… During my brief period as a CICV-Targets analyst, circa 1968, I learned a bit about superimpositioning-overlaying 2D data in 3D stereographic imaging qua photogrammetric stereoscopy (weak analogy to the Husserliana of Analytical-Cubistic n-viewing-points faceting of “horizon” to localized decoherent object). Soon thereafter, having weaseled my way into SRA/MACV-J2, I worked in the MACV-HQ building which was located directly across the road from an Elint unit that employed 3-points in RDF, radio direction finding, as well as much else, radars among: shooting the bull with members of that unit at the VNAF Club down the road near Ton Son Nhut's main gate, I learned a bit about triangulation. People have pejoratively stigmatized my regressed-archetypal-event-gradient ideas about etiology, pathogenesis, persistence, and course of collective psychosis as being a notion of (1) unconscious conspiracy, and (2) cognitive-stealth technology. I regard the second of these as being a subliminal recognition of considerable import. Nowadays, the terms “triangleland” and “backcloth” are used. Back in my Cornell days, beginning the summer of 1975, I called triangleland's backcloth the MVRS, “multivalued reference space”, meaning -- as in conversations I later learned to more specifically state -- “m-logically-valued reference space”. I imagined this, initially, by Cabalistically going from the 6-pointed David's-Shield's qua Seal-of-Solomon's superimposed-opposed ((think: symbolically indicative of a trumping of the mystic's “no-self” simultaneous [de}volution-[re}volution hologrammic cancellation unto superordinate dissolution of the “cosmic nesting-foam framework condition” into the F.S.C.Northrop “undifferentiated aesthetic continuum”: Bernadette Roberts was brought to my attention by CM's David Spillane, an old friend of Michele Fernan)) triangles (good offices of that Marjorie Morningstar in the AU library, circa 1963) as further signifying cascade/reverse-cascade (good offices, circa 1975, of Paine-Kaplan tornadogenesis numerical modeling) fromto the most-densely-packed T_zog-chenAllBase (an idea catalyzed via good offices of Ruth Rhoad) sheet (bucket of packed warm-golden-dust-mote points numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers) of MVRS as an equilateral-triangular-meshworked nesting-foam, scale-level decomposable. Think: a caustic = a focal-qua-JaneRoberts-(she was in Elmira, my “I” too often at Zorba's in [I}thaca: during a lengthy telephone call she told me not to come for a visit, which was not the case for Beverly Oliphant, M.D.: Deirdre alerted me to presence of Jane)-coordination-point swarm of Penrose-twistorized temporal-CURL-rotated flying saucers, heh-heh-heh! AllBase as somehow analogous to a superconducting mirror (Native American “Mirror-that-Smokes”, as I then, my Cornell days, filched the notion), a perfect EM-conducting plane (see: “High-Frequency Expression For the Field in the Caustic Region of a PEMC [perfect electro-magnetic conductor] Gregorian System Using Maslov's Method”, M. A. Fiaz, et al., Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 81, pp. 135-148, 2008), a perfect multi-layer reflector (see: “Internal mechanism of perfect-reflector-backed dielectric gratings to achieve high diffraction efficiency”, Lifeng Li, EPJ Web of Conferences, 04022 [2023]), a Mach-principled-whole-holed black-bodied cosmologos. Distribution of wavelengths perfectly matches that of a blackbody at 2.725 kelvin CMB, cosmic microwave background, considered the afterglow of a supposed swing-[men}acing BigBand (circa early-1930s), uh, uh BigBang (circa early-1930s). That being the memetime-bound ₁T₂-only view of the roles played by “Ray and Caustic Asymptotics for Edge Diffracted Waves”. DAAAH Dah-Dah daaaaah! Fate aknocking?

The state of any any-one-thing is relative to the state of All-every-thing: relative-state as a premise in set theory. TimeWaste is needed to stack, to superpose that is, the all points-of-view required to constitute any any-one-thing. Hence, the timelessness invoked by haiku, by play-verse evocation of the essence of any-particular-occasion (once cultivated by hokku-haikai in ritualized social diversion-flirtation as cosmological metaphor 575-77-575-77-575-77-575-77-575-77-575-77-575-77 forever).

What do the _µT_m-logically-valued propositions say that the G-numbered G numbers number? Think: structural scale-invariance (size of the nesting-foam triangles doesn't matter to material matters) over decomposition involutes subject to Mach-principled systems-wise scale-relative absolute-limiting values of dynamical variables homomorphic to values of m-valued universal physical constants _µT_mly processed. Think, moreover, of the m-valued acoustically-modified-gravity-wave-modes signature of the theta-e equivalent-potential-temperature surface (in its asymptotic sounded-form triangulation). And thence to radar-camera images as analogues to inner-Musculpt sounded-forms being somewhats constellated within the MVRS. Hmmm. So, why are these triangulation-identifiable sounded-forms largely confined to the unconscious, individual and collective? Maxwell's frequency-window-opening-and-closing “angel” as an angle on temporal CURL must surely be hiding in there somewhere as part of the answer. How back-scatter-independent is the bottle-nosed dolphin's sonic-visioning? Put a ₁T₂-logical stealthy back-scatter-proof sounded-form in _µT_m-logical state space cum configuration space cum co-tangent-bundle of config space qua phase space cum shape space and how much… How much “imaginary” conscious awareness does the bottle-nosed-dolphin's _µT_m-quantum brain have as to existence of the ₁T₂-stealthy-triangulated sounded-forms of the collective unconscious, human and non-human? Not to mention the regressed-archetypal event-gradient as a GR, General Relativity, representation of the “movement” of those stealth-triangulated sounded-forms. How much can the binary-mind know? How much, indeed, is the CrownJewel's military stealth technology a ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of the diamond-cut (thanks be due to CM's Roger, jewel cutter par excellence) cognitive-stealth constellated in the collective unconscious as inner-Musculpt _µT_m-symformphonie -- this binary-minded ConveDD into military app being a symptom of the persistent collective psychosis plaguing horse-domesticating-cum-matrisystem-quenching Homo sapiens sapiens in episodic saddle-back fulminations?

“Raaain-drops keep fallinnn' on my head”… Ack, aye, “The rain in Spain stays mainly on the planes”… which panelling operators demerge from T_zog-chenAllBaseCommonGround. The right stuff, once again alerted to my me by a heads-up from Lauri Love: “A Hyper-Catalan Series Solution to Polynomial Equations, and the Geode”, N. J. Wildberger and Dean Rubine, The American Mathematical Monthly, 132:5, 8 April 2025; a short introduction provided here. This is a fascinating Catalan-number paper leading me into awareness of Catalan's triangle (the involved string-partitions mapping being of Musculpt interest) and, via the layering issue, of the Tower of Hanoi, and of the con[text}free|ness ("[" S "]")* cum con[text}sen[sit}I/i^m've|ness {a^p :p is prime} of Dyck l{ang[le]u}ages. Much comes to mind. Most enlightening is Theorem 12, as regards face-layering: the sum, S₁, is not a power series (factor values jump up and back down and up…), hence not automatically invertible (((undermining the notion of INVOLUTORY cyclotomic [de}composition-[re}composition of T_zog-chenAllBase relative to t₂,t₃,t₄,…,t_n factors of subdigons s₁,s₂,s₃,…,s_k-ary sequences of ₁T₂-only-logically-selfsame numbers taken as numbering whatnots-unto-somewhats cum somewhats-unto-whatnots demergent-remergent under executions executed by, say, k-ary panelling (think: LSTDs, i.e., limited spacetime domains, as type-m = [m₂,m₃,m₄,…] “panels” unto polytopes) operators qua Pauli-Paine 3-fold topo-active operator-time unto 1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-order spacetime del operators as set-theoretically exemplifying the con[text}sen[sit}I/i^m've|ness (think: e.g., order-types of conservation laws) ₁T₂ly characterized here relative to temporal CURL cum temporal counterCURL; is the involved contrapose currently being ConveDDed, conversion-disorder displaced, due to denial of this, which denial of the predicated m-level encipherment facilitates permissivity sufficient to allowance of the “creation” of such like as this?))); this is nontrivial. Note that expansion of OEIS (the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences) “would then [expanded to include an aleph-null-infinity number of cases] need to use a Gödel numbering storage addressing scheme” involving, at the very least, employment of {a^p :p is prime}. What happens to the triangle A-numbers under Geode-numbering of Geode numbers, à la Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of _µT_m-logic order-types of somewhats unto whatnots? Is there some sort (think: Maxwell's “angel”) of correspondence between Ge-numbered Ge numbers and Gö-numbered Gö numbers? Would Lukasiewiczian analog computer processing ease the Ge-number computation difficulty? The last sentence of the Abstract to “Hyper-Catalan and Geode Recurrences and Three Conjectures of Wildberger”, Dean Rubine, arXiv, 6 July 2025, states that:

While the recurrence allows us to expand each Geode coefficient as an integer combination of hyper-Catalans, enabling calculation, a closed-form for the general Geode coefficient remains unknown, as does what it counts.

I would humbly suggest the possibility that a closed-form for the general Geode coefficient does not exist and that what the Geode-coefficient factors count are the logical-value order-type factors of the layered nesting-foam of _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ logics overriding the general multivariate polynomial equation of the [de}mergent forms of THE [re}mergent form (see Section 10 of our paper linked here) cyclotomically decomposing to Musculpt symformphonie. Here the C-subscript indicates the Cantorian continuum (not Catalan, and not the complex and hypercomplex variables included in the collection denoted by m). I am aware that Wildberger rejects the foundations of analysis in challenging the notion of an infinite set (see here and here and here) by feeling that there is a logical malaprop involved in the “there exists” aspect of the involved axiomatics (see p. 668, Vol. 2, of our 1994 novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh). I sympathize with this position in a certain manner because I dropped Calculus I at George Mason U. in 1974 when told not to ask fundamental questions which disrupt presentation of class materials. Specifically, I thought that the idea of a limit was somehow logically malaprop. Later, in Cornell's math library, circa 1975, after reading Emil Post on _µT_m-valued logics, I supposed that “in the limit” of infinite or infinitesimal divergence “there exists” a logical-value order-type transition (logical-value understood, except in the ₁T₂-limiting-case, not relative to truth-value but to relative-states, ₁T₃,₂T₃,₃T₃,₁T₄,…,_µT_m, and beyond, of identity-transparency qua non-selfsameness, which, IMHO, is not a matter of quasi-set inclusion functions).

Oh, I see. There is that: the idea that the collective unconscious does not have a sense of hu-hu-[hu}mor, and that the notion of a Trickster archetype, in particular, is a great stretch. Not to mention the idea, cultivated by those who have not read Freud, let alone Jung, that the very idea of an unconscious, especially a collective unconscious, does not meet Popperian demarcation via falsifiability testing such that it crosses the bivalent-either/or line into science qua-set membership by demonstrated experimental observability. Ah, well-- hmmm. Here, following, as we are wont to go, is one among many examples I could conceivably marshal in a series of ₁T₂ly-well-founded test[i}n,…,m{on]i|alls. By memetime of the event, analysts at Strategic Research and Analysis, MACV-J2, were well aware of the notion that the VN War was more about anti-animism (think, e.g., Marine Kit Carson Scouts and SOG Hatchet Forces in Injun Country) than about anti-communism (the mere conscious rationalization), and that intensity of the “anti-” was affectively-charged by collective compensatory abreaction (by definition: unconscious) to the ever more piling-up of experimental evidence of quantum nonlocality (think: non-bombability and the inability to effectively “find, fix and finish”) and quantum non-simple identity (think: them Maoist-fish-in-the-population-sea VC cadres, each with their numerous AKAs and wearing multiple hats in their double-stacked and tripartite hidden-qua-dark infrastructure). So, along comes a subcontractor to CORDS (Civil Operations and Revolutionary Development Support), a Dr. Louie le Grand Prix, into the second-floor offices of SRA at MACV-HQ, seeking information about POLOB, political order of battle (he being the only CORDS person ever to visit SRA). Upon questioning, we discovered that Louie was a theoretical physicist focused upon QM who had gotten a grant to design a hamlet defense system. Poor Louie! We all were laughing so hard, and couldn't stop the hysterics, that he simply had to leave without learning anything at all about hamlet-level political order of battle. When is what, they say; what is when. Concretion of memetime. Haptification of ponderablespace. Mere statements, eh -- their time-concept not holding that “whatever” to be topo-active; the designated space-notion not being thrice removable from unbalanced overelaboration of the sensation function. Lightermen steering cognitive barges into dark-is-nite sea journeys. Enter by exfiltrating the unrelenting no-returns river, dey-zah-viewing once again, extraMadUra, willya, PinC-you's-guys/you's-gals? Gee-willikers! “Hourly with the dourly!” or is it “Dourly with the hourly!”? Ask [do}wagers of the 24-hr news cycle. Catalania: was, and is, the hm-hmm-hmmm dot-dot-dot m-iteration, sequenced and stored forever online; a line, like any other, ₁T₂-only-definable. Memetime passing. Incoming non-legals made legal by the immigration-lawyer subset. $8/, 1974; then, $5/, 1980: the interstitial $3/ (which once covered, for those long-since born-localized, the Home-Office-mortgagee's mortgagor-provided monthly payment) nowthen beingbeen Extre[Mad}U|rah-rah sent, uh, from NearAbroad to… heh-heh-heh, FarAbroad (curbside collapses from the PUbleeec condition of inan[a}tion!), for sucre of X³-homeland security. A decade prior to onset of the era of SAG-prez as PATCO-union-buster precedent setter! All right, then? or Alright, then! Either overheaded Q-brain intel or underheaded binary-minded a-pox-rah-rah-fa? There, that is that, that which is the underhanded ₁T₂-only-imposed choice! Refuge of dunces: either/or logic; either for or against, fore or aft. Reason -- ₁T₂-only, I eventually learned -- always put my me, no normie, off. The very idea of re[son}ing to CNNly “train-my-brain”… ugh! Machine-learned, I'll come back, à la BillyBlake, as the “ghost of a flea”! Ah, well, having narrowly escaped a coconut-monk's pitt-of-despond, I successfully parried them ANNs -- however much there was blood on the water (think: nite-missions on the m-kong delta of Triangleland). Data overlords! More and more forecasting WashUps on the Isle of time-series Mongrels, what. Either white swans, or those black: choose only the white. No normopathic refusniks are these snarling AI reinforceniks of the coercive-internet business model! One absolute counterindication as regards gaining conscious access to _µT_m-inner-Musculpt is the prevailing omnipresent ambient “music” environment, a strong [pro}motor of ₁T₂-only-normosis. “Makes your day go good” -- this binary Lebenswelt: to quote a most-astute parodying McKinley Toliver, my coworker-mate at nursery-cum-landscaping employments, works smart-valve servicing, say, among many others in that high-muck-a-muck D.C.-HM-a-M-socius subset of toffs, e.g., the husband-and-wife Alsop's GT-TH residences, plural, around-several-corners, plural, from my one-memetime temporary 28th-&-Q homestay -- indoor plants and outdoor plantings most particularly. In regards to corpus of toffs constituting the landscaper's carriage trade, I won't tell inflammatory stories-in-particulars peculiarly-known to my me, but I will state that the particulars of the general state of the WWII-survivor-exemplars, ground and air combat, which I had m-{ply]ly been invited to em[u}late (html blacks out this text when bra/ket written!), were experientially-to-my-me, found by that me -- 8-year-old beginning-to-dawn, circa 1953, FLW's Imperial Hotel, Tokyo -- to be so repugnant that, no matter how much induced by proffered power-opportunities cum material-advantages… I/i^m waswere not in the least [mu}bit interested. Take a leadership position in a bad war? As if there were any other! Take a leadership position in a bad global monoculture? As if there were any other! Those were my attitudes during the Sixties and Seventies. I asked myself: which ratio[sin}nations have I uncritically ingested? Nowadays there are a few who believe that the global monoculture is worse than merely bad. “If you study hard enough, you can join the global leadership elite that will…” Ugh! Circa, 1963.

No. Not cause[monad}ology or acausal such[what}not. It seems exceedingly presumptuous to yet try to put a name on the cos[m}ology we've been in speculation upon this last half century. Platonia, Hologramia, Catalania, Noospheria, Cyberia, Castalia: while each of these, and presumably others, may be partially characteristic of the involved GBG, glass-bead-game, [n}one/[m}one encompass(es) the whole conception. Physics of the cosmology (see here for instance) is not Musculpt symformphonie (see here for instance) which is not quasi-fractal-e-boundary-defined _µT_m-LETS nesting-foams (see here for instance). More and more detailed little pictures of the as yet still very, very vague big picture. Each aspect, however, if ever to be much more fully understood, requires, by its predicated presence, acquisition of the capability to think in m-valued logics, rather than merely ₁T₂ly about m-valued logics. A task not yet even begun, let alone accomplished. If we look at the vonNeumann universe as contextualizing probabilistic normopathy {PU|PU} = 1 (html blacks out this text when bra/ket written!), instead of a universics having whatnots-unto-somewhats cum somewhats-unto-whatnots equaling non-₁T₂ly-well-founded infinitions to Cantorian C+, it may be hard to place the reals in reality and even harder to keep them so placed. Given that all the numbers numbering the well-founded vonNeumann universe are ₁T₂-only construed, just try to imagine how little we know of the non-selfsame numbers numbering “universes” _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m cum _µT_m-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_C+T_C+ -- or, alternatively, the relative-states of identity-transparency of this one and only memetime-independent, non-orientable universe, that case in which spacetime is a demergent, not a desolvent. For my me, a for-one: crypto time-stamping presumes Pragmatism's utility of memetime, which I've never challenged, as well as inviolable integrity of the (preferably crowdsourced-crowdfunded open-source) time-stamping software. Longterm integrity of which, I doubt -- particularly (in hindsight of some small bit of knowledge -- re: KYC -- of the actualities of the application of Phoenix pogroming, its API-globalization and subsequent introjection, reinforced by my recent reading of Paul Preston's The Spanish Holocaust, a real reality-orienting experience, real-numbered or no: TL;DR for most of the world's remaining readers, apparently, given the dearth of found correspondence-observations) with shifts to SCSSized CBDCs, and as non-quantum-simple-IDity ₁T₂-only-digital-IDed such stamping goes into pandemically planetarized snapover onto every imagined well-[de}liberated blockchain application. Pursuit of particular immaterial objectives mandated that during the first 20 years in which NT and I were together we lived in 25 places. During that period, an unnamed State of the US-of-A tracked my me all over the planet seeking $130.00 in tax revenue on an old-junker vehicle I no longer owned during the “time-stamped” period for which the tax was supposedly due. After so many years of such vamping, which, I feel sure, cost the State, if only in wages, far more than $130.00, I repented and paid what I didn't actually owe. Moreover, furthering my doubts, was a gold-card experience suffered after paying the yearly stipend for two decades: internet access to the card account was lost when the sign-in procedure repeatedly -- three times -- malfunctioned. During call-in from a booth in the nearest town's P.O., I was told that the only way to establish my identity, such that internet access to the account could be restored, was by me answering my telephone-of-record (ToR) -- which was located 12,000 miles away. This ToR, actually my sister's landline, having been established a long memetime before advent of worldphones, which I had no need of, then having not received a phone call in over a decade, now, a lot longer than that. What if I take my card and my passport and my physical presence into your nearest office -- 10 hours by train away. No, not good enough. You must answer that phone. Two minor incidents among a fair list vectoring my orientation toward global-monetary-system pragmatics. Most everyone else, I suppose, has their own list -- and, likely, more elaborate than is mine, my me being an oversaver and an underspender; hence, ZIRPed well and not-so-good. Not to mention the many sorts of intentional “malfunctions” systemically perpetrated, and yet to be perpetrated. If there are these sorts of problems with ₁T₂-only-bank-monetary systems, how imagine the requisite capability for _µT_m-LETS systematics rooted in a quantum-composite [mu}itic unit of account? The slow trial-and-error bottom-up bringing-up must be slooooow, indeed! And even then, likely viable only with holographically-exteriorized inner-Musculpt-as-maths-notation being progressively developed-through-use and incrementally deployed as user-friendly interface.

The lo[go]philo[sopho]sci[en]co-orientation ₁T₂ly-implicated by the cosmogony I aspire to _µT_mly embrace cannot accurately be characterized as logical positivism-unto-empiricism. Indeed, I take Mach's Principle (forget about his -- much less important -- sensationalist attack on the reductionism of the mechanical world picture, i.e., All-That-Is is nothing but matter in motion, à la Heraclitus' everything is nothing but changes: see section “3.2 Mach's Influence on Einstein and How Einstein Himself Saw It” of Gereon Wolters' “Mach and Einstein, or, Clearing Troubled Waters in the History of Science” in Einstein and the Changing World Views of Physics, Christoph Lehner and Jurgen Renn and Matthias Schemmel [eds.], Birkhauser, 2012) as being a cyclotomic, topologically-active-operator-time-executed, demergent concretion of the oriental-positivism-self-observational empiricality, à la inner-Musculpt symformphonie, of, presumably, _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-logics, which notion (think: QMicle relative-states of identity-transparency, this one and only universe; not only GRicle overall distribution of matter) is altogether different from, say, Planck's statistical-probabilistic-Boltzmannian-irreversibility defense (see: “The Unity of the Physical Universe”, in A Survey of Physics: A Collection of Lectures and Essays by Max Planck, R. Jones and D. H. Williams [trans.], Methuen, 1925, pp. 35-41, which I read at Cornell, circa mid-1970s) of the “fixed unity” (i.e., resolving to ₁T₂-only logical-coherence) of a “physical world picture” which classical physics did not distinguish from a “physical world”, which was, back then, 18th century, regarded as having had “initial conditions” (required in order to write and solve calculus equations). Moreover, my non-orientability-take -- à la the third-order of the 3-fold topo-active optime posit, à la Parmenides' no-thing ever happens -- predicates absence altogether of any initial conditions with respect to any and all supersystem-system-subsystem composites; therefore, in respect to post-paradigmatic-physics fundaments, a non-calculus-bound Weltanschauung. However, my “take” is sort of Planckian, in that Planck's most fundamental unification principle (see “The practice of principles: Planck's vision of a relativistic general dynamics”, M. Giovanelli, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 78, pp. 305-360, 29 May 2024, wherefrom we quote, to wit,

…the significance of the principle of least action in Planck's epistemology… Planck was the kind of physicist who does not simply try to guess various particular mathematical formulas that fit the phenomena but aims to uncover the fundamental, general principles that lurk behind all those apparently disparate equations. These principles, possibly converging into one fundamental principle, encapsulate what Planck referred to as the 'unity of the physical world picture'…)

is implicitly embedded in 3-fold topo-ACTIVE-optime, in that the “quantum of action” at each “fold” is codified in the three orders of complex-hypercomplex-temporal CURL occasioning optime execution of the m-logically-valued propositions Gödel-numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers intercalated to the Regge bones and intersection points thereof of scale-invariant Triangleland, the supersystem-system-subsystem composites of which are, _µT_m-LETS speaking, “governed” buy, uh, uh, by, m-valued scale-relative universal physical constants (think: _µT_m-LETS speaking, such constants Mach's-principle analogically indicating utility of an m-valued quantum-composite unit-of-account incorporating each-and-every variously-backed LETS currency in the nesting-foams). Frankly, I got onto this “retroflexion”, sipping a tall-rocks-glass (these days, where else to be found?) of Jameson -- no longer, having recently passed the 80-mark and thus needing a low-level of contaminants, into the Jack-in-the-Black that O-U-a-mT filled one of the two canteens carried by the SFers running Mike Force detachments, sour-mash, I eventually learned, not being acceptable to the Sontory, uh, uh, Suntory-conditioned palate -- sitting up close to the lovingly-well-tended-by-lovelies downstairs obsessively-wiped U-shaped round-about-expanse of rosewood in Phnom Penh's Pasteur-Street Shanghai Bar (upstairs being home of the local chapters of both the French Foreign Legion and the American VFW: alternate nights, thank God!) off-to-the-side listening to an F-A contention concerning whether or not Marcel Duchamp prefigured debates on the quantum-measurement problem (contrary to popular opinion, in my experience, beginning in the lower troop decks of the USS Randall, circa July of 1953, in route from Seattle to Yokohama, our newly-minted, 2-door, canary-yellow, my mother's choice [had it been black, and 4-doored, when sold in Tokyo three years later, it would have brought a fortune, instead of a pittance], Buick Roadmaster in the hold, this F-A-contentioned subject not being all that unusual amongst, especially, SOF-types, the motivations of whom are not at all understood by… well, you name 'em! those what don't “see” deep-structure cause-push/attractor-pull, and even find a need to put a wash on the 'isstory). Sitting back, smiling contentedly, I did not intervene upon this F-A contention -- ultimately a face-up-to-face stand-up stand-off -- with the Relationalist observation that Duchamp arguably prefigured the quantum-measurement-problem-revealed insight that you're-in-all found-objects which always are all ways readymade.

Still, in its dimness memetime-past has a din-ness, makes a din, most thoroughly synaesthetically qua cross-modally triggered by smell; indeed, such memory-traced time is a Dinn ((“dinn” = “taking” in Pali; and, being altogether “…stripped of its heathen mythological accessories…”, we have, in 3-foldedness, i.e., Genesis iii, according to the Spirit of revelation embodied in, QUOTING, to wit, “…the Babylonian 'sage' [,] the serpent is Tiamat (Tihdmat) [think: Trikaladrsti-tapassiddhi: T¹, T², T³], the source of all evil, the personified Dinn [think: Maxwell's angelic demon-daemon, i.e., 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, logical-ontological executor of the F{all-Rise} instruction sets Gödel-numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers]. This expresses a profound thought, since the essence of evil is the falling back [think: ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, of cascade DEmergence] into the natural elements, out of which the world in mankind is raised [think: ConveDD of reverse-cascade REmergence] to the image of God. The serpent is called dibit (the enemy…”)). UNQUOTE. Di, uh, uh, thee, uh, uh, thy, uh, the dibit -- no mere bivalent bit, my I/i^m bet -- likely being a stand-in for (animistic-pagan qua quantum) multivalent [mu}it (as distinct from 2-state qubit). Heh-heh-heh! Wot? Geez! 'Oo'd be 'aving wit' that, then? Wi? 'Oo the 'ell d'yer pertend ter be? Spec'acle-invest' toff or sum'sec' mick, I reckon. 'Ell no, I 'in't, yer say? 'Ow, then? Cos of wot's wot, that's wot, yer say? D'yer e'vn know 'ow ter find wot's wot? No, so's I reckon. Geez! Hmmm. Not collegial enough, then, to be any sort of joiner? The Links? Taking a drubbing, your you is, then? Plonked here; plonked there: in point sets? Oh, O-Dinn! So, you god of war, what's the only way to escape the kill zone of a [cog}native I[am}be|bush site? The best weapon, youth unto middle-aged, for demonsterative projection of force-structures in the strategic offensive, a daily body count? Your cranium a 'uxley's eyeless-in-gaza where memetime has had a stoppage? Mach's Principle: non-simple identity, al[be}it to the greatest relative-state of T (transparency, not truth), as twelve, good and T, ought well to known-- but don't. Thus, we have that “don't”, and others, expressed as [cog}native debility projected as a bravoing temerity compensating a suppressed ₁T₂ly-paradoxical squeamish impulsiveness which Hollywood appropriately accompanies with hurdy-gurdy music. CURL: twist and shout! Shout your acoustically-modified gravity-wave modes. Non-aequilibrium's dark [baal}lad of the hell-hammered spiral dance. Anticonstitutionalism's couch-potato sitzkrieg having transited to runtime at democratic centralism's double-time [de}liberation… the speed of light -- not in vacuo, thus being no cosmo-absolute limiting velocity -- does not quench memetime's passing, however much such time, a hubristic, Providence-confirming, T-forward measure, is a Barbour-RAMmed memory store, hence a trading-floor bellringer's Looking Backward, such that the chronological capacity, protecting war and the notion that there are such as accidents, resident in haptification of memetime's concretion can be used to create a triangulation interface to ponderablespace-place single-valued localization (necessary to sustain bombability), all the ConveDDs involved affectively charging resultant obsessive compulsion to anti-Martingale double-down on winning the continuance of the suppression of Schrödinger's multivalue. Insistently demanding mitigation of the n-multigation; desiccating the techno-doctrine-of-uses so as to purify simple-identity into the ever-more simpleminded. The memetime of my me's lifeline-so-far: spanning the 80 memeyears since the VJDay-end of the WWII battle of the Two-Hundred-Years War of the World (the BBs, Baby Boomers, being dated from 1946, that makes my I/i^m part[s] of the Greatest Generation, 1925 thru 1945, my parents being classified as earlier Traditionalists, despite my father having been a paternal B-17 pilot). Hasn't been much “progress” incorporating Schrödinger's multivalue vis-à-vis monetary-system numeraire during the period of my me's lifeline-so-far -- discrete-time normalized (that is: backwardation of the contango to unitas, uh, uh, the unity denoted by 1, under the assumption of efficient ₁T₂ly-rational equilibration of the involved ensemble behaviors), stochastic-probabilistic, white-swan martingales remaining binary-mind filtration-dominant, right along with the postulated BornRule normalized-statefunction dissimulation which is subharmonic to the topologically-active-operator-time-construed-quantum-harmonic-oscillator account (in 3-fold topo-active optime Rx: subhar-har-superhar -- the boundary of the all-balled-up object-space being without-boundary under fractalization to the faceted-horizon of Husserliana: hardy-har-har, in the onomatopoeic reduplicative!). Quoting Raymond Mikesell's Bretton Woods memoir: “White's Unitas was only a unit of account; Keynes' Bancor was an international currency”. Bancor was meant to have come in with an ICU, International Clearing Union, the clearing-union notion having -- significantly, as regards deep-structure historicity, IMHO -- been originated by a Funky Nazi Germany, circa July of 1940, and adopted by Keynes. Unitas, unitary, unity, unit, 1: normed, normotic, normopathic. Both imagined numeraires, American and British, had either been actualized, were to have been referenced to gold (in the event, the USD was made the Lord-granted-right-of-the-lord seignEUriage-enabling privilege exorbitant-vehicle reserve-UnitasBancor). Putting a gloss on the actualities as they were, StoneX Bullion says in January of 2025:

During the Bretton Woods Conference, approximately 730 delegates from 44 Allied nations came together to design a framework that would stabilise exchange rates, encourage international trade, and help promote economic growth. All 44 countries agreed to peg their currencies against the U.S. dollar with diversions of only 1% allowed. Each nation was required to monitor and manage their own currency pegs, mainly by using their currency to buy or sell U.S. dollars as needed.

Again quoting Raymond Mikesell's memoir:

The basic negotiations on exchange-rate stability, foreign-exchange practices, the source of funds, and the lending policies of the Fund were completed before the Bretton Woods conference… The products of the conference… unfortunately do not reflect the high competence of their originators. This failure was due in part to the national political pressures on all the participants… The representatives of the Soviet Union had great difficulty [see here for considerable amplification] in relating the arguments on exchange rates and exchange practices to their economic situations…

And as regards the April of 1942 White Plan, Mikesall says:

The ISF [International Stabilization Fund which became International Monetary Fund] would also have had the power to determine the rates at which it would buy and sell the currency of any member and to approve or disapprove any changes in exchange rates governing transactions among member countries… Because the United States expected to have more than one-fourth of the total vote, it would have the power to determine every member's initial exchange rate and to bar any change thereafter. This was unacceptable to the foreign delegates, and the July 10, 1943, draft provided merely for consultation with the ISF on the initial rate prevailing on July 1, 1943, if that rate were judged to be inappropriate by either the ISF or the member. The new draft retained the provision requiring a three-fourths majority vote for any subsequent changes in par value. The justification for a change in a member's par value was a condition of 'fundamental disequilibrium' in its balance of payments. There was some discussion about the meaning of fundamental disequilibrium, but Treasury officials proposed neither a precise definition nor an objective formula for detecting it. Indeed, fundamental disequilibrium has never been defined in fewer than ten pages.

I think we can safely assume that these Treasury officials were not overly concerned about disequilibration of purchasing power imparities hardened relative to the initialized par values established for member currencies, given the difficulties stipulated for accomplishing “subsequent changes in par value”. While the April of 1942 provisions were, as Mikesell describes, so modified, IMHO it would be far from naive to suppose that during April of 1942 criteria were brought to mind, if not then fully developed, upon which the preferred peg values of given currencies were to be determined by the ISF, and that political and war-role-related (see here for considerable amplification) factors (pro-Allies, i.e., the “United and Associated Nations”; anti-Axis, à la “There was no provision in the White Plan for membership by other countries”) would likely have trumped those purely economic, as regards “the national political pressures on all the participants” noted by Mikesell. In the actual rollout of the Bretton Woods system, as described by Michael D. Bordo, “The IMF pressured its members to declare par values as soon as possible.” But, due to constraints imposed by postwar economic conditions, the system didn't become operational until the late-1950s. This focus upon how the BW-initialized par values of the currency pegs to the USD backed by gold valued at -- a clearly knee-jerked, not well thought out relative to postwar conditions -- 35$/ounce were accomplished being due to awareness of how variations in currency real-exchange-rate values affect purchasing power supposedly self-equilibrated to a frictionless LOOPed (heuristic law of one price) PPP, purchasing power parity, by the magical-invisible hot hand of the ₁T₂-only-processing markette as ostensibly facilitated by the price-specie-flow mechanism of gold backing or, alternatively, good offices of arbitrageurs, even so in a fiat-currency regime -- despite what George Soros identified as self-referential (think: not Sorosian unknowability, but the Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbered propositions of EmilPost's _µT_m logics: “…if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation, then it would be the formal system most in harmony with regard to…”, OMG, whatever!) reflexivities preventing market-mediated equilibrium states, this prevention, to some, justifying iatrogenic extrasystemic interventions. In his 1840 book, Mutualist, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, famously said: “Property is theft!” In our 1994 novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, the _µT_m-mutualist cum Gurdjieffian-reciprocal-maintenance-advocating protagonist not-so-famously asserts that “Single-valued property is theft of the multivalue!”, that theft being with reference to the multi-values of Schrödinger's statefunction (the values which integrate the quantum composite, the relative-state of which constitutes the quantum potential inducing autopoiesis and self-organization: the actual “mechanism” of “invisible hands”), arguably best interpreted with _µT_m-valued logics understood in the terms of Machian (Mach's Principle, first stated in 1883, concerning part-whole relationals) relative-states of identity-transparency, not truth-values. Of course, it would be wonderful to know if there is any analogical embodiment (via the temporal CURLs of 3-fold topo-active optime) of relational observables in loop-quantum-gravity perspective on problem-of-time GR to the short-memetime/long-memetime-problematic of LOOPed PPP self-equilibration.

Clearly, the more MSG one eats the more pellucidly one sees the truth; indeed, the more absolutely one takes oneself normed to 1, a single T or F binary information unit, heh-heh-heh! -- given that truth-value is Boole-bound, if not altogether reaching total habitus in glutamate etching and anchoring under normopathic orchestration by prescriptive enculturation-socialization. Since I've, as much as possible, avoided MSG consumption for many decades, I could not honestly swear to having the [cog}native wherewithal to re[cog}nize truth, let alone tell it-and-nothing-but-it in its unutterable selfsameness; and, as regards the whole truth in its inalterability… well, that surely must involve restriction altogether of [cog}n|I/i^m|tion solely to the lowest logical-value order-type, which, again, I, uh, I/i^m, could not honestly swear to having fully submitted to -- not since aged-8, anyway, when, so my me remembers, occurred my I/i^m's first ID-transparency transit, circa 1953, rice paddies, wind-blown rain, sitting on the blood-grass mound under the sacred pine, Midori Gaoka qua Verdant Hills, Ashiya-cho, kita-Kyushu. The pusillanimous binary-mind -- in large part due to the inclement correctness insistency of its punctiliousness -- experiences diffuse-mental-state transits toward identity-transparency (think: animistic-pagan “participation mystique”) as instances of over-empathy wherein objects come crashing-in -- “instances” because the fight-flight reflex to push back is instantaneously elicited in the same way insistence upon verification that the stick lying across the path is not a snake is urgently elicited. Such transits do not involve a “force” of attraction, only a change of consciousness-state mappable as state-space (think: by concretion, the “feeling space” referred to in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh) curvature convolutions and their acoustically-modified gravity-wave-mode signatures (think: Musculpt symformphonie). The near-universal normotic predilection is evident in the fact that, more than a century after advent of Einstein's General Relativity, gravity, in encyclopedias and elementary textbooks, is still quite generally referred to as a “force”. Newton, having spied the apple eaten by Turing, was so rooted in velocity he barely saw acceleration; Einstein, having “eaten” light velocity, was so rooted in acceleration he barely saw topologically-active operator-time -- spying of which requires the “eating” of absolute limiting time-rates-of-change of acceleration, then looking back without turning into a pillar of salt. Not a mere matter of minimal measurement variances between N & E: GR is altogether different from Newton in its imports concerning Weltanschauung demergent to Lebenswelt demergent to Umwelt. Instead of U_mwelts, normopathy induction insures neuronal etching down to U₁welts on basis of a radically-reduced valency imposed upon Lebenswelts at the mercy of Weltanschauung deautomatization-unto-dyscrasia. Preaching to the birds? Nope. Quite the contrary: the birds preaching a research model to the saint. Just like in birds' learning of birdsong, the learning of [Um}welt-qua-[Iambe}world introjections from Lebenswelt from Weltanschauung -- my me, my family, my company, my country, my multilateral, my belief system… -- clearly has a critical window of opportunity, in the latter case, the period in which neural-network wipeouts transpire (think: “multistep critical periods of higher cognitive behaviors”). As regards the above-given concerning MSG codification of truth-value as fundament of logic, heh-heh-heh, quoting Anne Perry's novel Blood on the Water, the 2014 Headline paperback edition (somewhat out of context, as her “it” involves the mass-murder category of atrocities, not the subliminally-perceived existential threat [stick-snake on the path] posed by quantum-gravity):

It attacked their countrymen, and therefore their own identity… How did you tell people something they did not want to know?… What did you need to say to have them question the bedrock on which their beliefs of themselves were built? [p. 348]

And when the law is held in disrespect, we don't know what other things we trust may also fail. [p. 353]

Financialized ₁T₂-logic-only lawfare (think: Legal Positivism) coupled to ₁T₂-logic-only monetized medicine: what a multi-m, uh, uh, multi-millennium, disaster! Going from compensation by unconscious processes to super-over-compensating compensatory abreactions in episodic fulminations (for a detailed account of fulmination-onset dynamics in one highly-instructive case, see Paul Preston's The Spanish Holocaust). Heard, even, are people proclaiming their belief that global-elite-fomented mass migrations were plausibly-deniable false-flag planned to create pretexts for global Nazification, one society after another. Arguably, these trans-unto-post-humanist days it's impossible to find evidence clearly indicating that any existing deconstructed over-trusted institution is actually operating in the human interest: that circumstance sheds considerable light on how properly to specify the corpus culpable for the ever-increasing number and magnitude (not speaking solely of genocidal holocausts) of crimes against humanity, to include those of iatrogenic pandemics, war on the environment and the food supply, environmental warfare, space warfare, flooding the Lebenswelt with dissimulated-quantum-based infratech, et cetera and et cetera and et cetera. Which are they, those “…we don't know what other things we trust may also fail”? Prices, maybe? “The markets cannot hide from true price discovery forever.” David Andrews got it right: gravitating (1776, publication date of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations) upon an Aristotelean-(Baconian-Boolean) price, not (1883, the dating of Mach's Principle, or, no later than 1921, publication date of Post's _µT_m-logic Ph.D. dissertation) upon a Machian-(Einsteinian-Postian) price. Quoting Andrews' “Adam Smith's natural prices, the gravitation metaphor, and the purposes of nature”, Economic Thought, 3:1, 2014 (yesterday, the World Economics Association pdf download of the complete paper was available; today it is blocked):

Adam Smith's “natural price” has long been interpreted as a “normal price” or “center of gravitation price” based on the famous gravitation metaphor of the Wealth of Nations I.vii, natural in the sense that it is the price that would result if competition were truly free, unobstructed by monopoly or government regulation, and could also therefore be called normal price, appealing to a sense of natural opposed to that which is produced artificially… I criticize this interpretation of Smith's gravitation metaphor. For Smith, it is not a Newtonian metaphor for the attractive character of natural price, but rather an Aristotelian metaphor for the pattern of movement of market prices, in which natural price serves merely as a reference point [think: ₁T₂-only-logical single-valued natural price as analogue of the inertial reference frame]… I present an interpretation of Smith's natural price based on his understanding of nature, in the context of his assertions that the goals of nature are the self-preservation of individuals and the propagation of species, goals humans pursue with divided labor under bonds of mutual dependence, facilitated by exchange and hence prices. [Note that “divided labor”, subsequent to Smith's memetimes, by mission creep transmogrified into extended-family-destroying “mobility of labor” into optimum-currency-area qua OCA-codifying local-multiplier-effects-sucking-up-hot-money “currency mobility” money-center sinks.]

Smith's “normal price”, my I/i^m -- in light of Mach-Einstein-Post -- regard(s) as being normotic, in that its bi-valently-processed single-valuedness precludes fulfillment of Mach's Principle with regards to its, that's the price's, information carrying capacity vis-à-vis the mu-valently-processed quantum-composite supersystem-system-subsystem multi-valuedness of the universal statefunction, i.e., which states how the large-scale relative-state structure of the econometric universe relates to localized behavioral patterns induced by changing micro-scale action directives (₁T₃-logical: inertia, momentum, stall into fall; hold, buy, sell). Mach's “price principle” ((rooted in an allele-o-tropic, qua allelotropic, i.e., of each other, theory of value, as discussed in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh: [eco}nomic value as “measure”-of-relative-state vis-a-vis integration of quantum composites facilitated by given [_µT_m-priced] “gauge invariant [economic] observables”: be aware that in the General Relativity account of gravity there is “vanishing canonical Hamiltonian”, and that's why 3-fold topologically-active Pauli-Paine operator-time should altogether replace the Hamiltonian, i.e., not be conjugated thereto)) would be met, IMHO, within LETS nesting-foams, the currencies of which variously commodity-backed relative to Everettian-vonHayekian “time-shapes of total capital stock” planet Earth, not by stochastic processes, but by pricing with m-valued currency units, each with “ensheaved” (that is, [can}to by the ePound, à la, “ensheaved and garnered in the heart” so as to prevent econ-o-a[no}mie by coerced indulgence in dissimulated-quantum in[a}n-|IT|i{on] -- not “ensheathed”) values fine-grain tagged to indicator-measurables, transactions therewith _µT_m-logically processed by Lukasiewiczian analog computation.

This is hilarious, heh-heh-heh!: after 202 years (think: N. H. Abel, circa 1823, existence proof knee-jerk-interpreted as impossibility theorem, and the episodic, fulminative, devolutional regressions therefrom: normotic back-reactions on the import metrics of transcendentals, transfinites, axiom of choice, Lukasiewicz ₁T₃ cum Post _µT_m, Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction…), The Wall Street Journal finally, circa 9/11.2025, catches up -- sort of, uh, uh, got one minor aspect of the “physics 'conspiracy'” (not even “_µT_m-relative-state ID-transparency” as “conspiracy”), but has yet to get the “higher mathematics cum logic 'conspiracy'”. And just contemplate the socio-econo-politico-military context -- Hu-ah! -- within which this article appears (think: the “snapping”-turtle attribution as to the droning of Poland). My “brilliant wife”, to quote several who have known her, Nha Trang (who, inspired by her accomplished-lay-Buddhist mother, I suppose, has never put herself forward, and recently no-replied to a BBC email-request to interview her as being one who has had an “interesting life”, which no-reply she justified to me by saying, “Twice having been pictured in Life Magazine as a Hue school girl is enough publicity for me”: she might not wish to put herself forward, but I have no compunction as to doing so), studied folklore under Alan Dundes at UC-Berkeley. Eight years after she received her Ph.D. degree (cultural anthropology with emphasis on folklore, comparative literature, and sociology), Dundes wrote an article on the “light-bulb joke” (“Many Hands Make Light Work or Caught in the Act of Screwing in Light Bulbs”, Western Folklore, XL:3, July 1981: apparently, as one would expect, not posted to the web) -- which, in its canonical Polish-stigmatizing form, I speculated upon, beginning with my 1975 Cornell-Mathematics-Library-occasioned first awareness of ₁T₃ and _µT_m logics. Quoted by WiKi: “Q: How many Polacks does it take to change a light bulb? A: Three -- one to hold the bulb, and two to turn the ladder.” My speculation was that this joke was subliminal derision concerning “Polish logic”, i.e., Lukasiewiczian ₁T₃ -- and that the joke marked a regressed-archetypal collective-unconscious-event gradient prefiguring the Nazi invasion of Poland. Well, I didn't know for sure that the joke had pre-WWII origins, but speculated, by summer of 1977, that it did, as it fit so firmly into the larger context of patterns, e.g., the notion that knee-jerked consensuation of the 1926 BornRule (the “Witch Bull” of the 20th century!) interpretation of Schrödinger's 1925 m-valued wavefunction (instead of by employment of Post's 1921 _µT_m-valued logics) was the straw (placed by the Trickster archetype) that broke “camel's back” (backcloth of the collective unconscious) as regards onset of the WWII fulmination qua battle of the 200-Years War of the World being fought over the nature of “nature's notion” of identity qua identity as a logical-ontological-cosmological whatnot memetime-independently demergent to mass-marked somewhats brought Prigogine-being-into-becoming by Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time execution of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-valued cosmic propositions. Nowadays there are a number of postings indicating Polish jokes had pre-WWII origins, e.g., from the WiKi posting, to wit, quoting:

Some early 20th-century Polish jokes may have been told originally before World War II in disputed border regions such as Silesia, suggesting that Polish jokes did not originate in Nazi Germany but rather much earlier as an outgrowth of regional jokes rooted in historical discrimination of Poles in German-ruled areas, at least from the 18th-century Partitions of Poland, and actively pursued from the end of the 19th century by the government-backed German Eastern Marches Society, resulting in social class differences. Nonetheless, these jokes were later fuelled by ethnic slurs disseminated by German warlords and National Socialist propaganda that attempted to justify Nazi crimes against ethnic Poles by representing Poles as dirty and relegating them as inferior on the basis of their not being German.

In light of this, I would further speculate that the Polack version of the light-bulb joke, in specific, came on the scene during the immediate post-WWI period in which Lukasiewicz moved decisively toward formulation of ₁T₃, back-reaction on the metric of imports of which being well underway by 1918 via Bertrand Russell's logical atomism, good offices of Ludwig Wittgenstein. Logician Emil Post was also of Polish ethnicity, but _µT_m-logics Post-understood à la the last couple of sentences of his Ph.D. dissertation, being much more of an existential threat to the prevailing institutional base, indeed to the whole of post-ancient-Greece Western cultural resources, than is ₁T₃, subliminal awareness of the imports thereof surely were too deeply buried in the collective unconscious to facilitate joke formation. What, particularly, is not well understood is that any repression on the level of surface-structure is deep-structure processed as a furthering of regression of the involved archetypes-in-themselves (which may be construed as Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, à la a push or two forward -- into topo-active optime and temporal CURL -- of Marie-Louise Von Franz's 1974 Northwestern U. Press published Number and Time: Reflections Leading Toward a Unification of Depth Psychology and Physics via recognition of the analogical parallels between Jungian Platonism and Einsteinian Machianism: yes, regressed numbers ConveDDed, conversion-disorder displaced, by regression analysis, to mere hyperplane stochastics). The further regression of the involved archetypes-in-themselves festering up hyper-elaborated subsequent fulmination dynamics: what we of binary-mind-identification presently have to look memetemporally forward to. Mach-on, Mach-on! say the naysayers imputing conspiracy-fictoids to conspiracy-factoids. One conspiracy-factoid made a fictoid in order to “save” (actually, to further regress) the 17th-and-18th-centuries Weltanschauung's institutionalization which binary-minds persevere in introjecting to their Umwelts, is _µT_m-numerical non-selfsameness (think: I/i^m numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers, the _µT_m hierarchy demerged-down of order-types of self-referentiality) ConveDDed to SIE, self-interaction error (think: analogous to relegating self-observation to memetime-bound retroflexion). Note that xc, exchange correlation, is viewed as removing self-interaction, this being the case in the “single-particle [Hamiltonian] approach to many-body quantum mechanics”, this approach being conducted under ₁T₂-only-logic alone, and despite the factoid that correlation length goes to infinity (best understood _CT_C+ly) at divergence-onset of critical states. As soon as the scalar field is taken to the 4th power (not to mention the nth powers where n-meet vertices appear and are ₁T₂ly not handled as intersections of the J.G.Bennettian null-vector-defined “pencils of skew-parallels”-codified notion of self-referential non-selfsame-identity-in-diversity), i.e., tantamount to being memetime endowed, the binary-mind can't picture it, the logic required for processing not being available (absent delivery of conscious access to the quantum-brain's inner-Musculpt symformphonie?). Notice how the single-particle-Hamiltonian self-interactional “hierarchy problem” (correlated with the “time problem” of GR, with its “vanishing Hamiltonian”, poking its head into quantum-gravity physics?) is due to “quadratic divergences in the Higgs mass” (think: the acceleration-stanching-mass-delivering rubber bands, qua “pencils of skew-parallels” of the Higgs field, being the Regge bones of Triangleland?) and that none of the proposed solutions involve going beyond quadradic to “absolute limiting time rates of change of acceleration” _µT_m-logically processed (Einstein's most famous equation needs to be dotted and double-dotted), let alone viewing the “hierarchy problem” as being epiphenomenal to the GR “time problem” which requires going “beyond” real memetime to imaginary and hypercomplex topo-active optime.

Well, well, well. Half a century later: it finally comes out. But with no reference to the RELATIVISTIC-QUANTUM (sans a “classical limit”, but incorporating acoustic blackhole analogues) Paine-Kaplan, nested-grid, numerical-forecast (12 hours in advance on the 1-km grid! using historical data sets, as the NWS was uninterested) CASCADE-model of tornadogenesis ((the cascading complex-hypercomplex energy-momentum being carried by the solar wind into Earth's upper atmosphere, from there down (temporal CURL), down (temporal CURL), down (temporal CURL), derry derry down, into Earth's crustal and core dynamics)): see “Occurrence of tornado outbreaks influenced by solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere coupling”, Paul Prikryl and Vojto Rusin, Advances in Science and Research: Contributions in Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 18 July 2025. And what of the reverse-cascade brief-back to the Sun, anything new on that? You bet there is: see “Development of Models of Acoustic-Gravity Waves in the Upper Atmosphere (Overview)”, O. K. Cheremnykh, et al., arXiv, 3 August 2023. Not what the average American thinks of as coming out of Slovakia and Ukraine, I'd guess.

Martin Armstrong's Secretes, uh, uh, Socrates, software may be right in its speculative forecasting about ingress unto the ending of a 300-year cycle based upon the surface-structure data fed to it, but there is also the possibility that the 300-year-cycle cusp is a subcycle fulmination of a deep-structure-structured 3000-year-supercycle cusp being simultaneously ingressed unto, an ingress that Tom Luongo's Generation X leadership elite may not, adept wind-surfers or no, be able (given that this elite is ever-more deeply burrowing itself into identification with the 17th-and-18th-century institutional embodiment of the already 200-years-dead -- think: N. H. Abel, 1823 -- Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm) to midwife egress of the cusp surface at bubble-up-and-over to wave-break. For a discussion by Armstrong and Luongo of issues involved in the 300-year-cycle-cuspover speculation, see the YouTube VDO here. Egress from the Greek Dark Ages involved laying the pre-Aristotelean foundations of bivalent logic. Emil Post's last Ph.D.-candidate-enunciated sentences, circa 1921, to wit, once again quoting his dissertation-as-published paper entitled “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, American Journal of Mathematics, XLIII:3, p. 185:

We must however take into account the fact that our development [rigorous “derivation” of _µT_m logics] has been given in the language of ₁T₂ and for that very reason every other kind of system appears distorted. This suggests that if we translate the entire development into the language of any one _µT_m by means of its interpretation, then it would be the formal system most in harmony with regard to the two developments.

(particularly if applied to interpretation of Schrödinger's m-valued statefunction) may be regarded as initialization (100+ years ago) of cusp-surface rise toward cuspover of a 3000-year cycle beginning in the Greek Dark Ages. And I would further suggest that more than half a century of assaults (either by geoengineering or by “we own the weather”) made upon Earth's upper atmosphere, à la the larger imports of “Occurrence of tornado outbreaks influenced by solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere coupling”, Paul Prikryl and Vojto Rusin, Advances in Science and Research: Contributions in Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 18 July 2025, assaults made under the 200-years-dead Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm's assumption of a “classical limit” making Earth's atmosphere a “Newtonian domain”, may well, whether ever acknowledged or not, be one catalyst to a leadership-elite-non-midwife-able 3000-year-cycle cuspover, after which, howsoever much Hollywoodization, there will be no door in the floor.

The casting of yarrow stalks implies the Book of Changes; the casting of two-sided coins implies the Book of Chances. Moreover, as stated in our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh, the read configuration of the fall (think: topologically-active operator-time execution of the numbered numbers numbering Mach-on rubberbands?) of the yarrow stalks is relative to the Higher Heaven of T_riangleland, not to mattering probability waves understood the Tao of physics. So, in kowtowing to the Book of Changes, I don't say, “Shit happens, Darwin, I-Ching…” The Taoist Taijitu, TaiChi-disk symbolic reference to rotational-₁T₂-only logic, IMHO, cogently represents the Taoist recoil from the Higher Heaven of yarrow-stalked T_riangleland into a stalking of the “wild pendulum”: Confucianism…Taoism, Taoism…Confucianism, and then there is Confucianism…Taoism… Uh, uh…anyWAY! Similarly, if not self-similarly, my _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-unto-₁T₂-quantum “relational” is not that of Carlo Rovelli (see the ₁T₂-only: “Relational Quantum Mechanics”, arXiv, 24 February 1997) or even that of Johannes Tambornino's push toward quantum-gravity (see the ₁T₂-only: “Relational Observables in Gravity: a Review”, arXiv, 28 March 2012). On _C+T_C+-T_zog-chenAllBase-qua-CommonGround, the “highest” heaven of Higher Heaven, i.e., the pure land of unsullied universal-consciousness-without-an-object, being-there, à la Parmenides' nothing-ever-happens, is no such as to permit “observation” (indeed, any such registration immediately quantum-quenches the “state” -- so has it always been reported) -- and “interaction” non-simply does not exist. The notions “observation” and “interaction” are order-of-logical-value dependent: full-fledged cases of which exist only on the ₁T₂-only order-of-logical-value where the associated notion, truth-value, reigns supreme.

Try looking at “it” this WAY: the correspondence between the T_aoist-WAY take on the coin-toss mathematics of the I-Ching and the mathematics of DNA's genetic code, understood a single-level encipherment, is with respect to the lowest-qua-₁T₂ level of comprehension, the historically-post-T_riangleland comprehension. The m-valued, radiation-induced, DNA-emitted quadripolar-wave output is indicative of the higher and higher and higher T_riangleland M_ach-on-M_ach-on-M_ach-on levels of genetic encipherment, the (Trikaladrsti-tapassiddhi: T¹, T², T³) topologically-active operator-time-executed levels signified as to the order-of-logical-value-processing classes _µT_m, _CT_C+, _C+T_C+ (_µT_m incorporating ₁T₂ as its most-reduced limiting case). The earliest dating of the I-Ching I've found internet posted is to about 1,000 B.C.E.: approximately 3,000 years ago, beginning of the aforementioned 3,000-year supercycle. The yarrow-stock-fall T_riangleland-understanding -- as to the “'mechanism' of action”, heh-heh-heh, of the involved chronomancy being DEmergence of the “pattern of the time” on _C+T_C+ AllBase most-dense (i.e., smooth equipotential surface) equilateral-triangular-grided sheet under the autopoietic temporal operations (execution of Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers numbering rubber-banded, J.G.Bennettian “pencils of skew-parallels”, fiber-bundled, Regge-lattice “bones”: think n-jective/m-logically-processed, strange-attractor smoothnoodlemaps) designated by the term Trikaladrsti-tapassiddhi -- would have, according to my scheme, predated 1,000 B.C.E. My first T_riangleland encountering (realization of the necessity for the “counting” of which being a much later development of my sensibilities) came with the manner in which I was taught, circa 1970-'73, the (I would say: pre-Zen) aesthetics of Japanese gardening by an old man, Nonkei T. Ishiyama, who received his horticulture degree from Chiba University during the late-Meiji era: see pp. 531-34, Vol. 2, our novel, The Moon of Hoa Binh. After reading Sir John Woodroffe's The World as Power, listed among others here, as well as Ernest G. McClain's The Myth of Invariance (see our novel: Vol 2, p. 775) and Pupul Jayakar's The Earthen Drum (think “fractal drum” and see our novel: Vol 2, p. 770), I felt that the T_riangleland notion long predated advent of the Vedas and involved, not simply myths, but complex physical theory likely codified in the _µT_m-logically-valued terms of inner-Musculpt symformphonie, not those of “modern” post-Aristotelean/post-LaoTzuConfucius ₁T₂-syllogistic-rotational mathematics-numerology involved in the bifurcation of physic into Greek and Chinese (Vedic not discussed) medicines as essayed by Shigehisa Kuriyama in his The Expressiveness of the Body and the Divergence of Greek and Chinese Medicine. So, according to my scheme, if there are hu-hu-[hu}man financial cum business cycles, social cycles, Platonic-Aristotelean-Polybiusian political cycles, economic cycles distinguishable from embedding natural cycles, they are rooted in the quadripolar-wave-spin-off-rippled biophysics of helix-coil re-re-recycling à la velocity, acceleration, time rate of change of acceleration, vis-à-vis intra-neuronal and intra-perineural DNA, as glutamatergically anchored under orchestration by prescriptive enculturation-socialization. But, actually, I am not much of a believer, not having bought into the supposed “classical limit”, in non-quantum simple-cycles, more like Peter Turchin's nonlinear cliodynamics, except that his is along the surface-structure feedback-adaptive lines of memetime-bound 2^nk chaos-complexity and mine is along the deep-structure Klein-bottle-nesting-foamed wavicles of topo-active-optimed M^nk DEmergence-decomposition/REmergence-recomposition. So and thus, therefore-[because-since] -- that's 3-dots up, 3-dots-down in T_riangleland -- cliodynamically-speaking, the 300-year cycle, insofar as there is such like, clearly is dominating surface-structure-these-days, whereas [mu}itic|ally-M_ach-on-speaking, the 3000-year supercycle, insofar as there is such like, clearly is dominating deep-structure-these-days -- and no matter how well be weathered factors of the 300-year-cycle cuspover, the 3000-year-supercycle cuspover (if suppression of its factors continues, and hence of their regression) will govern overall phase-shift dynamics. Or to my me thus and so it seems.

It's easy enough to see why the situation un livre (book: masculine) lying on une table (table: feminine) is French gendered the way it is: as grammatically-incorrect Dylan (I, for a purported-one, can't exactly comport imports of his rhetoric with implications of his real-estate holdings) had it, “Lay, lady, lay.” Surely, had he used the correct form, “Lie, lady, lie”, he'd have been deemed a m-[i]sogy|n-[i]s|tic [per}son. Two-thousand-plus years later and the hu-hu-[hu}man species is still crucifying itself, orthogonality speaking, over retroflexion and/or resurrection of (quantum)-animistic-pagan (T_rinitarian-₁T₃ unto _µT_m)-relative-state identity-T_ransparency. The Cradle of Faith: M-theory-mystic's Christic _C+T_C+. Continuum, Christ, uh, Cradle…Crypt-- Hmmm. Crypt = LSTD, limited spacetime domain? Orthogonality: whathow more heretical than a claim to circling the square? Easy as pi, what! Why, in German, der Tisch (table: masculine) is of gender opposite to that French, well… Hmmm. And as to why this sort of gendering was stripped from English as the [mid}evil period came to an end, well… Hmmm. Inherited from Latin, inherited from Proto-Indo-European, inherited from… ANIMISM. Animistic “participation mystique” in origins of, especially French, linguistic conventions can't be admitted, of course. And English, especially the American variety, has most thoroughly stripped away that Injun-country stuff, [de}mean|ed to “participation inconsciente” under the unspoken tacit assumption that there is an Umwelt-introjective-automatization “Mechanism” of Meaning glutamatergically etched and anchored, such ₁T₂-only “meaning”, following Arakawa's-Gins' “We have decided not to die” transhumanism, being actually enculturated-socialized [de}meaning of the DEmergent semantic contents of _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+-unto-_µT_m, and retrograde-inversion REmergence, qua A-G “Reversible Destiny”, that m-logically-valued DEmergence-REmergence unfortunately being deemed “savage”. In pre-colonial Vietnamese, with residuals right up until the present day, the ₁T₂ly-constellated object's right-hand side was distinguished from its left-hand side from POV of the animistic object, not from POV of the animated subject: this being one reason why U.S. forces couldn't follow directions and always went the wrong way during the American period of the Viet Nam war. Those sneaky…! Hmmm. Him-his; her-her: why is that? Check out Raverbashing saying, “I always wonder why does past grammars seem much more complicated…” Because the m-logic built into animistic-object n-identity is “much more complicated” than inanimate-object non-quantum-simple-identity -- _µT_mly-much more, at the very least. Pro[no}men (think: “Old Europe”, before domestication of the horse and associated rise of patriarchy) are, to my me, actually [Con}nymia, confidence-gaming names, glutamatergically etched upon normotics. The recent conundrum over “preferred pronouns” is indicative of, well… Hmmm. How many (industrial synthesis exploded during the 1940s; concern thereabout increased in the mid-1990s) are the transgenerational-effecting (via higher-temporal levels of encoding?), but not DNA-sequence-changing, mimetic estrogens currently in the environment and food chain? Just try to imagine how complicated French and German become under the transgendering effect! Then think of the complement: SugarDaddy's FortuneCookie. In their upcoming dissimulated-quantum-infratech VR, our meyouwe isare being offered what they consider to be: modal-logic's the best of all possible worlds. “Come with me.” Where hisstorically has that been heard? What the blazes? There is a woebegone sidelongness -- to put sidewinderness in the polite language of cafe-society chitchat, these days-of-drear probably TikToked (that's tocked, not toked -- heh-heh-heh!), given the normotic's memetime-boundedness -- about their infernal eternal sidestepped unit-circling-of-the-wagons farthingale-skirting of… them interrogative scrutineers -- Ono'nzaragozah! -- whatwho, despite the structural-automatization theory of ego psychology, [re}guards egofunctional sublimation of polymorphous perversity as providing the impetus to civilization, however many its discontents, a notion embraced by OSS-R&A as expressed by its graduates in Love's Body and Eros and Civilization (these analytically subordinated, at SRA/MACV-J2, to the notion that the moral impetus to authentic sociality-precluding-mass-warfare has its habitus in, not superego-imposed [con}science guilting, but direct ontic experience of I/i^mD-transparent “participation mystique”, whereupon it is understood in immediacy that the lower, i.e., murder, is a higher, i.e., suicide. One case of regression-in-service-to-the-egofunction is, by normopathic ConveDD, conversion-disorder displacement, reduction-of-the-statefunction to a collection of probability-wave amplitudes over which design of measuring apparatus and use of ₁T₂-only logic form a renormalization selector (reduction of the wave-pac[man}ket to the uncertainty relations of “it”s interaction with the ₁T₂ly-constellated en[viron}ment, heh-heh-heh). ConveDDing taken to be emerging, what! uh, whatnot to somewhat. Globalization-to-monoculture as rampant eclecticism (e.g., a restaurant in Phnom Penh being specialized in “Japanese-style Western food”, one dish containing Spanish-Portuguese-Mexican chorizo made in Viet Nam by a Japanese company with several retail outlets in the greater HCMC metro area, population of which approaching that of Cambodia as a whole), ostensibly a sublimation-in-the-tacit-dimension of _µT_m, but actually a regression thereof, a regression echoed in the rescaling-renormalization a[nest}the|sizing, e[the}real, global-monoscale blockchained memetime stamps near-universally regarded as localizing, so regarded by good offices of the techno-ConveDDing of the spontaneous localization which is a statefunctional ConveDD of regression-in-service-to-the-egofunction. O-so circular, such Gödelized cognitive farthingales! -- that's CTCs, not _C+T_C+-unto-_CT_C+ as demerged (think the Paine-Pensinger mid-1970s idea: higher-temporal properties qua encoding-levels of the quadripolar quantum-wave dynamics of intraneuronal-DNA helix-coil transition occurring within a Tipler cylinder?) by 3-fold Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time execution of the Lukasiewicz-Post cosmic propositions which are numbered with Gödel-numbered Gödel numbers. Women's fashion fads and their fadings-away have always provided reads on changing dynamics of collective-unconscious processes. I/i^m ConveDDed to Iⁿter[nice}^n/e: if only it were that e-n[i}c|e|ly done! Local c[i}vill[i}tie warmade into c[i}vet|illity. Red flags, black flags, white flags having failed, all that was left to the right were false flags. How do I come up with such word-salad schizotactics? Well, for one: “A too-busy clinical neurologist seeks a writer assistant.” This was an unclassified (not even FOUO) ad in the WaPo, circa 1972. I responded, and jargoned my way into the “job”. Hmmm. Pro bono, in exchange for co-authorship of any published articles. “What the heck! Pro bono appears to be my fated royal road to learning: six months of 7-days-per working-for-free for an old Japanese gardener (his-and-hers Beeches Nursery located exactly in the LeesburgPike-ChainBridgeRoad-intersection shadow of CIA-HQ: he, regarded as a subversive, thrown out of Taisho-era Japan into CA-agricultural-laborer status until WWII-“placed” in incarceration at a special internment camp for incorrigibles; she, daughter of a French mil.officer diplomat-soon-very-wealthy-Tokyo-businessman and a high-status Japanese mother, nonetheless ostracized as a bi-racial, who jumped at an out-country arranged marriage: each a wealth of well-founded worldly-and-supraworldly wisdom, openly available to those intelligent enough to tap-thereinto) before he asked me how I made a living.” The doctor's office was in Falls Church, near unto my Vienna locus just off the defunct-railroad-bed-embedded Wedderburn Station (first battle involving a train in warfare-hisstory of the world!), that Civil-War-era Alexandria-to-Leesburg line running quite close to the modern-day Vienna CIA outstation posing as a benign corporate entity (I ate at the Vienna Inn at least once a week, and so did some of the well-covered denizens). I “worked for” the doctor at night -- after spending the day learning techniques of nemawashi as regards different tree varieties and ages (I also learned details about the involved procedures, one kind of tree to the next, working alongside the Japan Embassy gardener, a onetime gardener at the Kyoto Imperial Palace and Kyoto Sento Imperial Palace gardens) -- and being, as aside commentary, instructed as to its, nemawashi's, cognitive-sociology-cum-management-theoretical correlates by my coworker, Toshikazu Kajiwara, an unimpeachable Kagoshima urban and regional planner who threw away bureaucracy bindings for the freedom of international travel and the benisons of hard physical labor (by Toshi's good offices I became a pseudo-member of a select DC-no-Washington group composed of sushi chefs, Embassy chefs and gardeners, tour-guiders, multi-lingual Japanese secretaries at the World Bank and other such whatevers, Japanese-restaurant waitresses, Japanese-club hostesses, and not least, a few Japanese students attending local universities, some of whom were rather amazing: the monthly get-together being a mah-jongg contention after hours in a Chinatown restaurant, midnight-till-dawn, whereupon the winner paid the huge bill for the multi-course-feast breakfast-for-all). The doctor provided me with piles of clinical records, saying: “Each of these collections has a paper involved. Survey the clinical evidence and develop a plausible thesis.” What the blazes? I did this for three years until I went off to Cornell. All of the papers were accepted for publication by major mainstream medical journals, but none were published for being too far down on the list-of-importance: the doctor's clinical exposure was not sufficiently leading-edge to garner the publications he hoped for. Not only, in my lifetime so far, have I ever properly finished anything undertaken, always moved on when the learning cycle fell off a cliff -- beginning with Life Scout unto Eagle Scout in the Far East Chapter -- but every project undertaken inevitably had a ₁T₂ly-fall|a|c[i}ous non sequitur outcome, that which was being contended against being too-well deep-structure rooted to have been subject to cognitive nemawashi, let alone childhood lessons in judo-unto-jujitsu. Anyway, for better or worse, I learned a great deal from my studies of the clinical records, the writing exercises, the periodic depthy-unto-moredepthy-if-not-mostdepthy discussions with the overworked elderly doctor giving me more and more me[me}time as we got to know each other better and better. Youme, one, them|ed{me], who[whom|ed}soever -- actually, cosmically-speaking, what[who}soever, not-whowhat -- can't productively talk about any of this _µT_m-sort of stuff with virtually any taking-themselves-to-be-a-one ₁T₂-only-onesuch: that's why my Iambe stopped attempting so to do about 40-years ago, and, ₁T₂-only-consequently, the highly-educated “friends” -- supposedly my lifetime-closest, but some of them actually insurgents to my countering, to the point of… -- I then had (nowadays, all these memeyears later, virtually none, few trending to zilch at this ₁T₂-only-definable point in [0,1]-memetime) took umbrage at my I/i^m's apocryphal…hah, “everwhats”: quote this D, not that D: “Hey, pass it on: he doesn't need any; somehow, he's always otherwise stoned without it.” Circa 1970. This excommunicative injunction coming from a having-survived-all-that FO's -- forward (that's [0,1]-, not [1,0]-memetimeline) observer's -- combat-tested observational-astuteness, hey-hey-hey, what! Heh-heh-heh! “Highly-educated” is an interesting term: knowing a little bit about many, many, many things. “Expertly-trained” is an interesting term: knowing a great deal about only a few things. Hey, CNN: du-ditty-do, won't you, as to be so nice as to “Train your brain”, uh, uh, my brain, that brain so-so-so glutamatergically-etched as to be a “no-brainer”. As the early-1970s became ([0,1]-memetemporally) the mid-1970s, Cornell tornadogenesis specialist, Douglas A. Paine, increasingly found himself teaching calculus to his incoming students before he could teach them atmospheric science. And, later, in the higher-level courses, as soon as he veered off from classical meteorology into the physics underlying relativistic-quantum cascade theory of tornadogenesis the tension in the lecture hall reverse-cascaded upward into palpability (on-skin heebie-jeebies to the psyche-sensitive! like my me), all but hanging visibly in the air. He was there 40-hours a week (what, uh, which, other prof did that?) and his office door was never closed. Students would come in mopping this mope and that, saying that they couldn't understand this aspect or that of the recently presented material. He would patiently go over it again and again, generally at the office blackboard. But he knew (and never so accused them) that it wasn't a problem with their understanding; they understood, but their conscious awareness of that understanding was so leveraged by subliminal forcing relative to the, particularly psychosexual, implications of that understanding that the easiest psychological rationalization of the situation was that of not-understanding. That “not-understanding” was the easiest way to push it away: this “push” being no sublimation; rather, a repression-unto-regression, yielding psycho-to-physical ConveDDing. Quantum non-simple-identity is very scary because of all its animistic imports for self-experience (one reason why, for my me, “highly educated” necessarily involves some exposure to the Gurdjieff work, or some equivalent thereto, on “inner-separation” and “self-remembering”, et cetera), not to mention evaluations of the history of hisstory, insofar as there is such, sans objectivity of ₁T₂-only-definable, passive, passing, referential linear-time. Regardless of the standard definitions, I've always, since learning of it, regarded “historiography” as having to do with the chronotopological shape of history: linear, cyclical, spiral-form, nesting-foamed, so on ((thanks be due to Prof. Albert D. Mott, “Backgrounds of Western Civilization”, AU-SIS, circa Fall-1963, for driving this home to my me: as to today, OMG, no wonder! -- on an essay test, I made elaborate comment upon Miguel de Unamuno's The Tragic Sense of Life, something of a precursor to the TransHumanist will to extend ₁T₂-only per[son}al simple-identity unto eternity-as-infinite-linear-extension, a will itself prefigured by the attempt to wholesale take over the “mechanism” of identity by means of genetic engineering, a book listed among the recommended readings ignored by many of my classmates, and M called me into his office to caution me against the dangers of embracing U's “irrationalism”: it was a decade later, after listening to George Crumb's “Ancient Voices of Children” [I learned, circa 1974, of the October 1970 Library of Congress premiere whilst taking Mus Comp 3 at GMU], that I sought out, and found out about, how Fredrico Garcia Lorca and U were murdered during what I now am aware of as The Spanish Holocaust, during duration of which counterinsurgency MOs developed and employed in Spanish Morocco were introjected to the homeland and widely deployed against the population therein, as noted in Paul Preston's account, p. 173, to wit, “The right now took full-scale revenge… Numerous doctors, lawyers, writers, artists, schoolteachers, and, above all, workers were murdered”, analogue to the GWOT-projection of Phoenix into planetarization was not a Spanish-empire option after 1898; in most case hisstories -- actualities considered, instead of the ex post facto popular-hagiographic-propaganda accounts -- counterinsurgent actions preceded those insurgent)). The philosophy behind such hisstorical time-shapes constituting “historiosophy”. The study of what hisstorians do, and what they think about what they do, as “historiology”. Under Pauli-Paine imaginary-hypercomplex 3-fold topologically-active operator-time, much of this histo-stuff is inoperative: scary e-nuf in and of itself -- insofar as an “itself” exists under the I/i^m-logics superordinate to ₁T₂. Let it be noted that Paul Prikryl's and Vojto Rusin's WONDERFUL “Occurrence of tornado outbreaks influenced by solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere coupling”, Advances in Science and Research: Contributions in Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 18 July 2025, is based largely on statistical analyses, whereas the Paine-Kaplan, nested-grid, energy-momentum-cascade, numerical-forecast model of tornadogenesis was a computerization of the involved relativistic-quantum microphysics (the unpublished, for being so unwelcome as to cause a fistfight at the back of the room, severe local storms conference preprints from the 1970s, cited here, provide detailing of some aspects of the relativistic take, if not an overview), understood as initialized by complex-hypercomplex angular-momentum (handled relative to temporal CURL, likely quantized by good-offices of Penrose twistors) inputs carried by the solar wind (with the further thought being that solar variability is driven by extra-solar-system cascade-forcing).

How could I have “leaped” (a quantum-jump between some one-and-another critical brain states?) from “Get some back from the Bear!” echoing hallways of MACV-HQ in immediate aftermath of Tet-'68 to anticipation of an AfPac Sting mounted so as to induce a Soviet incursion? So sayeth my me: “Before the much-more-lucrative private-merc contract to the PMC-subcontractors there was, lads, sheep-dipped Swiss-banked per diem -- quite impressive it was, wasn't it, I jocosely phonate that I'd jocularly enunciate, as any LodgeBillRecruit well-knew and could so do.” Whereat, there is always a rumpus of protests as to accuracy of the jawed assertion -- these protestors not knowing about the missions to Tibet, Yunnan, Kashmir, Congo, the like. Some of us -- by no means most of us among all of us -- have ourselves so-sufficiently in the so-right as to be quite thoroughly identified with ₁T₁-logic: e.g., ge-or-ge-or…well, what else-mo' could have been expected but holocausts-there and eventually holocausts-here, genocidal or no? Homophobically [dis}count-'e-nanced, he did, didn't he -- do-champ, indeed! -- with his s.mutt-shopped height-of-the-war entripid U're-in-all prefiguration of go-del-oper|at[or}ed a|rith[me}tic inconsistency-or-incompleteness circularity bald-or-dash. Subverting good Christian Clarity! with a preference functor (f_xxx) for collective continua over digital discretes. Humph! Deploring, uh, uh, deploying, bunks of higher-highers to m-moscow us'mu-m with mu-mu-muing mos[chi}toe muon-viron-koans gmo-brought-over all the way from chynher. In my judgment, disordered conversion-displacements -- not causality-teleology, not quantum probabilities-proclivities-predilections-propensities -- are characteristic of infantile-regressed-archetypal event-gradients of the collective unconscious (which, by no means, are the only type of such gradients). My Lord, dear old crow, the only way the British could have believed that Animal Farm and 1984 were not written as warnings to them was by not reading Burmese Days! Given that intergenerational memory is both incomplete-and-inconsistent, much to Gödel's chagrin such interstates -- states between -- must be deemed governed by, at the very least, neglecting higher-order terms, ₂T₂-logic. There is a rather recent very edifying paper relevant to these concerns, a paper discussing the “critical brain hypothesis” wherein “the possibility that the brain could operate at or very near a critical state between two different dynamical regimes” is systems-generically analyzed and probed relative to epidemiology: see “Not One, but Many Critical States: A Dynamical Systems Perspective”, Thilo Gross, Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 15, 2 March 2021. Edifying, indeed, is a comparison of Gross' Equation 27 with our Equation 17 as given here. In the preceding two paragraphs, Gross justifies his interpretation of steady state (qua ground state, reference state, stable state) in the following manner:

In an epidemic there is typically a steady state when the number of infected reaches zero, and this steady state cannot be perturbed in the negative direction as such a perturbation would be unphysical, leading to a negative number of infected.

Actually, I think this formulation neglects the possibility of endemic subclinical infections, but more importantly it tacitly invokes the notion that, in order to have a steady state, the Hamiltonian operator must be bounded from below, thus precluding negative infection (qua energy) states. Whereas, our interpretation (compare to here) of our Equation 17 suggests processes rather more complicated (see: the “A Wave STATEMENT for an Autopoietic Process” section of our 1980 paper entitled “Some Preliminary Considerations toward Development of a Mathematical Model of the Autogenic Brain Discharge as Spontaneous Localization in Quantum Measurement”, and particularly the attached Appendix): if, in the Taylor series expansion, whereunder ₁T₂-only-logic alone, each higher order derivative “emerges” smaller and smaller, thus, even so early on as by the third-order has become tantamount to a spiraling into the singularity at zero (see Gross' Equation 7), and therefore can be ignored (which we do in presenting a standard derivation), then, heh-heh-heh, however ₁T₂-“paradoxically”, under _µT_m-logics, the third-order is envisioned as, and treated as, signifying the DEmergent nested Klein-bottle reentries (see the “Multivaluedness, Self-reentry, Non-Orientability, and Hyparxis” section of our 1977 paper entitled “Toward a General Theory of Process”) critical-state-divergence-executed by the whole corpus of higher-highers -- the exe-instruction being “Musculpt.exe” (as named by Paine during 1975) via 3-fold Pauli-Paine topologically-active operator-time as replacing H (consider this in relation to “On quantum systems with a self-adjoint time operator without violating Pauli's theorem”, Tomer Shushi, Europhysics Letters, 151:3, 12 August 2025) -- covering the nesting-foam of LSTDs, limited spacetime domains, over which, in the standard Rx, H and bar-h would have to be multiply defined ((cf. in the limit is not some selfsame value, but a logical-value phase-transition: a ghosting (see the “Axiom of Choice and spiritual channeling” section of our 1968-to-1998 paper entitled “Echo of the Mockingbird”) of field theory, à la Avantgarde, “They lead to so-called ghosts, which are negative energy/negative norm states. Negative norm states, of course, do not make any sense in (probabilistic) quantum theory. Busting these ghosts from a variety of effective field theories is an active field of research.”)). As spatialized-per[son}alized me[me}time father and father, uh, uh, farther and farther goes bye-bye on the 2^nk-fitness fatherlandscape, normopathic renormalizations require addition of more and more fathering “epicycles”.

Consider our imaginary-time notion of 1st-order temporal CURL as depicted here (involving emitted quadripolar waves in the DNA helix-coil-transition [think: gauge orbit] case where each pole corresponds to a nucleotide-pair codon [2nd- and 3rd-order temporal CURLs carrying higher orders of encipherment]; in our model, b, deemed the “counterforce to the pressure gradient term”, is more generally the “gravitational acceleration”), by comparison to the following, as regards spatial curl, drawn from “Classical and quantum complex Hamiltonian curl forces”, M. V. Berry, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 53, 10 September 2020:

Curl forces [1] are Newtonian forces describing accelerations…

My purpose here is to explore a subset of this Hamiltonian subset of curl forces, and their quantisation. These forces are characterised by an underlying complex structure. They describe a particle moving in the plane r = (x, y), and F(r) depends only on the complex variable z = x + iy through a scalar function F(z). For such 'complex curl forces', (1.1) reduces to dynamics in the complex plane:

z^doubledot = F (z) , (z = x + iy). (1.2)

The function F(z) is assumed to be analytic in the z plane, possibly with isolated pole or branchpoint singularities.

In the consensus quantum case, the Hamiltonian is a Hermitian energy operator acting on evolution of statefunctions in Hilbert space as codified by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation BornRule interpreted relative to probability amplitudes. But what if statefunctions are interpreted relative to the EmilPost _µT_m-logics understood in the terms of relative-state identity-transparency, not of probability? And, considering the following consensual notion as stated in “Relational Observables in Gravity: a Review”, Johannes Tambornino, Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications, 8, 2012:

In nonrelativistic physics one usually assumes that the time parameter t corresponds to some external clock which is not influenced by the dynamics of the system. However, this is not the case in general relativity due to background independence: there is no preferred notion of external time.

what if the time parameter is not considered a referent of any sort, external or internal, but a topological actor, indeed, active internal clock-operators inside active internal clock-operators? In this notion, the T-cap of Tomer Shushi, à la “On quantum systems with a self-adjoint time operator without violating Pauli's theorem", Europhysics Letters, 151:3, 12 August 2025, would be, not a self-adjoint operator because violates always real, always orthogonal, but would be a _µT_m-relative-state operator upon the m-logically-valued reference space, MVRS). We have not argued that space operates on time to generate form (as regards “form”, think: gauge-invariant local observables). What we have argued is: time operates on space to generate form (more specifically: topologically-active operator-time operates on the MVRS to generate form). We have considered the cascade-theory proposition that demergent, ₁T₂-only-definable, ponderablespacememetime is tantamount (e.g., scales of wave motion cum LSTDs, limited spacetime domains) to being laminated cum tessellated as residual of the hierarchy of _CT_C+-unto-_µT_m-logical-value order-types of the cyclotomically-decomposed BackCloth (a spatial background, not a matter of referential-time background dependence) of the _C+T_C+-AllBase of MVRS, i.e., Hilbert space under the last two sentences of Emil Post's 1921 paper on _µT_m-logics extended to the continuum. Tambornino employs a referential linear-time qua “parameter-time” (which we regard as a “memetime”) to explain why “general relativity is a totally constrained theory with vanishing canonical Hamiltonian”. We take that temporal-queue-vanishing (quoting Tambornino: "All observables must have vanishing Poisson-brackets with the constraint and, as a consequence, do not evolve in parameter-time. . .") as a cue to invoke topologically-active operator-time operations on the full spectrum of MVRS laminations-tessellations. Obviously, in our 3-fold topo-active optime take, space and time are not “on the same page” and the many-initial-conditions problem is absent because there is no such as an initial condition under 3rd-order accelerated self-acceleration (think: self-reentered gyon nesting foam?), hence a self-reentered non-orientable whatnot, cyclotomically decomposable. Quoting Avantgarde writing in Physics StackExchange “Non-existence of double time-derivative of fields in the Lagrangian and violation of equal footing of space and time”, to wit: “This problem of ghosts is in addition to the general consternation one has when they are required to provide many initial conditions to deal with the initial value problem.” Following Avantgarde, Doron Behar elaborates, saying:

The reason to generally avoid second order (time) derivatives in the Lagrangian is that they bring to third order equations of motion, that would need three constants of integration to be solved and that usually imply the possibility of “run-away” solutions (or Ostrogradski instabilities). These are solutions in which the energy increases exponentially…

The appearance of such exponential increases, in the Paine-Kaplan nested-grid, cascade-theoretical, numerical-forecast model of tornadogenesis, cue initializations (i.e., Musculpt.exe) of temporal CURLs (think: topo-active optime [not an operator-observable: a topological operator] “takes a hold of” space and gives it, minimally, a twist -- likely quantizable via Penrose twistors), metasemantically understood as a zero-equals-infinity unto zero-does-not-equal-infinity self-reentry-type phase transition indicative of a logical-value order-type “quantum-jump” thereover in _µT_m, be it as regards ₂₂₃T₆₉₁ or whichover, the given such given (think: “ghost” -- to the binary-mind) being the base-state of the Gödel-numbered Gödel-numbers numbering the m-logically-valued propositions particularizing the particular case.

₁T_{2 µ}T_m I/i^m “double-digit midget” I/iⁿ _CT_C+ T_{zog-chen 1} 2^nk

---

Contact the page editor

Return to:

•Top

•Homepage